{"title":"经典逻辑、直觉逻辑和仿射逻辑的统一语义和证明系统","authors":"Chuck C. Liang","doi":"10.1145/2933575.2933581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper modifies our previous work in combining classical logic with intuitionistic logic [16], [17] to also include affine linear logic, resulting in a system we call Affine Control Logic. A propositional system with six binary connectives is defined and given a phase space interpretation. Choosing classical, intuitionistic or affine reasoning is entirely dependent on the subformula property. Moreover, the connectives of these logics can mix without restriction. We give a sound and complete sequent calculus that requires novel proof transformations for cut elimination. Compared to linear logic, classical fragments of proofs are better isolated from non-classical fragments. One of our goals is to allow non-classical restrictions to coexist with computational interpretations of classical logic such as found in the λμ calculus. In fact, we show that the transition between different modes of proof, classical, intuitionistic and affine, can be interpreted by delimited control operators. We also discuss how to extend the definition of focused proofs to this logic.","PeriodicalId":206395,"journal":{"name":"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unified Semantics and Proof System for Classical, Intuitionistic and Affine Logics\",\"authors\":\"Chuck C. Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2933575.2933581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper modifies our previous work in combining classical logic with intuitionistic logic [16], [17] to also include affine linear logic, resulting in a system we call Affine Control Logic. A propositional system with six binary connectives is defined and given a phase space interpretation. Choosing classical, intuitionistic or affine reasoning is entirely dependent on the subformula property. Moreover, the connectives of these logics can mix without restriction. We give a sound and complete sequent calculus that requires novel proof transformations for cut elimination. Compared to linear logic, classical fragments of proofs are better isolated from non-classical fragments. One of our goals is to allow non-classical restrictions to coexist with computational interpretations of classical logic such as found in the λμ calculus. In fact, we show that the transition between different modes of proof, classical, intuitionistic and affine, can be interpreted by delimited control operators. We also discuss how to extend the definition of focused proofs to this logic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2933575.2933581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2933575.2933581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unified Semantics and Proof System for Classical, Intuitionistic and Affine Logics
This paper modifies our previous work in combining classical logic with intuitionistic logic [16], [17] to also include affine linear logic, resulting in a system we call Affine Control Logic. A propositional system with six binary connectives is defined and given a phase space interpretation. Choosing classical, intuitionistic or affine reasoning is entirely dependent on the subformula property. Moreover, the connectives of these logics can mix without restriction. We give a sound and complete sequent calculus that requires novel proof transformations for cut elimination. Compared to linear logic, classical fragments of proofs are better isolated from non-classical fragments. One of our goals is to allow non-classical restrictions to coexist with computational interpretations of classical logic such as found in the λμ calculus. In fact, we show that the transition between different modes of proof, classical, intuitionistic and affine, can be interpreted by delimited control operators. We also discuss how to extend the definition of focused proofs to this logic.