J48决策树与减错剪枝的性能比较

Hoon Jin, Yong-Gyu Jung
{"title":"J48决策树与减错剪枝的性能比较","authors":"Hoon Jin, Yong-Gyu Jung","doi":"10.7236/IJASC.2016.5.1.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advent of big data, data mining is more increasingly utilized in various decision-making fields by extracting hidden and meaningful information from large amounts of data. Even as exponential increase of the request of unrevealing the hidden meaning behind data, it becomes more and more important to decide to select which data mining algorithm and how to use it. There are several mainly used data mining algorithms in biology and clinics highlighted; Logistic regression, Neural networks, Supportvector machine, and variety of statistical techniques. In this paper it is attempted to compare the classification performance of an exemplary algorithm J48 and REPTree of ML algorithms. It is confirmed that more accurate classification algorithm is provided by the performance comparison results. More accurate prediction is possible with the algorithm for the goal of experiment. Based on this, it is expected to be relatively difficult visually detailed classification and distinction. program or a training learning act to optimize the parameters of the model. The learned model can predict the results from the new data have never met in the learning process. In this paper, we compare the performance of the algorithm proceeds separation is made based on the ML. Machine learning is used to predict the","PeriodicalId":297506,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of Decision Trees of J48 and Reduced-Error Pruning\",\"authors\":\"Hoon Jin, Yong-Gyu Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.7236/IJASC.2016.5.1.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the advent of big data, data mining is more increasingly utilized in various decision-making fields by extracting hidden and meaningful information from large amounts of data. Even as exponential increase of the request of unrevealing the hidden meaning behind data, it becomes more and more important to decide to select which data mining algorithm and how to use it. There are several mainly used data mining algorithms in biology and clinics highlighted; Logistic regression, Neural networks, Supportvector machine, and variety of statistical techniques. In this paper it is attempted to compare the classification performance of an exemplary algorithm J48 and REPTree of ML algorithms. It is confirmed that more accurate classification algorithm is provided by the performance comparison results. More accurate prediction is possible with the algorithm for the goal of experiment. Based on this, it is expected to be relatively difficult visually detailed classification and distinction. program or a training learning act to optimize the parameters of the model. The learned model can predict the results from the new data have never met in the learning process. In this paper, we compare the performance of the algorithm proceeds separation is made based on the ML. Machine learning is used to predict the\",\"PeriodicalId\":297506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7236/IJASC.2016.5.1.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7236/IJASC.2016.5.1.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着大数据的出现,数据挖掘从大量数据中提取隐藏的、有意义的信息,越来越多地应用于各个决策领域。随着揭示数据背后隐藏意义的要求呈指数级增长,选择哪种数据挖掘算法以及如何使用算法变得越来越重要。重点介绍了几种主要应用于生物学和临床的数据挖掘算法;逻辑回归,神经网络,支持向量机,和各种统计技术。本文试图比较示例算法J48和ML算法的REPTree的分类性能。性能对比结果证实,提供了更准确的分类算法。以实验为目标,采用该算法可以实现更精确的预测。在此基础上,预计在视觉上比较难进行详细的分类和区分。程序或训练学习行为来优化模型的参数。学习到的模型可以从学习过程中从未遇到过的新数据中预测结果。在本文中,我们比较了算法的性能,并基于机器学习进行了分离
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Comparison of Decision Trees of J48 and Reduced-Error Pruning
With the advent of big data, data mining is more increasingly utilized in various decision-making fields by extracting hidden and meaningful information from large amounts of data. Even as exponential increase of the request of unrevealing the hidden meaning behind data, it becomes more and more important to decide to select which data mining algorithm and how to use it. There are several mainly used data mining algorithms in biology and clinics highlighted; Logistic regression, Neural networks, Supportvector machine, and variety of statistical techniques. In this paper it is attempted to compare the classification performance of an exemplary algorithm J48 and REPTree of ML algorithms. It is confirmed that more accurate classification algorithm is provided by the performance comparison results. More accurate prediction is possible with the algorithm for the goal of experiment. Based on this, it is expected to be relatively difficult visually detailed classification and distinction. program or a training learning act to optimize the parameters of the model. The learned model can predict the results from the new data have never met in the learning process. In this paper, we compare the performance of the algorithm proceeds separation is made based on the ML. Machine learning is used to predict the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design for Automation System for Pharmaceutical Prescription Using Arduino and Optical Character Recognition A Study on the Contents Security Management Model for Multi-platform Users A Study on the meaning of work and job embeddedness affecting the creative behavior of organization members The Structural Relationship among Selection Attributes, Consumption Value Brand Attitude, Fun, Brand Loyalty and Quality of Life in Athleisure Improved BP-NN Controller of PMSM for Speed Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1