发展型国家的替代选择——以澳大利亚新南威尔士州基础设施资产回收为例

C. Nowacki, R. Levitt, Ashby H. B. Monk
{"title":"发展型国家的替代选择——以澳大利亚新南威尔士州基础设施资产回收为例","authors":"C. Nowacki, R. Levitt, Ashby H. B. Monk","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2860264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As public debt rises, governments struggle to fund and finance new infrastructure. The past two decades have seen an increase in privatization of infrastructure assets and public private partnerships. However, alignment of interests between governments and private owners can be challenging. In addition, private investors’ appetite has so far been skewed toward existing assets, while development requires new infrastructure. The literature about the role of the state in development also warns about a failure of the private sector to fulfill governments’ development goals, and the need for a strong State to regulate the market in order to achieve development. A case study of the creation of a new coordination agency in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, offers a new perspective on how governments can lead development. Contrary to Evans’ model of Developmental Bureaucracy, NSW created an agency staffed by employees from the private sector. They also focused on making the best use of private interests to indirectly serve developmental goals, instead silencing private interests by means of a strong bureaucratic culture. The connections between public and private sectors are reminiscent of O’Riain’s Flexible State. However, this case transposes this theory to the strategic fields of private versus public sectors instead of local versus global. Finally, the power given to the coordinating agency is also crucial in this case, but we argue that government is an institution in Scott’s sense, and that normative and cultural-cognitive elements are also crucial in explaining the success of NSW in addition to regulative aspects identified in previous studies. This case study supports a new theory of developmental state which we call the “financier state”, in which Government uses the tools of global financial markets to achieve developmental goals. We describe “asset recycling” as one of such tools, successfully used by NSW to develop infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":376458,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Debt (Topic)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Financier State as an Alternative to The Developmental State: A Case Study of Infrastructure Asset Recycling in New South Wales, Australia\",\"authors\":\"C. Nowacki, R. Levitt, Ashby H. B. Monk\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2860264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As public debt rises, governments struggle to fund and finance new infrastructure. The past two decades have seen an increase in privatization of infrastructure assets and public private partnerships. However, alignment of interests between governments and private owners can be challenging. In addition, private investors’ appetite has so far been skewed toward existing assets, while development requires new infrastructure. The literature about the role of the state in development also warns about a failure of the private sector to fulfill governments’ development goals, and the need for a strong State to regulate the market in order to achieve development. A case study of the creation of a new coordination agency in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, offers a new perspective on how governments can lead development. Contrary to Evans’ model of Developmental Bureaucracy, NSW created an agency staffed by employees from the private sector. They also focused on making the best use of private interests to indirectly serve developmental goals, instead silencing private interests by means of a strong bureaucratic culture. The connections between public and private sectors are reminiscent of O’Riain’s Flexible State. However, this case transposes this theory to the strategic fields of private versus public sectors instead of local versus global. Finally, the power given to the coordinating agency is also crucial in this case, but we argue that government is an institution in Scott’s sense, and that normative and cultural-cognitive elements are also crucial in explaining the success of NSW in addition to regulative aspects identified in previous studies. This case study supports a new theory of developmental state which we call the “financier state”, in which Government uses the tools of global financial markets to achieve developmental goals. We describe “asset recycling” as one of such tools, successfully used by NSW to develop infrastructure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Debt (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Debt (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2860264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Debt (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2860264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着公共债务的增加,政府难以为新的基础设施提供资金和融资。过去二十年,基础设施资产私有化和公私伙伴关系有所增加。然而,政府和私人业主之间的利益协调可能具有挑战性。此外,私人投资者的兴趣迄今一直倾向于现有资产,而开发需要新的基础设施。关于国家在发展中的作用的文献也警告了私营部门在实现政府发展目标方面的失败,以及为了实现发展,需要一个强大的国家来规范市场。在澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)建立一个新的协调机构的案例研究为政府如何领导发展提供了一个新的视角。与埃文斯的发展型官僚主义模式相反,新南威尔士州创建了一个由私营部门雇员组成的机构。他们还注重充分利用私人利益间接服务于发展目标,而不是通过强大的官僚文化压制私人利益。公共部门和私营部门之间的联系让人想起O 'Riain的灵活状态。然而,这个案例将这一理论转移到私营部门与公共部门的战略领域,而不是地方与全球。最后,在这种情况下,给予协调机构的权力也至关重要,但我们认为,在斯科特的意义上,政府是一个机构,除了先前研究中确定的监管方面外,规范和文化认知因素在解释新南威尔士州的成功方面也至关重要。本案例研究支持了一种新的发展性国家理论,我们称之为“金融家国家”,即政府利用全球金融市场的工具来实现发展目标。我们将“资产回收”描述为这样一种工具,新南威尔士州成功地使用了这种工具来发展基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Financier State as an Alternative to The Developmental State: A Case Study of Infrastructure Asset Recycling in New South Wales, Australia
As public debt rises, governments struggle to fund and finance new infrastructure. The past two decades have seen an increase in privatization of infrastructure assets and public private partnerships. However, alignment of interests between governments and private owners can be challenging. In addition, private investors’ appetite has so far been skewed toward existing assets, while development requires new infrastructure. The literature about the role of the state in development also warns about a failure of the private sector to fulfill governments’ development goals, and the need for a strong State to regulate the market in order to achieve development. A case study of the creation of a new coordination agency in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, offers a new perspective on how governments can lead development. Contrary to Evans’ model of Developmental Bureaucracy, NSW created an agency staffed by employees from the private sector. They also focused on making the best use of private interests to indirectly serve developmental goals, instead silencing private interests by means of a strong bureaucratic culture. The connections between public and private sectors are reminiscent of O’Riain’s Flexible State. However, this case transposes this theory to the strategic fields of private versus public sectors instead of local versus global. Finally, the power given to the coordinating agency is also crucial in this case, but we argue that government is an institution in Scott’s sense, and that normative and cultural-cognitive elements are also crucial in explaining the success of NSW in addition to regulative aspects identified in previous studies. This case study supports a new theory of developmental state which we call the “financier state”, in which Government uses the tools of global financial markets to achieve developmental goals. We describe “asset recycling” as one of such tools, successfully used by NSW to develop infrastructure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Drives Variation in the U.S. Debt/Output Ratio? The Dogs that Didn't Bark Value Recovery Instruments: A Contrarian Proposition 재원조달 방법을 고려한 재정지출 효과 분석 : 미국의 사례를 중심으로 (Estimating Fiscal Multiplier: Do Financing Methods Matter?) Sovereign debt dynamics with serial defaults Policy Brief: Design Choices in Sovereign Asset Management Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1