6829张磁共振图像显示,与性别、年龄或关节炎程度无关,股骨外侧髁相对于内侧髁发育不全

R. Shah, T. Vail, S. Bini
{"title":"6829张磁共振图像显示,与性别、年龄或关节炎程度无关,股骨外侧髁相对于内侧髁发育不全","authors":"R. Shah, T. Vail, S. Bini","doi":"10.60118/001c.68135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the relationship between the radii of the medial/lateral femoral condyles (MFC/LFC respectively) is important for restoring kinematics in knee arthroplasty. The objective of this study is to use a large cohort of patient magnetic resonance Images (MRIs) to investigate whether asymmetry exists between the radii of the medial/lateral femoral condyles. Patients recruited into the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) with knee MRIs were included. Using a validated machine learning algorithm, the radii of each condyle was calculated. The study sample was split into cohorts depending on medial and lateral compartment wear patterns of each knee in addition to their KL classification. The radii of each condyle in each cohort were compared using paired t-tests. Finally, a multivariable regression was run to evaluate factors that could impact differences between medial/lateral condylar size. 6,829 MRIs were included in this study of which 89% were classified as varus knees. The average best fit radius of the MFC was significantly smaller than that of the LFC (15.3mm vs. 16.8mm, p<0.001) in general and in patient knees with medial wear with KL 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 and patient knees with lateral wear with KL 0, 2, 3, and 4. After adjusting for age, BMI, and Gender, patients with lateral wear patterns and patients with increasing KL score had a statistically significant larger lateral condylar size. ML was effectively used to automate the measurement of femoral condyle size suggesting that the LCF has a slightly larger radius than the MFC and is not hypoplastic.","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Lateral Femoral Condyle is not Hypoplastic Relative to the Medial Condyle in 6829 Magnetic Resonance Images Irrespective of Gender, Age, or Extent of Arthritis\",\"authors\":\"R. Shah, T. Vail, S. Bini\",\"doi\":\"10.60118/001c.68135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the relationship between the radii of the medial/lateral femoral condyles (MFC/LFC respectively) is important for restoring kinematics in knee arthroplasty. The objective of this study is to use a large cohort of patient magnetic resonance Images (MRIs) to investigate whether asymmetry exists between the radii of the medial/lateral femoral condyles. Patients recruited into the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) with knee MRIs were included. Using a validated machine learning algorithm, the radii of each condyle was calculated. The study sample was split into cohorts depending on medial and lateral compartment wear patterns of each knee in addition to their KL classification. The radii of each condyle in each cohort were compared using paired t-tests. Finally, a multivariable regression was run to evaluate factors that could impact differences between medial/lateral condylar size. 6,829 MRIs were included in this study of which 89% were classified as varus knees. The average best fit radius of the MFC was significantly smaller than that of the LFC (15.3mm vs. 16.8mm, p<0.001) in general and in patient knees with medial wear with KL 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 and patient knees with lateral wear with KL 0, 2, 3, and 4. After adjusting for age, BMI, and Gender, patients with lateral wear patterns and patients with increasing KL score had a statistically significant larger lateral condylar size. ML was effectively used to automate the measurement of femoral condyle size suggesting that the LCF has a slightly larger radius than the MFC and is not hypoplastic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.68135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.68135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

了解股骨内侧/外侧髁(分别为MFC/LFC)半径之间的关系对于膝关节置换术中恢复运动学非常重要。本研究的目的是使用大量患者磁共振图像(mri)来调查股骨内髁/外侧髁桡骨之间是否存在不对称。纳入骨关节炎倡议(OAI)并进行膝关节mri的患者。使用经过验证的机器学习算法,计算每个髁的半径。研究样本根据每个膝关节的内侧和外侧隔室磨损模式以及他们的KL分类被分成队列。每个队列中每个髁突的半径采用配对t检验进行比较。最后,采用多变量回归评估可能影响内外侧髁大小差异的因素。6829例mri纳入本研究,其中89%归类为膝内翻。总的来说,MFC的平均最佳配合半径明显小于LFC (15.3mm vs. 16.8mm, p<0.001),内侧磨损为KL 0、1、2、3和4的患者和外侧磨损为KL 0、2、3和4的患者的膝关节也明显小于LFC (15.3mm vs. 16.8mm, p<0.001)。在调整年龄、BMI和性别后,有外侧磨损模式的患者和KL评分增加的患者的外侧髁尺寸有统计学意义上的较大。ML被有效地用于自动测量股骨髁的大小,这表明LCF的半径比MFC略大,并且没有发育不良。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Lateral Femoral Condyle is not Hypoplastic Relative to the Medial Condyle in 6829 Magnetic Resonance Images Irrespective of Gender, Age, or Extent of Arthritis
Understanding the relationship between the radii of the medial/lateral femoral condyles (MFC/LFC respectively) is important for restoring kinematics in knee arthroplasty. The objective of this study is to use a large cohort of patient magnetic resonance Images (MRIs) to investigate whether asymmetry exists between the radii of the medial/lateral femoral condyles. Patients recruited into the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) with knee MRIs were included. Using a validated machine learning algorithm, the radii of each condyle was calculated. The study sample was split into cohorts depending on medial and lateral compartment wear patterns of each knee in addition to their KL classification. The radii of each condyle in each cohort were compared using paired t-tests. Finally, a multivariable regression was run to evaluate factors that could impact differences between medial/lateral condylar size. 6,829 MRIs were included in this study of which 89% were classified as varus knees. The average best fit radius of the MFC was significantly smaller than that of the LFC (15.3mm vs. 16.8mm, p<0.001) in general and in patient knees with medial wear with KL 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 and patient knees with lateral wear with KL 0, 2, 3, and 4. After adjusting for age, BMI, and Gender, patients with lateral wear patterns and patients with increasing KL score had a statistically significant larger lateral condylar size. ML was effectively used to automate the measurement of femoral condyle size suggesting that the LCF has a slightly larger radius than the MFC and is not hypoplastic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“In My Experience…15 Data Points To Better Evaluate Platelet Rich Plasma Kits And Protocols” “In My Experience…Mentorship in Orthopaedic Surgery” A New Paradigm in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis and Arthroplasty with Dynamic Patient-source Outcome Measures: Comprehensive Clinical Review of the Knee Kinesiography Exam with the KneeKG® System Latarjet Classics: An Analysis of The 50 Most-Cited Articles on The Latarjet Procedure “In My Experience…Medical Device Design & Innovation in Shoulder Replacements”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1