B. Nitzberg, C. Kuszmaul, I. Stockdale, J. Becker, John Jiang, P. Wong
{"title":"p - mesh——一种基于商品的集群可扩展网络架构","authors":"B. Nitzberg, C. Kuszmaul, I. Stockdale, J. Becker, John Jiang, P. Wong","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.1999.773070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We designed a new network architecture, the P-Mesh, which combines the scalability and fault resilience of a torus with the performance of a switch. We compare the scalability, performance and cost of the hub, switch, torus, tree and P-Mesh architectures. The latter three are capable of scaling to thousands of nodes. However, the torus has severe performance limitations with that many processors. The tree and P-Mesh have similar latency, bandwidth and mid-bisection bandwidth, but the P-Mesh outperforms the switch architecture (a lower bound for tree performance) on 16-node NAS parallel benchmark tests by up to 23%, and costs 40% less. Furthermore, the P-Mesh has better fault resilience characteristics. The P-Mesh architecture trades increased management overhead for lower cost, and is a good bridging technology, while the price of tree uplinks is expensive.","PeriodicalId":116821,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The P-Mesh-a commodity-based scalable network architecture for clusters\",\"authors\":\"B. Nitzberg, C. Kuszmaul, I. Stockdale, J. Becker, John Jiang, P. Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.1999.773070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We designed a new network architecture, the P-Mesh, which combines the scalability and fault resilience of a torus with the performance of a switch. We compare the scalability, performance and cost of the hub, switch, torus, tree and P-Mesh architectures. The latter three are capable of scaling to thousands of nodes. However, the torus has severe performance limitations with that many processors. The tree and P-Mesh have similar latency, bandwidth and mid-bisection bandwidth, but the P-Mesh outperforms the switch architecture (a lower bound for tree performance) on 16-node NAS parallel benchmark tests by up to 23%, and costs 40% less. Furthermore, the P-Mesh has better fault resilience characteristics. The P-Mesh architecture trades increased management overhead for lower cost, and is a good bridging technology, while the price of tree uplinks is expensive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":116821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1999.773070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1999.773070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The P-Mesh-a commodity-based scalable network architecture for clusters
We designed a new network architecture, the P-Mesh, which combines the scalability and fault resilience of a torus with the performance of a switch. We compare the scalability, performance and cost of the hub, switch, torus, tree and P-Mesh architectures. The latter three are capable of scaling to thousands of nodes. However, the torus has severe performance limitations with that many processors. The tree and P-Mesh have similar latency, bandwidth and mid-bisection bandwidth, but the P-Mesh outperforms the switch architecture (a lower bound for tree performance) on 16-node NAS parallel benchmark tests by up to 23%, and costs 40% less. Furthermore, the P-Mesh has better fault resilience characteristics. The P-Mesh architecture trades increased management overhead for lower cost, and is a good bridging technology, while the price of tree uplinks is expensive.