血压正常受试者在血流限制下不同时间动态阻力运动的血压反应:一项随机交叉试验

L. L. Sousa, D. D. Nascimento, Nicholas Rolnick, J. Barbosa, Robson Conceição Silva, Bruno Viana Rosa, Thailson Fernandes da Silva, Carlos Ernesto Santos Ferreira
{"title":"血压正常受试者在血流限制下不同时间动态阻力运动的血压反应:一项随机交叉试验","authors":"L. L. Sousa, D. D. Nascimento, Nicholas Rolnick, J. Barbosa, Robson Conceição Silva, Bruno Viana Rosa, Thailson Fernandes da Silva, Carlos Ernesto Santos Ferreira","doi":"10.33233/rbfex.v21i4.5247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Recommendations for time under blood flow restriction (BFR) during resistance training (RT) vary between 5 to 10 minutes, and beneficial effects on muscle mass and strength have already been reported. However, there exists the potential for longer times under restriction to produce greater acute activation of the exercise pressor reflex and subsequent sympathetic pathways leading to a greater hemodynamic response. Objective: To verify blood pressure responses to dynamic resistance exercise with different times (5 vs. 10 minutes) under blood flow restriction in normotensive subjects. Methods: In a randomized crossover trial design, twelve healthy and physically active male participants completed a training with BFR under the following protocols: control, BFR-5 minutes, BFR-10 minutes. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurements were taken by an experienced researcher immediately after each exercise set. Results: Both BFR-5 minutes and BFR-10 minutes induced acute elevations in SBP, DBP and heart rate (HR) as the sets progressed, without statistical differences between them. However, BFR-10 displayed a superior effect size for SBP and DBP compared to BFR-5 minutes. Conclusion: Based on the present study results, the time under BFR during resistance exercise does not affect blood pressure response in normotensive subjects.","PeriodicalId":219038,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia do exerc&iacute cio","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood pressure response to dynamic resistance exercise with different times under blood flow restriction on normotensive subjects: a randomized crossover trial\",\"authors\":\"L. L. Sousa, D. D. Nascimento, Nicholas Rolnick, J. Barbosa, Robson Conceição Silva, Bruno Viana Rosa, Thailson Fernandes da Silva, Carlos Ernesto Santos Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.33233/rbfex.v21i4.5247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Recommendations for time under blood flow restriction (BFR) during resistance training (RT) vary between 5 to 10 minutes, and beneficial effects on muscle mass and strength have already been reported. However, there exists the potential for longer times under restriction to produce greater acute activation of the exercise pressor reflex and subsequent sympathetic pathways leading to a greater hemodynamic response. Objective: To verify blood pressure responses to dynamic resistance exercise with different times (5 vs. 10 minutes) under blood flow restriction in normotensive subjects. Methods: In a randomized crossover trial design, twelve healthy and physically active male participants completed a training with BFR under the following protocols: control, BFR-5 minutes, BFR-10 minutes. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurements were taken by an experienced researcher immediately after each exercise set. Results: Both BFR-5 minutes and BFR-10 minutes induced acute elevations in SBP, DBP and heart rate (HR) as the sets progressed, without statistical differences between them. However, BFR-10 displayed a superior effect size for SBP and DBP compared to BFR-5 minutes. Conclusion: Based on the present study results, the time under BFR during resistance exercise does not affect blood pressure response in normotensive subjects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia do exerc&iacute cio\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia do exerc&iacute cio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33233/rbfex.v21i4.5247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia do exerc&iacute cio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33233/rbfex.v21i4.5247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在阻力训练(RT)中,推荐的血流量限制(BFR)时间在5到10分钟之间,对肌肉质量和力量的有益影响已经有报道。然而,在长时间的限制下存在产生更大的运动压力反射的急性激活和随后的交感神经通路导致更大的血流动力学反应的可能性。目的:验证血压正常受试者在血流受限条件下,不同时间(5 vs 10分钟)动态阻力运动的血压反应。方法:在随机交叉试验设计中,12名健康且身体活跃的男性受试者在以下方案下完成了BFR训练:对照组,BFR-5分钟,BFR-10分钟。收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)测量由一位经验丰富的研究人员在每次运动后立即进行。结果:BFR-5分钟和BFR-10分钟均随时间推移引起收缩压、舒张压和心率(HR)急性升高,两者间无统计学差异。然而,与BFR-5分钟相比,BFR-10分钟对收缩压和舒张压的影响更大。结论:基于目前的研究结果,在抗阻运动中进行BFR的时间对血压正常的受试者的血压反应没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blood pressure response to dynamic resistance exercise with different times under blood flow restriction on normotensive subjects: a randomized crossover trial
Introduction: Recommendations for time under blood flow restriction (BFR) during resistance training (RT) vary between 5 to 10 minutes, and beneficial effects on muscle mass and strength have already been reported. However, there exists the potential for longer times under restriction to produce greater acute activation of the exercise pressor reflex and subsequent sympathetic pathways leading to a greater hemodynamic response. Objective: To verify blood pressure responses to dynamic resistance exercise with different times (5 vs. 10 minutes) under blood flow restriction in normotensive subjects. Methods: In a randomized crossover trial design, twelve healthy and physically active male participants completed a training with BFR under the following protocols: control, BFR-5 minutes, BFR-10 minutes. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurements were taken by an experienced researcher immediately after each exercise set. Results: Both BFR-5 minutes and BFR-10 minutes induced acute elevations in SBP, DBP and heart rate (HR) as the sets progressed, without statistical differences between them. However, BFR-10 displayed a superior effect size for SBP and DBP compared to BFR-5 minutes. Conclusion: Based on the present study results, the time under BFR during resistance exercise does not affect blood pressure response in normotensive subjects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of different weekly frequencies of plyometric-jump and linear-sprint training on youth male futsal athlete’s physical fitness Comprimento do fascículo muscular obtido pela ultrassonografia panorâmica e estimado por equações de predição Effect of whole-body vibration on cardiac function and functionality in patients with chronic non-communicable disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Reabilitação cardiovascular aumenta qualidade de vida e capacidade de exercício após ablação cardíaca de pacientes com fibrilação atrial Existe vantagem na unificação dos conceitos de sarcopenia e dinapenia em pacientes com obesidade sarcopênica eletivos à cirurgia bariátrica? Uma revisão conceitual
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1