{"title":"家族拥有或管理的高等教育机构:高等教育的一个关键维度?","authors":"Edward Choi, P. Altbach, M. Allen","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2022.2101507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n The commitment of managerial families to educational endeavours has significant implications for society. This analysis provides a comparative perspective on the role and continuity of family-owned or – managed higher education institutions. Also discussed are the benefits (and challenges) linked to their special organisational character, shaped by on the one hand the distinctive managerial agency of a kinship group and, on the other hand, the norms rooted in academe. We present national overviews of three countries at different stages of higher education maturation, South Korea, Brazil, and Ethiopia. The comparative examples shed light on in particular the varied environmental factors that threaten or encourage the continuity of these organisations. A more optimistic outlook persists in the cases of Ethiopia and Brazil, which unlike Korea represent emerging economies where increased higher education capacity may be needed relative to the potential future growth in demand. We add to the country overviews a case study of a family-based institution to contextualise the normative understandings of managerial kinship behaviours and motivations. Comparative examples are also introduced to capture the nuanced characteristics of these institutions. This analysis concludes by discussing the sustainability of the family-based leadership model and the implications of national policy on their continuity.","PeriodicalId":212965,"journal":{"name":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family-owned or -managed higher education institutions: a key dimension in higher education?\",\"authors\":\"Edward Choi, P. Altbach, M. Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23322969.2022.2101507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n The commitment of managerial families to educational endeavours has significant implications for society. This analysis provides a comparative perspective on the role and continuity of family-owned or – managed higher education institutions. Also discussed are the benefits (and challenges) linked to their special organisational character, shaped by on the one hand the distinctive managerial agency of a kinship group and, on the other hand, the norms rooted in academe. We present national overviews of three countries at different stages of higher education maturation, South Korea, Brazil, and Ethiopia. The comparative examples shed light on in particular the varied environmental factors that threaten or encourage the continuity of these organisations. A more optimistic outlook persists in the cases of Ethiopia and Brazil, which unlike Korea represent emerging economies where increased higher education capacity may be needed relative to the potential future growth in demand. We add to the country overviews a case study of a family-based institution to contextualise the normative understandings of managerial kinship behaviours and motivations. Comparative examples are also introduced to capture the nuanced characteristics of these institutions. This analysis concludes by discussing the sustainability of the family-based leadership model and the implications of national policy on their continuity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy Reviews in Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy Reviews in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2022.2101507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2022.2101507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Family-owned or -managed higher education institutions: a key dimension in higher education?
ABSTRACT
The commitment of managerial families to educational endeavours has significant implications for society. This analysis provides a comparative perspective on the role and continuity of family-owned or – managed higher education institutions. Also discussed are the benefits (and challenges) linked to their special organisational character, shaped by on the one hand the distinctive managerial agency of a kinship group and, on the other hand, the norms rooted in academe. We present national overviews of three countries at different stages of higher education maturation, South Korea, Brazil, and Ethiopia. The comparative examples shed light on in particular the varied environmental factors that threaten or encourage the continuity of these organisations. A more optimistic outlook persists in the cases of Ethiopia and Brazil, which unlike Korea represent emerging economies where increased higher education capacity may be needed relative to the potential future growth in demand. We add to the country overviews a case study of a family-based institution to contextualise the normative understandings of managerial kinship behaviours and motivations. Comparative examples are also introduced to capture the nuanced characteristics of these institutions. This analysis concludes by discussing the sustainability of the family-based leadership model and the implications of national policy on their continuity.