活化蛋白C抵抗试验研究因子V Leiden突变与复发性妊娠丢失的关系(病例对照研究)

Raghda Ayman Abouelela, A. Hussien, Abdel M. Mageed, Manal Fawzy Gabr
{"title":"活化蛋白C抵抗试验研究因子V Leiden突变与复发性妊娠丢失的关系(病例对照研究)","authors":"Raghda Ayman Abouelela, A. Hussien, Abdel M. Mageed, Manal Fawzy Gabr","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2020.19975.1057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss is considered as a major devastating obstetric and gynecological health problem. Many clinicians define RPL as three or more consecutive pregnancies ending spontaneously before the 20th week of gestation. Aim of the Work: to investigate prevalence of FVL mutation in women with RPL using, a less time and money consuming test, APCR test. Patients and Methods: We compared the prevalence of FVL among 83 patients with history of 3 or more first tri-mesteric pregnancy losses (the case group) with an equal number of women with no history of RPL (the control group), recruited from the RPL outpatient clinic at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, during the period between April 2018 till June 2019. Results: Abnormal APCR test values were found in a total of 22 women in our study, 7 women in the control group (8.4%) and 15 in the case group (18.07%) with no statistically significant differences. However, in further assessment of case group, two patients in the case group with abnormal APC value, suffered from DVT episodes, representing 13.3% of 15 patient with abnormal APCR. The P value was statistically significant, which mean that the present of APCR might increase the risk for DVT Conclusion: Isolated FVL is unlikely to be an important cause for RPL as no statistically significant difference is found between the case and control groups.","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association of Factor V Leiden Mutation With Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Using Activated Protein C Resistance Test (Case-Control Study)\",\"authors\":\"Raghda Ayman Abouelela, A. Hussien, Abdel M. Mageed, Manal Fawzy Gabr\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ebwhj.2020.19975.1057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss is considered as a major devastating obstetric and gynecological health problem. Many clinicians define RPL as three or more consecutive pregnancies ending spontaneously before the 20th week of gestation. Aim of the Work: to investigate prevalence of FVL mutation in women with RPL using, a less time and money consuming test, APCR test. Patients and Methods: We compared the prevalence of FVL among 83 patients with history of 3 or more first tri-mesteric pregnancy losses (the case group) with an equal number of women with no history of RPL (the control group), recruited from the RPL outpatient clinic at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, during the period between April 2018 till June 2019. Results: Abnormal APCR test values were found in a total of 22 women in our study, 7 women in the control group (8.4%) and 15 in the case group (18.07%) with no statistically significant differences. However, in further assessment of case group, two patients in the case group with abnormal APC value, suffered from DVT episodes, representing 13.3% of 15 patient with abnormal APCR. The P value was statistically significant, which mean that the present of APCR might increase the risk for DVT Conclusion: Isolated FVL is unlikely to be an important cause for RPL as no statistically significant difference is found between the case and control groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2020.19975.1057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2020.19975.1057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:反复妊娠丢失被认为是一个主要的破坏性的产科和妇科健康问题。许多临床医生将RPL定义为三次或更多连续妊娠在妊娠20周前自然终止。研究目的:利用一种省时省钱的检测方法——APCR检测,调查RPL妇女FVL突变的流行情况。患者和方法:我们比较了2018年4月至2019年6月期间,从艾因沙姆斯大学妇产医院妇产科RPL门诊招募的83名有3次或3次以上首次三期妊娠失败史的患者(病例组)和同等数量无RPL史的女性(对照组)的FVL患病率。结果:本研究共发现APCR检测值异常22例,对照组7例(8.4%),病例组15例(18.07%),差异无统计学意义。然而,在进一步的病例组评估中,APC值异常的病例组中有2例患者发生DVT发作,占15例APCR异常患者的13.3%。结论:孤立性FVL不太可能是RPL发生的重要原因,病例组与对照组之间无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Association of Factor V Leiden Mutation With Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Using Activated Protein C Resistance Test (Case-Control Study)
Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss is considered as a major devastating obstetric and gynecological health problem. Many clinicians define RPL as three or more consecutive pregnancies ending spontaneously before the 20th week of gestation. Aim of the Work: to investigate prevalence of FVL mutation in women with RPL using, a less time and money consuming test, APCR test. Patients and Methods: We compared the prevalence of FVL among 83 patients with history of 3 or more first tri-mesteric pregnancy losses (the case group) with an equal number of women with no history of RPL (the control group), recruited from the RPL outpatient clinic at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, during the period between April 2018 till June 2019. Results: Abnormal APCR test values were found in a total of 22 women in our study, 7 women in the control group (8.4%) and 15 in the case group (18.07%) with no statistically significant differences. However, in further assessment of case group, two patients in the case group with abnormal APC value, suffered from DVT episodes, representing 13.3% of 15 patient with abnormal APCR. The P value was statistically significant, which mean that the present of APCR might increase the risk for DVT Conclusion: Isolated FVL is unlikely to be an important cause for RPL as no statistically significant difference is found between the case and control groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hysteroscopy as a diagnostic tool in women with recurrent pregnancy loss, a prospective randomized controlled study Serum Soluble Endoglin Versus Serum Placental Growth Factor for Early Prediction of Preeclampsia Cervical cerclage for Pregnant Women at High-risk of Recurrent Preterm Birth can act beyond its Mechanical Action New ultrasound signs for prediction of early placental Insufficiency Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative Intravenous Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss During and After Elective Lower‐Segment Cesarean Delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1