评估幼儿政策:家庭儿童投资的可评估模型

R. Azuero
{"title":"评估幼儿政策:家庭儿童投资的可评估模型","authors":"R. Azuero","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3545407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I develop and estimate a technology of skill formation nested within a collective model of household behavior to evaluate the effect of various early childhood interventions. The model incorporates different channels of parental investments in children such as time, material investments, and childcare services. I estimate the model in a novel dataset from Chile and evaluate the effects on child development of three policies currently operating in the country: cash transfers, childcare subsidies, and subsidies to child-specific goods. In Chile, as is common in various countries implementing cash transfers to poor households, women are the recipient of cash transfers in bi-parental households with the idea that cash in the hands of women translate into better child outcomes. To allow for different outcomes depending on the recipient of cash transfers, in the model, household decisions are the outcome of a bargaining process between parents with different preferences. I find that cash transfers to women have limited effect on their bargaining power and that subsidies to child-specific goods are much more effective than childcare subsidies or cash transfers. Childcare subsidies increase female labor force participation but do not raise significantly skills of children.","PeriodicalId":210669,"journal":{"name":"Labor: Human Capital eJournal","volume":"516 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Early Childhood Policies: An Estimable Model of Family Child Investments\",\"authors\":\"R. Azuero\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3545407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I develop and estimate a technology of skill formation nested within a collective model of household behavior to evaluate the effect of various early childhood interventions. The model incorporates different channels of parental investments in children such as time, material investments, and childcare services. I estimate the model in a novel dataset from Chile and evaluate the effects on child development of three policies currently operating in the country: cash transfers, childcare subsidies, and subsidies to child-specific goods. In Chile, as is common in various countries implementing cash transfers to poor households, women are the recipient of cash transfers in bi-parental households with the idea that cash in the hands of women translate into better child outcomes. To allow for different outcomes depending on the recipient of cash transfers, in the model, household decisions are the outcome of a bargaining process between parents with different preferences. I find that cash transfers to women have limited effect on their bargaining power and that subsidies to child-specific goods are much more effective than childcare subsidies or cash transfers. Childcare subsidies increase female labor force participation but do not raise significantly skills of children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor: Human Capital eJournal\",\"volume\":\"516 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor: Human Capital eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3545407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor: Human Capital eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3545407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我开发并估计了一种嵌套在家庭行为集体模型中的技能形成技术,以评估各种早期儿童干预措施的效果。该模型结合了父母对孩子的不同投资渠道,如时间、物质投资和托儿服务。我在一个来自智利的新数据集中对该模型进行了估计,并评估了该国目前实施的三项政策对儿童发展的影响:现金转移支付、儿童保育补贴和儿童专用商品补贴。在智利,与向贫困家庭实施现金转移支付的许多国家一样,在双亲家庭中,妇女是现金转移支付的接受者,因为她们认为,妇女手中的现金可以转化为更好的儿童成果。为了考虑到不同的结果取决于现金转移的接受者,在模型中,家庭决策是具有不同偏好的父母之间讨价还价过程的结果。我发现,对妇女的现金转移对她们的议价能力影响有限,对儿童专用商品的补贴比儿童保育补贴或现金转移有效得多。儿童保育补贴提高了女性的劳动参与率,但并没有显著提高儿童的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating Early Childhood Policies: An Estimable Model of Family Child Investments
I develop and estimate a technology of skill formation nested within a collective model of household behavior to evaluate the effect of various early childhood interventions. The model incorporates different channels of parental investments in children such as time, material investments, and childcare services. I estimate the model in a novel dataset from Chile and evaluate the effects on child development of three policies currently operating in the country: cash transfers, childcare subsidies, and subsidies to child-specific goods. In Chile, as is common in various countries implementing cash transfers to poor households, women are the recipient of cash transfers in bi-parental households with the idea that cash in the hands of women translate into better child outcomes. To allow for different outcomes depending on the recipient of cash transfers, in the model, household decisions are the outcome of a bargaining process between parents with different preferences. I find that cash transfers to women have limited effect on their bargaining power and that subsidies to child-specific goods are much more effective than childcare subsidies or cash transfers. Childcare subsidies increase female labor force participation but do not raise significantly skills of children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Gender Pay Gap in the Public Sector: Evidence from the Canadian Labour Force Survey Gender Differences in Reactions to Failure in High-Stakes Competition: Evidence from the National College Entrance Exam Retakes Non-compete Agreements, Wages and Efficiency: Theory and Evidence from Brazilian Football What Drives the Finance Academia Wage Premium? How Does Technical Change Affect Worker Productivity in a Multiple-Task Environment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1