智力测试和文化多样性:对替代工具、政策和程序的需求

D. Ford
{"title":"智力测试和文化多样性:对替代工具、政策和程序的需求","authors":"D. Ford","doi":"10.4324/9781003232988-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is great deal of concern and debate about the low performance of racially and linguistically diverse students— those of Black, Hispanic, and Native American descent—on standardized tests. Nowhere are the debates and controversies surrounding intelligence testing more prevalent than in gifted education and special education. These two educational fields rely extensively on tests to make educational and placement decisions. In gifted education, low test scores often prevent diverse students from being identified as gifted and receiving services; in special education, low test scores often result in the identification of these students as learning disabled, developmentally delayed, and so forth.","PeriodicalId":336702,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Assessments","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intelligence Testing and Cultural Diversity: The Need for Alternative Instruments, Policies, and Procedures\",\"authors\":\"D. Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003232988-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is great deal of concern and debate about the low performance of racially and linguistically diverse students— those of Black, Hispanic, and Native American descent—on standardized tests. Nowhere are the debates and controversies surrounding intelligence testing more prevalent than in gifted education and special education. These two educational fields rely extensively on tests to make educational and placement decisions. In gifted education, low test scores often prevent diverse students from being identified as gifted and receiving services; in special education, low test scores often result in the identification of these students as learning disabled, developmentally delayed, and so forth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative Assessments\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative Assessments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003232988-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003232988-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

种族和语言多样化的学生——黑人、西班牙裔和印第安人后裔——在标准化考试中的表现不佳,这引起了很多关注和争论。在资优教育和特殊教育中,围绕智力测试的辩论和争议最为普遍。这两个教育领域广泛依赖考试来做出教育和分班决定。在资优教育中,低考试分数往往会阻止不同的学生被认定为资优并接受服务;在特殊教育中,考试成绩低往往会导致这些学生被认定为学习障碍、发育迟缓等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intelligence Testing and Cultural Diversity: The Need for Alternative Instruments, Policies, and Procedures
There is great deal of concern and debate about the low performance of racially and linguistically diverse students— those of Black, Hispanic, and Native American descent—on standardized tests. Nowhere are the debates and controversies surrounding intelligence testing more prevalent than in gifted education and special education. These two educational fields rely extensively on tests to make educational and placement decisions. In gifted education, low test scores often prevent diverse students from being identified as gifted and receiving services; in special education, low test scores often result in the identification of these students as learning disabled, developmentally delayed, and so forth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identifying Low-Income and Minority Students for Gifted Programs: Academic and Affective Impact of Performance-Based Assessment An Overview of Alternative Assessment Measures for Gifted Learners and the Issues That Surround Their Use The Rainbow Project: Using a Psychological Theory of Giftedness to Improve the Identification of Gifted Children Epilogue: What Do We Know About Identifying and Assessing the Learning of Gifted Students? Portfolio Assessment of Gifted Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1