区域的记忆或记忆的区域:当代俄罗斯区域维度中的集体记忆

D. Anikin, A. Linchenko, A. Ovchinnikov, Anastasia Yu. Pavlovskaya, A. F. Pavlovskii
{"title":"区域的记忆或记忆的区域:当代俄罗斯区域维度中的集体记忆","authors":"D. Anikin, A. Linchenko, A. Ovchinnikov, Anastasia Yu. Pavlovskaya, A. F. Pavlovskii","doi":"10.18522/2500-3224-2023-2-164-226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proposed discussion focuses on the issue of collective memory and its utilisation in the shaping of Russian regional policy. Following the ideas of Pierre Nora, as well as those who reflects on his research framework, such as Tony Judt, Alexey Miller, Vladimir Shnirelman and others, the authors of the rubric consider the shaping of regional memory basing on the examples of various regions of contemporary Russia, assuming the folding of memorial representations as a process in which different social/political/ cultural groups and actors are involved, sharing identities of different levels. Using discursive analysis along with other methods of studying collective memory, referring to narratives of various types — journalistic, artistic, official — the authors of the articles presented in the discussion consider the regional politics of memory as a developing practice, which nature, mechanisms and forms are determined by the political situation in the regions and at the macro-level. At the same time, the authors of the materials demonstrate the eclectic nature of the synthesis of commemorations of different periods of Russian history. The authors of the discussion also undertake a theoretical intervention aimed to trace the status of the memory studies themselves, whose adherents, in the context of an interdisciplinary synthesis, make attempts to determine the place of memory studies in the system of disciplines about society. At the same time, they turn to the most neglected aspects of memory studies such as the “silence of memory”, discursive practices in the study of collective memory, the role of marginalized groups, such as immigrants, in the shaping of memorial narratives. In the discussion, therefore, an attempt is made to comprehend the relationship between regional and national politics of memory that opens up new opportunities for both regional studies and the study of the politics of memory itself.","PeriodicalId":117276,"journal":{"name":"The New Past","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memory of a Region or Region of Memory: Collective Memory in the Regional Dimension of Contemporary Russia\",\"authors\":\"D. Anikin, A. Linchenko, A. Ovchinnikov, Anastasia Yu. Pavlovskaya, A. F. Pavlovskii\",\"doi\":\"10.18522/2500-3224-2023-2-164-226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The proposed discussion focuses on the issue of collective memory and its utilisation in the shaping of Russian regional policy. Following the ideas of Pierre Nora, as well as those who reflects on his research framework, such as Tony Judt, Alexey Miller, Vladimir Shnirelman and others, the authors of the rubric consider the shaping of regional memory basing on the examples of various regions of contemporary Russia, assuming the folding of memorial representations as a process in which different social/political/ cultural groups and actors are involved, sharing identities of different levels. Using discursive analysis along with other methods of studying collective memory, referring to narratives of various types — journalistic, artistic, official — the authors of the articles presented in the discussion consider the regional politics of memory as a developing practice, which nature, mechanisms and forms are determined by the political situation in the regions and at the macro-level. At the same time, the authors of the materials demonstrate the eclectic nature of the synthesis of commemorations of different periods of Russian history. The authors of the discussion also undertake a theoretical intervention aimed to trace the status of the memory studies themselves, whose adherents, in the context of an interdisciplinary synthesis, make attempts to determine the place of memory studies in the system of disciplines about society. At the same time, they turn to the most neglected aspects of memory studies such as the “silence of memory”, discursive practices in the study of collective memory, the role of marginalized groups, such as immigrants, in the shaping of memorial narratives. In the discussion, therefore, an attempt is made to comprehend the relationship between regional and national politics of memory that opens up new opportunities for both regional studies and the study of the politics of memory itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The New Past\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The New Past\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18522/2500-3224-2023-2-164-226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Past","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18522/2500-3224-2023-2-164-226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拟议讨论的重点是集体记忆问题及其在俄罗斯区域政策形成中的利用。根据皮埃尔·诺拉(Pierre Nora)的观点,以及托尼·朱特(Tony Judt)、阿列克谢·米勒(Alexey Miller)、弗拉基米尔·施尼雷尔曼(Vladimir Shnirelman)等人对其研究框架的反思,本主题的作者基于当代俄罗斯各个地区的例子,考虑了区域记忆的形成,假设纪念表征的折叠是一个过程,在这个过程中,不同的社会/政治/文化群体和行动者参与其中,分享不同层次的身份。本文作者运用话语分析和其他研究集体记忆的方法,参考各种类型的叙事——新闻、艺术、官方——认为记忆的区域政治是一种发展中的实践,其性质、机制和形式是由区域和宏观层面的政治局势决定的。与此同时,这些材料的作者展示了综合俄罗斯历史不同时期纪念活动的折衷性质。讨论的作者还进行了理论干预,旨在追踪记忆研究本身的地位,其追随者在跨学科综合的背景下,试图确定记忆研究在社会学科体系中的地位。与此同时,他们转向记忆研究中最被忽视的方面,如“记忆的沉默”、集体记忆研究中的话语实践、边缘化群体(如移民)在形成纪念叙事中的作用。因此,在讨论中,我们试图理解区域和国家记忆政治之间的关系,这为区域研究和记忆政治本身的研究开辟了新的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Memory of a Region or Region of Memory: Collective Memory in the Regional Dimension of Contemporary Russia
The proposed discussion focuses on the issue of collective memory and its utilisation in the shaping of Russian regional policy. Following the ideas of Pierre Nora, as well as those who reflects on his research framework, such as Tony Judt, Alexey Miller, Vladimir Shnirelman and others, the authors of the rubric consider the shaping of regional memory basing on the examples of various regions of contemporary Russia, assuming the folding of memorial representations as a process in which different social/political/ cultural groups and actors are involved, sharing identities of different levels. Using discursive analysis along with other methods of studying collective memory, referring to narratives of various types — journalistic, artistic, official — the authors of the articles presented in the discussion consider the regional politics of memory as a developing practice, which nature, mechanisms and forms are determined by the political situation in the regions and at the macro-level. At the same time, the authors of the materials demonstrate the eclectic nature of the synthesis of commemorations of different periods of Russian history. The authors of the discussion also undertake a theoretical intervention aimed to trace the status of the memory studies themselves, whose adherents, in the context of an interdisciplinary synthesis, make attempts to determine the place of memory studies in the system of disciplines about society. At the same time, they turn to the most neglected aspects of memory studies such as the “silence of memory”, discursive practices in the study of collective memory, the role of marginalized groups, such as immigrants, in the shaping of memorial narratives. In the discussion, therefore, an attempt is made to comprehend the relationship between regional and national politics of memory that opens up new opportunities for both regional studies and the study of the politics of memory itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Inner Radius” of the Siege of Leningrad: Multiple Localities and Heterotopy of Memory in “The Siege Book” by A. Adamovich and D. Granin The Conservative Anticlericalism of the Engineer De-Skrochowsky Caucasus Wars 18th–19th Centuries and Armenians. The Service of Armenians in the Russian Army as a Social Lift (19th–early 20th Сenturies) Some riddles of archival heuristics “Such was the Time”: V.S. Savchuk on the Fate of Historians under Totalitarianism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1