分析

Hans-Jochen Bartsch, Michael Sachs
{"title":"分析","authors":"Hans-Jochen Bartsch, Michael Sachs","doi":"10.3139/9783446457065.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is an attempt to delineate the temporal properties of three seemingly similar connectives in Japanese, namely, —tara, tokoro and toki (all roughly equivalent to 'when'). The method employed to carry out the analysis is a comparative method based on the following seven criteria shared by these connectives: 1. Temporality versus Conditionality 2. Particles Following 3. Tense/Aspect sequences in SI (subordinate clause) and S2 (main clause) 4. Subjects in S1 and S2 5. VoIitionality versus Non-Volitionality 6. Time gap between El (subordinate clause event) and E2 (main clause event) 7. Continuity between El and E2 Pragmatic factors By way of this comparative analysis, it has been possible not only to spell out the common properties shared by these three connectives but it has also become evident that they cannot always be used interchangeably.","PeriodicalId":124303,"journal":{"name":"Kleine Formelsammlung Mathematik","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hans-Jochen Bartsch, Michael Sachs\",\"doi\":\"10.3139/9783446457065.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is an attempt to delineate the temporal properties of three seemingly similar connectives in Japanese, namely, —tara, tokoro and toki (all roughly equivalent to 'when'). The method employed to carry out the analysis is a comparative method based on the following seven criteria shared by these connectives: 1. Temporality versus Conditionality 2. Particles Following 3. Tense/Aspect sequences in SI (subordinate clause) and S2 (main clause) 4. Subjects in S1 and S2 5. VoIitionality versus Non-Volitionality 6. Time gap between El (subordinate clause event) and E2 (main clause event) 7. Continuity between El and E2 Pragmatic factors By way of this comparative analysis, it has been possible not only to spell out the common properties shared by these three connectives but it has also become evident that they cannot always be used interchangeably.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kleine Formelsammlung Mathematik\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kleine Formelsammlung Mathematik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446457065.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kleine Formelsammlung Mathematik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446457065.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图描述日语中三个看似相似的连接词,即-tara, tokoro和toki(都大致相当于“当”)的时间特性。进行分析的方法是基于这些连接词共有的以下七个标准的比较法:1。时间性与条件性2。粒子跟随3。4. SI(从句)和S2(主句)中的时态/时态序列S1及S2科目意志性与非意志性El(从句事件)与E2(主句事件)的时间差通过这种比较分析,我们不仅可以找出这三个连接词的共同特征,而且可以清楚地看到,它们并不总是可以互换使用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis
This paper is an attempt to delineate the temporal properties of three seemingly similar connectives in Japanese, namely, —tara, tokoro and toki (all roughly equivalent to 'when'). The method employed to carry out the analysis is a comparative method based on the following seven criteria shared by these connectives: 1. Temporality versus Conditionality 2. Particles Following 3. Tense/Aspect sequences in SI (subordinate clause) and S2 (main clause) 4. Subjects in S1 and S2 5. VoIitionality versus Non-Volitionality 6. Time gap between El (subordinate clause event) and E2 (main clause event) 7. Continuity between El and E2 Pragmatic factors By way of this comparative analysis, it has been possible not only to spell out the common properties shared by these three connectives but it has also become evident that they cannot always be used interchangeably.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reihen, Integral-Transformationen Elementare und analytische Geometrie Gewöhnliche Differenzialgleichungen Logik, Arithmetik, Algebra Statistik, Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1