欧盟气候政策的成本效益如何?来自葡萄牙使用综合模型的证据

Sara Proença, P. Fortes
{"title":"欧盟气候政策的成本效益如何?来自葡萄牙使用综合模型的证据","authors":"Sara Proença, P. Fortes","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2017.7981890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union (EU) has long been at the forefront of international efforts to tackle climate change. The challenge becomes designing the most cost-eDective policy mix, capable of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the lowest cost to the economy. In this paper, an integrated CGE modelling approach is applied to explore the cost-effectiveness of EU climate policy, taking Portugal as a case study. Results indicate that the current EU climate policy configuration makes GHG reduction more costly than needed. The mitigation targets for 2030 could be achieved at least cost through the implementation of a comprehensive cap-and-trade system instead of the actual emission market segmentation. Moreover, the economic argument on counterproductive overlapping regulation is not corroborated by our results. This finding shows the importance of considering the specificities of each Member State when designing policy mixes. Results also highlight the importance of considering market distortions when assessing policy performance.","PeriodicalId":416082,"journal":{"name":"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How cost effective is EU climate policy? Evidence from Portugal using integrated modelling\",\"authors\":\"Sara Proença, P. Fortes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2017.7981890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Union (EU) has long been at the forefront of international efforts to tackle climate change. The challenge becomes designing the most cost-eDective policy mix, capable of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the lowest cost to the economy. In this paper, an integrated CGE modelling approach is applied to explore the cost-effectiveness of EU climate policy, taking Portugal as a case study. Results indicate that the current EU climate policy configuration makes GHG reduction more costly than needed. The mitigation targets for 2030 could be achieved at least cost through the implementation of a comprehensive cap-and-trade system instead of the actual emission market segmentation. Moreover, the economic argument on counterproductive overlapping regulation is not corroborated by our results. This finding shows the importance of considering the specificities of each Member State when designing policy mixes. Results also highlight the importance of considering market distortions when assessing policy performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2017.7981890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2017.7981890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,欧盟一直站在应对气候变化的国际努力的最前沿。挑战在于设计出最具成本效益的政策组合,能够以最低的经济成本减少温室气体(GHG)排放。本文以葡萄牙为例,运用综合CGE建模方法探讨欧盟气候政策的成本效益。结果表明,当前欧盟气候政策配置使得温室气体减排的成本超过了所需。通过实施全面的限额与交易制度,而不是实际的排放市场分割,可以以最低的成本实现2030年的减缓目标。此外,关于适得其反的重叠监管的经济学论点并没有得到我们的结果的证实。这一发现表明在设计政策组合时考虑到每个会员国的具体情况的重要性。研究结果还强调了在评估政策绩效时考虑市场扭曲的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How cost effective is EU climate policy? Evidence from Portugal using integrated modelling
The European Union (EU) has long been at the forefront of international efforts to tackle climate change. The challenge becomes designing the most cost-eDective policy mix, capable of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the lowest cost to the economy. In this paper, an integrated CGE modelling approach is applied to explore the cost-effectiveness of EU climate policy, taking Portugal as a case study. Results indicate that the current EU climate policy configuration makes GHG reduction more costly than needed. The mitigation targets for 2030 could be achieved at least cost through the implementation of a comprehensive cap-and-trade system instead of the actual emission market segmentation. Moreover, the economic argument on counterproductive overlapping regulation is not corroborated by our results. This finding shows the importance of considering the specificities of each Member State when designing policy mixes. Results also highlight the importance of considering market distortions when assessing policy performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Market integration VS temporal granularity: How to provide needed flexibility resources? FV-battery community energy systems: Economic, energy independence and network deferral analysis Adequacy of power capacity during winter peaks in Finland An analysis of market mechanism and bidding strategy for power balancing market mixed by conventional and renewable energy Network pricing for smart grids considering customers' diversified contribution to system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1