数学化视角下的中学数学教材分析研究

Soo-Cheol Kim
{"title":"数学化视角下的中学数学教材分析研究","authors":"Soo-Cheol Kim","doi":"10.21742/ajemr.2020.5.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to compare and analyze the differences between the authorized textbooks and the alternative textbooks at middle school in Korea. By analyzing alternative mathematics textbooks from the point of view of mathematizing, the researcher focused on the teaching and learning examples presented in the alternative textbooks to find out if they induced guided reinvention to students or helped to form mathematical knowledge from the real world contexts. According to the analysis of the textbook outline, the alternative textbook tended to induce students’ voluntary activities and then define mathematical terms and explain concepts, while the authorized textbooks were opposite. When analyzing the contents of alternative textbooks from the point of view of ‘mathematizing’, both the ‘number and operations’ area and the ‘probability and statistics’ area induced the learners to reinvent mathematical knowledge and used the real contexts.","PeriodicalId":148219,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research","volume":"49 17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on the Analysis of the Middle School Mathematics Textbooks from the Perspective of Mathematizing\",\"authors\":\"Soo-Cheol Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.21742/ajemr.2020.5.1.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was conducted to compare and analyze the differences between the authorized textbooks and the alternative textbooks at middle school in Korea. By analyzing alternative mathematics textbooks from the point of view of mathematizing, the researcher focused on the teaching and learning examples presented in the alternative textbooks to find out if they induced guided reinvention to students or helped to form mathematical knowledge from the real world contexts. According to the analysis of the textbook outline, the alternative textbook tended to induce students’ voluntary activities and then define mathematical terms and explain concepts, while the authorized textbooks were opposite. When analyzing the contents of alternative textbooks from the point of view of ‘mathematizing’, both the ‘number and operations’ area and the ‘probability and statistics’ area induced the learners to reinvent mathematical knowledge and used the real contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research\",\"volume\":\"49 17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21742/ajemr.2020.5.1.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21742/ajemr.2020.5.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较分析韩国中学语文教科书与替代教科书的差异。本研究从数学化的角度对数学替代教材进行分析,重点关注替代教材中的教与学实例,以了解替代教材是引导学生进行再创造,还是帮助学生从现实环境中形成数学知识。通过对教科书大纲的分析,替代教科书倾向于引导学生的自愿活动,然后定义数学术语和解释概念,而授权教科书则相反。从“数学化”的角度分析替代教材的内容时,“数与运算”和“概率论与统计”都引导学习者重新创造数学知识,运用真实情境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Study on the Analysis of the Middle School Mathematics Textbooks from the Perspective of Mathematizing
This study was conducted to compare and analyze the differences between the authorized textbooks and the alternative textbooks at middle school in Korea. By analyzing alternative mathematics textbooks from the point of view of mathematizing, the researcher focused on the teaching and learning examples presented in the alternative textbooks to find out if they induced guided reinvention to students or helped to form mathematical knowledge from the real world contexts. According to the analysis of the textbook outline, the alternative textbook tended to induce students’ voluntary activities and then define mathematical terms and explain concepts, while the authorized textbooks were opposite. When analyzing the contents of alternative textbooks from the point of view of ‘mathematizing’, both the ‘number and operations’ area and the ‘probability and statistics’ area induced the learners to reinvent mathematical knowledge and used the real contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the Link between Metacognitive Skills and Mathematics Performance: A Correlational Study in Grade X Evaluating the Effectiveness and Opinions of School Children in North Chile on an Alternative Audiovisual or Text Report for Communicating Science Enhancing Curriculum Management through Lesson Study: Insights from the SECI Knowledge Creation Model Empowering Communities through Technical Education: A Case Study of the Technical Teachers’ Training and Research Formation of the Quality of Leadership: The Role of Education and Values
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1