摘要:SV-BR-1-GM,一种治疗晚期乳腺癌的全细胞靶向免疫疗法:反应的药效学标志物

M. Lacher, Sanne Graeve, V. Sunkari, D. Adams, Cha-Mei Tang, P. Amstutz, C. Wiseman, G. Peoples, W. Williams
{"title":"摘要:SV-BR-1-GM,一种治疗晚期乳腺癌的全细胞靶向免疫疗法:反应的药效学标志物","authors":"M. Lacher, Sanne Graeve, V. Sunkari, D. Adams, Cha-Mei Tang, P. Amstutz, C. Wiseman, G. Peoples, W. Williams","doi":"10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-A012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: SV-BR-1-GM is a GM-CSF-engineered breast cancer cell line employed – after irradiation – as a targeted immunotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Tumor regressions at metastatic sites have been observed, most notably in patients with HLA allele matches to the cell line. We are assessing SV-BR-1-GM in the phase IIa portion of a phase I/IIa clinical trial in metastatic and locally recurrent breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03066947). Additionally, we are co-developing a companion diagnostic (BriaDX™) to identify patients likely to respond to SV-BR-1-GM. Currently, BriaDX™ consists of HLA typing; however, we have begun assessing biomarkers in sera, lymphocyte characteristics, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) from patients collected at baseline and after inoculation of SV-BR-1-GM to layer in additional components to improve accuracy, with the number/subtyping of CTCs and CAMLs being prognostic indicators. Methods: Subjects are pretreated with low-dose cyclophosphamide to reduce immune suppression. SV-BR-1-GM is inoculated intradermally with follow-up local injections of IFNα2. Cycles are every 2 weeks x 3, then monthly. HLA typing was conducted via LabType R-SSO Kits (One Lambda). Cytokines were measured via single- or multiplex assays. Anti-SV-BR-1 antibodies were determined by incubation of SV-BR-1 cells with diluted patient sera followed by staining with a fluorescently-labeled anti-IgG antibody and detection by flow cytometry. CTCs and CAMLs were evaluated by CellSieve™ at Creatv MicroTech. Results: To date, 16 clinical trial subjects have been inoculated with the SV-BR-1-GM regimen as rescue immunotherapy. All were treatment refractory and had received a median of 4.5 prior chemo/biologic therapy regimens (range 1-13). Two of the 16 patients remained on study for ≥3 months (5 cycles) with 4 patients currently on study not having reached the 3-month evaluation time point. Objective regression of tumor was seen in 2 subjects. One subject had virtually complete regression of 20 of 20 lung metastases noted at 3 and 6 months (but with progressive bone and liver metastases). Another subject had improvement of chest wall metastases and quality of life but expired due to nontreatment-related causes. Response appeared to correlate with HLA allele-matching to SV-BR-1-GM. Anti-SV-BR-1 antibody titers increased in several patients. Among the cytokines assessed, interleukin (IL)-8 levels increased in HLA-DRB3 allele-matched subjects after SV-BR-1-GM inoculation. Of 15 patients evaluated, CTCs were present in 6 patients at baseline while CAMLs were present in all 15. Five of 5 patients evaluated for PD-L1 expression had mostly low-to-medium expression of PD-L1 on their CTCs/CAMLs. In the patient who had regression of lung metastases but progression of liver metastases, PD-L1 expression and maximum CAML size increased, but the number of CAMLs decreased during treatment. CAML number also decreased in a patient who reached the 3-month evaluation visit without progression and in a patient with inflammatory breast cancer who dropped out due to worsening inflammation. Conclusions: In addition to the patients’ HLA types, several pharmacodynamic parameters correlated with tumor regression and/or HLA matching status. CTCs or CAMLs are frequently detectable in this population, and PD-L1 expression appears common on these cells. Both CAML number and size appear to correlate with response, though larger studies are needed. Future steps include evaluation of SV-BR-1-GM with checkpoint inhibitors. Citation Format: Markus D. Lacher, Sanne Graeve, Vivekananda (Vivek) Sunkari, Daniel L. Adams, Cha-Mei Tang, Pete Amstutz, Charles L. Wiseman, George E. Peoples, William V. Williams. SV-BR-1-GM, a whole-cell targeted immunotherapy for advanced breast cancer: Pharmacodynamic markers of response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A012.","PeriodicalId":244081,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials of Cancer Immunotherapies","volume":"394 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract A012: SV-BR-1-GM, a whole-cell targeted immunotherapy for advanced breast cancer: Pharmacodynamic markers of response\",\"authors\":\"M. Lacher, Sanne Graeve, V. Sunkari, D. Adams, Cha-Mei Tang, P. Amstutz, C. Wiseman, G. Peoples, W. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-A012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: SV-BR-1-GM is a GM-CSF-engineered breast cancer cell line employed – after irradiation – as a targeted immunotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Tumor regressions at metastatic sites have been observed, most notably in patients with HLA allele matches to the cell line. We are assessing SV-BR-1-GM in the phase IIa portion of a phase I/IIa clinical trial in metastatic and locally recurrent breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03066947). Additionally, we are co-developing a companion diagnostic (BriaDX™) to identify patients likely to respond to SV-BR-1-GM. Currently, BriaDX™ consists of HLA typing; however, we have begun assessing biomarkers in sera, lymphocyte characteristics, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) from patients collected at baseline and after inoculation of SV-BR-1-GM to layer in additional components to improve accuracy, with the number/subtyping of CTCs and CAMLs being prognostic indicators. Methods: Subjects are pretreated with low-dose cyclophosphamide to reduce immune suppression. SV-BR-1-GM is inoculated intradermally with follow-up local injections of IFNα2. Cycles are every 2 weeks x 3, then monthly. HLA typing was conducted via LabType R-SSO Kits (One Lambda). Cytokines were measured via single- or multiplex assays. Anti-SV-BR-1 antibodies were determined by incubation of SV-BR-1 cells with diluted patient sera followed by staining with a fluorescently-labeled anti-IgG antibody and detection by flow cytometry. CTCs and CAMLs were evaluated by CellSieve™ at Creatv MicroTech. Results: To date, 16 clinical trial subjects have been inoculated with the SV-BR-1-GM regimen as rescue immunotherapy. All were treatment refractory and had received a median of 4.5 prior chemo/biologic therapy regimens (range 1-13). Two of the 16 patients remained on study for ≥3 months (5 cycles) with 4 patients currently on study not having reached the 3-month evaluation time point. Objective regression of tumor was seen in 2 subjects. One subject had virtually complete regression of 20 of 20 lung metastases noted at 3 and 6 months (but with progressive bone and liver metastases). Another subject had improvement of chest wall metastases and quality of life but expired due to nontreatment-related causes. Response appeared to correlate with HLA allele-matching to SV-BR-1-GM. Anti-SV-BR-1 antibody titers increased in several patients. Among the cytokines assessed, interleukin (IL)-8 levels increased in HLA-DRB3 allele-matched subjects after SV-BR-1-GM inoculation. Of 15 patients evaluated, CTCs were present in 6 patients at baseline while CAMLs were present in all 15. Five of 5 patients evaluated for PD-L1 expression had mostly low-to-medium expression of PD-L1 on their CTCs/CAMLs. In the patient who had regression of lung metastases but progression of liver metastases, PD-L1 expression and maximum CAML size increased, but the number of CAMLs decreased during treatment. CAML number also decreased in a patient who reached the 3-month evaluation visit without progression and in a patient with inflammatory breast cancer who dropped out due to worsening inflammation. Conclusions: In addition to the patients’ HLA types, several pharmacodynamic parameters correlated with tumor regression and/or HLA matching status. CTCs or CAMLs are frequently detectable in this population, and PD-L1 expression appears common on these cells. Both CAML number and size appear to correlate with response, though larger studies are needed. Future steps include evaluation of SV-BR-1-GM with checkpoint inhibitors. Citation Format: Markus D. Lacher, Sanne Graeve, Vivekananda (Vivek) Sunkari, Daniel L. Adams, Cha-Mei Tang, Pete Amstutz, Charles L. Wiseman, George E. Peoples, William V. Williams. SV-BR-1-GM, a whole-cell targeted immunotherapy for advanced breast cancer: Pharmacodynamic markers of response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A012.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Trials of Cancer Immunotherapies\",\"volume\":\"394 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Trials of Cancer Immunotherapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-A012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials of Cancer Immunotherapies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-A012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:SV-BR-1-GM是一种gm - csf工程的乳腺癌细胞系,经照射后可作为晚期乳腺癌的靶向免疫治疗。已经观察到转移部位的肿瘤消退,最明显的是HLA等位基因与细胞系匹配的患者。我们正在转移性和局部复发性乳腺癌(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT03066947)的I/IIa期临床试验中评估SV-BR-1-GM。此外,我们正在共同开发一种伴随诊断(BriaDX™),以识别可能对SV-BR-1-GM有反应的患者。目前,BriaDX™包括HLA分型;然而,我们已经开始评估基线和接种SV-BR-1-GM后收集的患者血清、淋巴细胞特征、循环肿瘤细胞(CTCs)和癌症相关巨噬细胞样细胞(caml)中的生物标志物,以添加其他成分以提高准确性,CTCs和caml的数量/亚型作为预后指标。方法:采用低剂量环磷酰胺预处理,减轻免疫抑制。SV-BR-1-GM皮下接种,随后局部注射IFNα2。周期是每2周× 3次,然后是每月一次。HLA分型采用LabType R-SSO试剂盒(One Lambda)。细胞因子通过单一或多重测定来测定。通过将SV-BR-1细胞与稀释的患者血清孵育,然后用荧光标记的抗igg抗体染色,流式细胞术检测抗SV-BR-1抗体。CTCs和caml采用Creatv MicroTech公司的CellSieve™进行评估。结果:迄今为止,已有16名临床试验受试者接种了SV-BR-1-GM方案作为救援免疫治疗。所有患者均为难治性患者,既往化疗/生物治疗方案中位数为4.5次(范围1-13次)。16例患者中有2例仍在研究中≥3个月(5个周期),目前有4例患者在研究中尚未达到3个月的评估时间点。目的:2例患者肿瘤消退。一名受试者在3个月和6个月时发现20个肺转移灶中的20个几乎完全消退(但伴有进行性骨和肝转移)。另一名患者的胸壁转移和生活质量有所改善,但由于与治疗无关的原因而死亡。应答似乎与SV-BR-1-GM的HLA等位基因匹配有关。一些患者的抗sv - br -1抗体滴度升高。在所评估的细胞因子中,接种SV-BR-1-GM后,HLA-DRB3等位基因匹配的受试者中白细胞介素(IL)-8水平升高。在评估的15例患者中,基线时6例患者存在ctc,而所有15例患者均存在caml。5例评估PD-L1表达的患者中有5例在其ctc / caml上的PD-L1表达大多为低至中水平。在肺转移消退而肝转移进展的患者中,治疗期间PD-L1表达和最大CAML大小增加,但CAML数量减少。在一名达到3个月评估访问且无进展的患者和一名因炎症恶化而退出的炎性乳腺癌患者中,CAML数量也有所减少。结论:除了患者的HLA类型外,一些药效学参数与肿瘤消退和/或HLA匹配状态相关。ctc或caml在该人群中经常检测到,PD-L1表达在这些细胞中很常见。CAML的数量和大小似乎都与反应有关,尽管还需要更大规模的研究。未来的步骤包括评估SV-BR-1-GM与检查点抑制剂。引用格式:Markus D. Lacher, Sanne Graeve, Vivekananda (Vivek) Sunkari, Daniel L. Adams, Cha-Mei Tang, Pete Amstutz, Charles L. Wiseman, George E. Peoples, William V. Williams晚期乳腺癌全细胞靶向免疫疗法SV-BR-1-GM:反应的药效学标志物[摘要]。第四届CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR国际癌症免疫治疗会议:将科学转化为生存;2018年9月30日至10月3日;纽约,纽约。费城(PA): AACR;癌症免疫学杂志2019;7(2增刊):摘要nr A012。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abstract A012: SV-BR-1-GM, a whole-cell targeted immunotherapy for advanced breast cancer: Pharmacodynamic markers of response
Background: SV-BR-1-GM is a GM-CSF-engineered breast cancer cell line employed – after irradiation – as a targeted immunotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Tumor regressions at metastatic sites have been observed, most notably in patients with HLA allele matches to the cell line. We are assessing SV-BR-1-GM in the phase IIa portion of a phase I/IIa clinical trial in metastatic and locally recurrent breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03066947). Additionally, we are co-developing a companion diagnostic (BriaDX™) to identify patients likely to respond to SV-BR-1-GM. Currently, BriaDX™ consists of HLA typing; however, we have begun assessing biomarkers in sera, lymphocyte characteristics, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) from patients collected at baseline and after inoculation of SV-BR-1-GM to layer in additional components to improve accuracy, with the number/subtyping of CTCs and CAMLs being prognostic indicators. Methods: Subjects are pretreated with low-dose cyclophosphamide to reduce immune suppression. SV-BR-1-GM is inoculated intradermally with follow-up local injections of IFNα2. Cycles are every 2 weeks x 3, then monthly. HLA typing was conducted via LabType R-SSO Kits (One Lambda). Cytokines were measured via single- or multiplex assays. Anti-SV-BR-1 antibodies were determined by incubation of SV-BR-1 cells with diluted patient sera followed by staining with a fluorescently-labeled anti-IgG antibody and detection by flow cytometry. CTCs and CAMLs were evaluated by CellSieve™ at Creatv MicroTech. Results: To date, 16 clinical trial subjects have been inoculated with the SV-BR-1-GM regimen as rescue immunotherapy. All were treatment refractory and had received a median of 4.5 prior chemo/biologic therapy regimens (range 1-13). Two of the 16 patients remained on study for ≥3 months (5 cycles) with 4 patients currently on study not having reached the 3-month evaluation time point. Objective regression of tumor was seen in 2 subjects. One subject had virtually complete regression of 20 of 20 lung metastases noted at 3 and 6 months (but with progressive bone and liver metastases). Another subject had improvement of chest wall metastases and quality of life but expired due to nontreatment-related causes. Response appeared to correlate with HLA allele-matching to SV-BR-1-GM. Anti-SV-BR-1 antibody titers increased in several patients. Among the cytokines assessed, interleukin (IL)-8 levels increased in HLA-DRB3 allele-matched subjects after SV-BR-1-GM inoculation. Of 15 patients evaluated, CTCs were present in 6 patients at baseline while CAMLs were present in all 15. Five of 5 patients evaluated for PD-L1 expression had mostly low-to-medium expression of PD-L1 on their CTCs/CAMLs. In the patient who had regression of lung metastases but progression of liver metastases, PD-L1 expression and maximum CAML size increased, but the number of CAMLs decreased during treatment. CAML number also decreased in a patient who reached the 3-month evaluation visit without progression and in a patient with inflammatory breast cancer who dropped out due to worsening inflammation. Conclusions: In addition to the patients’ HLA types, several pharmacodynamic parameters correlated with tumor regression and/or HLA matching status. CTCs or CAMLs are frequently detectable in this population, and PD-L1 expression appears common on these cells. Both CAML number and size appear to correlate with response, though larger studies are needed. Future steps include evaluation of SV-BR-1-GM with checkpoint inhibitors. Citation Format: Markus D. Lacher, Sanne Graeve, Vivekananda (Vivek) Sunkari, Daniel L. Adams, Cha-Mei Tang, Pete Amstutz, Charles L. Wiseman, George E. Peoples, William V. Williams. SV-BR-1-GM, a whole-cell targeted immunotherapy for advanced breast cancer: Pharmacodynamic markers of response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A012.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract A006: Phase 1 study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of MEDI4736 (durvalumab, durva) + tremelimumab (treme) in patients with advanced solid tumors Abstract A021: Vaccination with autologous, nonattenuated, live glioblastoma cells induces potent peripheral and intratumoral anti-tumoral responses: A first-in-human study Abstract A010: Personalized neoantigen-targeting vaccines for high-risk melanoma generate epitope spreading Abstract A016: PEGylated IL-10 (pegilodecakin) induces systemic immune activation, CD8+ T-cell invigoration and polyclonal T-cell expansion in cancer patients Abstract A008: Neoadjuvant nivolumab, gemcitabine and cisplatin in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Study update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1