Thanuja Janarthana Naidu, Nor Asyikin Basri, Saravanan Nagenthram
{"title":"SAHI与硒:比较分析","authors":"Thanuja Janarthana Naidu, Nor Asyikin Basri, Saravanan Nagenthram","doi":"10.1109/IC3I.2014.7019594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Functional testing for wireless based graphic user interfaces is one of the most routine and basic quality verification and validation on telecommunication products. These tests are often done based on requirements and specifications set and defined by product designers and original equipment manufacturers. As manual testing consumes considerable resource, having various time-to-market periods and user scenarios, automation is vital for testing. There are several tools that could perform automation, so we have conducted a study on two of the most commonly used web automation testing tools to allow test engineers and web and wireless software developers to make an informed decision on which tools to use based on their needs and resource. Which tool would give the best user experience? Which is easier to learn and maintain? Which tool needs lesser test resources and how convenient would the setup be for multiple iteration testing cycles? These, among other questions are answered during the course of this white paper.","PeriodicalId":430848,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SAHI vs. Selenium: A comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Thanuja Janarthana Naidu, Nor Asyikin Basri, Saravanan Nagenthram\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IC3I.2014.7019594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Functional testing for wireless based graphic user interfaces is one of the most routine and basic quality verification and validation on telecommunication products. These tests are often done based on requirements and specifications set and defined by product designers and original equipment manufacturers. As manual testing consumes considerable resource, having various time-to-market periods and user scenarios, automation is vital for testing. There are several tools that could perform automation, so we have conducted a study on two of the most commonly used web automation testing tools to allow test engineers and web and wireless software developers to make an informed decision on which tools to use based on their needs and resource. Which tool would give the best user experience? Which is easier to learn and maintain? Which tool needs lesser test resources and how convenient would the setup be for multiple iteration testing cycles? These, among other questions are answered during the course of this white paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I)\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3I.2014.7019594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3I.2014.7019594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Functional testing for wireless based graphic user interfaces is one of the most routine and basic quality verification and validation on telecommunication products. These tests are often done based on requirements and specifications set and defined by product designers and original equipment manufacturers. As manual testing consumes considerable resource, having various time-to-market periods and user scenarios, automation is vital for testing. There are several tools that could perform automation, so we have conducted a study on two of the most commonly used web automation testing tools to allow test engineers and web and wireless software developers to make an informed decision on which tools to use based on their needs and resource. Which tool would give the best user experience? Which is easier to learn and maintain? Which tool needs lesser test resources and how convenient would the setup be for multiple iteration testing cycles? These, among other questions are answered during the course of this white paper.