SAHI与硒:比较分析

Thanuja Janarthana Naidu, Nor Asyikin Basri, Saravanan Nagenthram
{"title":"SAHI与硒:比较分析","authors":"Thanuja Janarthana Naidu, Nor Asyikin Basri, Saravanan Nagenthram","doi":"10.1109/IC3I.2014.7019594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Functional testing for wireless based graphic user interfaces is one of the most routine and basic quality verification and validation on telecommunication products. These tests are often done based on requirements and specifications set and defined by product designers and original equipment manufacturers. As manual testing consumes considerable resource, having various time-to-market periods and user scenarios, automation is vital for testing. There are several tools that could perform automation, so we have conducted a study on two of the most commonly used web automation testing tools to allow test engineers and web and wireless software developers to make an informed decision on which tools to use based on their needs and resource. Which tool would give the best user experience? Which is easier to learn and maintain? Which tool needs lesser test resources and how convenient would the setup be for multiple iteration testing cycles? These, among other questions are answered during the course of this white paper.","PeriodicalId":430848,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SAHI vs. Selenium: A comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Thanuja Janarthana Naidu, Nor Asyikin Basri, Saravanan Nagenthram\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IC3I.2014.7019594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Functional testing for wireless based graphic user interfaces is one of the most routine and basic quality verification and validation on telecommunication products. These tests are often done based on requirements and specifications set and defined by product designers and original equipment manufacturers. As manual testing consumes considerable resource, having various time-to-market periods and user scenarios, automation is vital for testing. There are several tools that could perform automation, so we have conducted a study on two of the most commonly used web automation testing tools to allow test engineers and web and wireless software developers to make an informed decision on which tools to use based on their needs and resource. Which tool would give the best user experience? Which is easier to learn and maintain? Which tool needs lesser test resources and how convenient would the setup be for multiple iteration testing cycles? These, among other questions are answered during the course of this white paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I)\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3I.2014.7019594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3I.2014.7019594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

基于无线图形用户界面的功能测试是电信产品最常规和最基本的质量验证和验证之一。这些测试通常是根据产品设计师和原始设备制造商设定和定义的要求和规格进行的。由于手动测试消耗了大量的资源,具有各种上市时间和用户场景,因此自动化对于测试至关重要。有几种工具可以执行自动化,因此我们对两种最常用的网络自动化测试工具进行了研究,以允许测试工程师、网络和无线软件开发人员根据他们的需求和资源做出明智的决定,选择使用哪种工具。哪个工具能提供最好的用户体验?哪个更容易学习和维护?哪个工具需要较少的测试资源,以及对于多个迭代测试周期的设置有多方便?这些问题以及其他问题将在本白皮书的过程中得到解答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SAHI vs. Selenium: A comparative analysis
Functional testing for wireless based graphic user interfaces is one of the most routine and basic quality verification and validation on telecommunication products. These tests are often done based on requirements and specifications set and defined by product designers and original equipment manufacturers. As manual testing consumes considerable resource, having various time-to-market periods and user scenarios, automation is vital for testing. There are several tools that could perform automation, so we have conducted a study on two of the most commonly used web automation testing tools to allow test engineers and web and wireless software developers to make an informed decision on which tools to use based on their needs and resource. Which tool would give the best user experience? Which is easier to learn and maintain? Which tool needs lesser test resources and how convenient would the setup be for multiple iteration testing cycles? These, among other questions are answered during the course of this white paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smart home and smart city solutions enabled by 5G, IoT, AAI and CoT services Video retrieval: An accurate approach based on Kirsch descriptor Microarray data classification using Fuzzy K-Nearest Neighbor Assessment of data quality in Web sites: towards a model A novel cross layer wireless mesh network protocol for distributed generation in electrical networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1