儿童物理治疗师对神经系统损伤的疼痛评估和治疗横断面调查

Duaa Kashif, Durr e Samin Tariq
{"title":"儿童物理治疗师对神经系统损伤的疼痛评估和治疗横断面调查","authors":"Duaa Kashif, Durr e Samin Tariq","doi":"10.55735/thjprs.v2i1.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Physical therapists indicated the use of standardized pain assessment instruments like subjective measures, self-reported scales, behavioral and physiological measures to assess pain in children with neurological impairments. Indicators such as diminished attention, retreat, and changes in sleeping and feeding patterns were also reported along with facial expression, sobbing, and vocalizations. Therapists' perspectives on behavioral pain expressions may be significantly different from the perspectives of the children's parents or caregivers. Objective: To determine the methods of pain assessment and management for children with neurologic impairments used by pediatric physical therapists. Methods: A cross-sectional survey in which the data was collected from different public hospitals in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Convenient sampling was applied to recruit physiotherapists for this study and data was gathered through a structured questionnaire after taking their written informed consent. Results: Frequently used behaviors included facial expression, vocalizations, and irritability. Cues that were rarely used included changes in sleeping, withdrawal, eating behaviors, and decreased attention. Physiotherapists prefer to use pain interventions that were supported by research like praise and distraction as well as distress-producing potentially harmful measures such as reassurance and procedural talk. About 84% percent of the respondents used subjective measures to assess pain, 60% used self-report scales, and 32% used behavioral and physiological measures. The results regarding procedural explanation showed that 41.1% of physiotherapists had very often done procedural explanation and 58.9% had often done it. Conclusion: A well-structured practice pattern of pain assessment and treatment of neurologic deficits was observed among pediatric physical therapists. Praise, distraction, and procedural explanation were often used to ease discomfort and pain while doing physiotherapy treatment sessions. Overt signs such as vocalizations, weeping and facial expressions were used to measure pain more often than subtle markers such as lower attention, disengagement, and disturbed sleep and feeding habits.","PeriodicalId":351154,"journal":{"name":"The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Assessment and Management of Neurologic Impairments by Pediatric Physical Therapists; A Cross-Sectional Survey\",\"authors\":\"Duaa Kashif, Durr e Samin Tariq\",\"doi\":\"10.55735/thjprs.v2i1.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Physical therapists indicated the use of standardized pain assessment instruments like subjective measures, self-reported scales, behavioral and physiological measures to assess pain in children with neurological impairments. Indicators such as diminished attention, retreat, and changes in sleeping and feeding patterns were also reported along with facial expression, sobbing, and vocalizations. Therapists' perspectives on behavioral pain expressions may be significantly different from the perspectives of the children's parents or caregivers. Objective: To determine the methods of pain assessment and management for children with neurologic impairments used by pediatric physical therapists. Methods: A cross-sectional survey in which the data was collected from different public hospitals in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Convenient sampling was applied to recruit physiotherapists for this study and data was gathered through a structured questionnaire after taking their written informed consent. Results: Frequently used behaviors included facial expression, vocalizations, and irritability. Cues that were rarely used included changes in sleeping, withdrawal, eating behaviors, and decreased attention. Physiotherapists prefer to use pain interventions that were supported by research like praise and distraction as well as distress-producing potentially harmful measures such as reassurance and procedural talk. About 84% percent of the respondents used subjective measures to assess pain, 60% used self-report scales, and 32% used behavioral and physiological measures. The results regarding procedural explanation showed that 41.1% of physiotherapists had very often done procedural explanation and 58.9% had often done it. Conclusion: A well-structured practice pattern of pain assessment and treatment of neurologic deficits was observed among pediatric physical therapists. Praise, distraction, and procedural explanation were often used to ease discomfort and pain while doing physiotherapy treatment sessions. Overt signs such as vocalizations, weeping and facial expressions were used to measure pain more often than subtle markers such as lower attention, disengagement, and disturbed sleep and feeding habits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55735/thjprs.v2i1.49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55735/thjprs.v2i1.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:物理治疗师建议使用标准化的疼痛评估工具,如主观测量、自我报告量表、行为和生理测量来评估神经损伤儿童的疼痛。诸如注意力减少、退缩、睡眠和进食模式的变化等指标也与面部表情、抽泣和发声一起被报告。治疗师对行为疼痛表达的观点可能与儿童父母或照顾者的观点有显著不同。目的:探讨小儿物理治疗师对神经功能障碍患儿的疼痛评估和处理方法。方法:采用横断面调查法,收集巴基斯坦费萨拉巴德不同公立医院的数据。本研究采用方便抽样的方法招募物理治疗师,在获得他们的书面知情同意后,通过结构化问卷收集数据。结果:常用的行为包括面部表情、发声和烦躁。很少使用的线索包括睡眠、戒断、饮食行为和注意力下降的变化。物理治疗师更喜欢使用有研究支持的疼痛干预措施,如赞美和分散注意力,以及产生痛苦的潜在有害措施,如安慰和程序性谈话。大约84%的受访者使用主观测量来评估疼痛,60%使用自我报告量表,32%使用行为和生理测量。在程序解释方面,41.1%的物理治疗师经常做程序解释,58.9%的物理治疗师经常做程序解释。结论:在儿童物理治疗师中观察到一种结构良好的疼痛评估和神经功能缺陷治疗的实践模式。在进行物理治疗过程中,经常使用赞美、分散注意力和程序性解释来缓解不适和疼痛。发声、哭泣和面部表情等明显迹象被用来衡量疼痛,而注意力不集中、注意力不集中、睡眠和饮食习惯紊乱等细微迹象则更常被用来衡量疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pain Assessment and Management of Neurologic Impairments by Pediatric Physical Therapists; A Cross-Sectional Survey
Background: Physical therapists indicated the use of standardized pain assessment instruments like subjective measures, self-reported scales, behavioral and physiological measures to assess pain in children with neurological impairments. Indicators such as diminished attention, retreat, and changes in sleeping and feeding patterns were also reported along with facial expression, sobbing, and vocalizations. Therapists' perspectives on behavioral pain expressions may be significantly different from the perspectives of the children's parents or caregivers. Objective: To determine the methods of pain assessment and management for children with neurologic impairments used by pediatric physical therapists. Methods: A cross-sectional survey in which the data was collected from different public hospitals in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Convenient sampling was applied to recruit physiotherapists for this study and data was gathered through a structured questionnaire after taking their written informed consent. Results: Frequently used behaviors included facial expression, vocalizations, and irritability. Cues that were rarely used included changes in sleeping, withdrawal, eating behaviors, and decreased attention. Physiotherapists prefer to use pain interventions that were supported by research like praise and distraction as well as distress-producing potentially harmful measures such as reassurance and procedural talk. About 84% percent of the respondents used subjective measures to assess pain, 60% used self-report scales, and 32% used behavioral and physiological measures. The results regarding procedural explanation showed that 41.1% of physiotherapists had very often done procedural explanation and 58.9% had often done it. Conclusion: A well-structured practice pattern of pain assessment and treatment of neurologic deficits was observed among pediatric physical therapists. Praise, distraction, and procedural explanation were often used to ease discomfort and pain while doing physiotherapy treatment sessions. Overt signs such as vocalizations, weeping and facial expressions were used to measure pain more often than subtle markers such as lower attention, disengagement, and disturbed sleep and feeding habits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Power Ball Exercises in Addition to Routine Physical Therapy on Pain, Grip Strength and Functional Disability in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence among Post-Menopausal Females and Its Associated Factors Decubitus Ulcers in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury in Different Hospitals of Lahore Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Pain among Weight-lifters; A Cross-sectional Survey COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak; Critical Review on the Effectiveness of Social Quarantine as Preventive Public Health Measure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1