可持续发展报告质量测量模型及其影响因素:应用基于分析网络过程模糊dematel技术

Habibollah Esmaeilzadeh, Hasan Ghodrati, Hossein Jabbari, Meysam Arabzadeh
{"title":"可持续发展报告质量测量模型及其影响因素:应用基于分析网络过程模糊dematel技术","authors":"Habibollah Esmaeilzadeh, Hasan Ghodrati, Hossein Jabbari, Meysam Arabzadeh","doi":"10.30699/ijf.2021.291022.1246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainability reporting is an important tool for decreasing information asymmetry, according to the stakeholders' demands for transparency. On the other hand, increasing transparency allows investors to have more appropriate evaluations of firms' activities and direct their investments to companies with more enthusiasm. In the organizational context, information asymmetry creates conflict between owners and managers. Managers tend to reduce the gap 29 The model for measuring the Quality of Sustainability Reporting... between themselves and stakeholders, particularly shareholders, by producing and delivering reports. Companies use sustainability reports to connect with their society and environment, as well as a way to manage interactions with various stakeholders for societal approval and activity continuation. The primary purpose of this study is to provide a model for measuring the quality of sustainability reporting and the determinants. In terms of methodology, the current study is qualitative, deductive, cross-sectional, applied, and exploratory. The criteria were identified and extracted, then evaluated and prioritized using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making approaches including Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Analytic Network Process-based. The FAHP test revealed that of the six indicators, the GRI's reporting guidelines for sustainability Checklist were placed highest. Internal Controls Reporting, Sustainability Innovation Performance, and Earnings Quality rated first to third, respectively, among the 25 criteria affecting the quality of sustainability reporting, according to the FDANP.","PeriodicalId":273008,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Finance","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The model for measuring the Quality of Sustainability Reporting and Determinants: Application Analytic Network Process Fuzzy DEMATEL-Based Technique\",\"authors\":\"Habibollah Esmaeilzadeh, Hasan Ghodrati, Hossein Jabbari, Meysam Arabzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.30699/ijf.2021.291022.1246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sustainability reporting is an important tool for decreasing information asymmetry, according to the stakeholders' demands for transparency. On the other hand, increasing transparency allows investors to have more appropriate evaluations of firms' activities and direct their investments to companies with more enthusiasm. In the organizational context, information asymmetry creates conflict between owners and managers. Managers tend to reduce the gap 29 The model for measuring the Quality of Sustainability Reporting... between themselves and stakeholders, particularly shareholders, by producing and delivering reports. Companies use sustainability reports to connect with their society and environment, as well as a way to manage interactions with various stakeholders for societal approval and activity continuation. The primary purpose of this study is to provide a model for measuring the quality of sustainability reporting and the determinants. In terms of methodology, the current study is qualitative, deductive, cross-sectional, applied, and exploratory. The criteria were identified and extracted, then evaluated and prioritized using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making approaches including Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Analytic Network Process-based. The FAHP test revealed that of the six indicators, the GRI's reporting guidelines for sustainability Checklist were placed highest. Internal Controls Reporting, Sustainability Innovation Performance, and Earnings Quality rated first to third, respectively, among the 25 criteria affecting the quality of sustainability reporting, according to the FDANP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Finance\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30699/ijf.2021.291022.1246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/ijf.2021.291022.1246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据利益相关者对透明度的要求,可持续发展报告是减少信息不对称的重要工具。另一方面,增加透明度可以使投资者对企业的活动有更适当的评价,并将他们的投资导向更有热情的公司。在组织环境中,信息不对称造成了所有者和管理者之间的冲突。管理人员倾向于缩小差距29衡量可持续发展报告质量的模型…在他们自己和利益相关者之间,特别是股东之间,通过制作和交付报告。公司使用可持续发展报告来联系他们的社会和环境,以及一种管理与各种利益相关者的互动的方式,以获得社会的认可和活动的延续。本研究的主要目的是提供一个模型来衡量可持续发展报告的质量和决定因素。在方法论方面,目前的研究是定性的、演绎的、横断面的、应用的和探索性的。采用模糊层次分析法和基于模糊决策试验与评价实验室分析网络的多准则决策方法,对评价指标进行识别和提取,并进行评价和排序。FAHP测试显示,在六个指标中,GRI的可持续性清单报告指南排名最高。FDANP表示,在影响可持续发展报告质量的25项标准中,内部控制报告、可持续创新绩效和盈余质量分别排名第一至第三。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The model for measuring the Quality of Sustainability Reporting and Determinants: Application Analytic Network Process Fuzzy DEMATEL-Based Technique
Sustainability reporting is an important tool for decreasing information asymmetry, according to the stakeholders' demands for transparency. On the other hand, increasing transparency allows investors to have more appropriate evaluations of firms' activities and direct their investments to companies with more enthusiasm. In the organizational context, information asymmetry creates conflict between owners and managers. Managers tend to reduce the gap 29 The model for measuring the Quality of Sustainability Reporting... between themselves and stakeholders, particularly shareholders, by producing and delivering reports. Companies use sustainability reports to connect with their society and environment, as well as a way to manage interactions with various stakeholders for societal approval and activity continuation. The primary purpose of this study is to provide a model for measuring the quality of sustainability reporting and the determinants. In terms of methodology, the current study is qualitative, deductive, cross-sectional, applied, and exploratory. The criteria were identified and extracted, then evaluated and prioritized using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making approaches including Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Analytic Network Process-based. The FAHP test revealed that of the six indicators, the GRI's reporting guidelines for sustainability Checklist were placed highest. Internal Controls Reporting, Sustainability Innovation Performance, and Earnings Quality rated first to third, respectively, among the 25 criteria affecting the quality of sustainability reporting, according to the FDANP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing the effectiveness of professional audit judgment based on the mindfulness of auditors Investigating the Effect of Environmental Uncertainty on the Relationship between Herd Behavior and Negative Price Shock in TSE A Genetic algorithm for Objective formulation effect on the shortfall of retirees in developing countries: a case study in Iran Management Ability Effects on Information Environment Quality A Comparative Approach to Financial Clustering Models: (A Study of the Companies Listed on Tehran Stock Exchange)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1