受众反应系统可能有助于建立诊断和管理哮喘的信心和能力

W. Ricketts, P. Pfeffer, R. Ashworth, A. Hakim
{"title":"受众反应系统可能有助于建立诊断和管理哮喘的信心和能力","authors":"W. Ricketts, P. Pfeffer, R. Ashworth, A. Hakim","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa5346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Correct interpretation of lung function tests is essential for diagnosis and management of common respiratory diseases. Medical students enrolled at Barts and the London, QMUL, receive a series of teaching sessions describing management of respiratory diseases prior to attendance on respiratory wards. However, a proportion of students struggle to apply managment algorithms to aid clinical decision making in real-life patients. Previous studies suggest that audience response systems (ARS) may aid decision making. We hypothesized that the use of an ARS may improve confidence and competency amongst medical students when undertaking clinical decisions or interpreting lung function tests. Methods: Chest physicians and medical science lecturers collectively designed a new teaching session using an ARS, Mentimeter, which required students to manage a patient that was referred to the respiratory clinic. In a step-wise manner, students were presented with the patient’s medical and physical history, followed by lung function results. At each stage of the presentation, students were questioned to assess their clinical decision making/interpretation of lung function results. Students’ view of the interactive teaching session using ARS were surveyed using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Following the ARS teaching session, 70 and 97% of students strongly agreed/agreed that they felt more confident in analysing spirometry data and developed a better understanding of clinical-decision making in asthma management, respectively. Discussion: Utilising an ARS can help build medical students’ confidence and clinical decision making, and insights for future clinical study.","PeriodicalId":228043,"journal":{"name":"Medical education, web and internet","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audience response systems may help build confidence and competence in diagnosing and managing asthma\",\"authors\":\"W. Ricketts, P. Pfeffer, R. Ashworth, A. Hakim\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa5346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Correct interpretation of lung function tests is essential for diagnosis and management of common respiratory diseases. Medical students enrolled at Barts and the London, QMUL, receive a series of teaching sessions describing management of respiratory diseases prior to attendance on respiratory wards. However, a proportion of students struggle to apply managment algorithms to aid clinical decision making in real-life patients. Previous studies suggest that audience response systems (ARS) may aid decision making. We hypothesized that the use of an ARS may improve confidence and competency amongst medical students when undertaking clinical decisions or interpreting lung function tests. Methods: Chest physicians and medical science lecturers collectively designed a new teaching session using an ARS, Mentimeter, which required students to manage a patient that was referred to the respiratory clinic. In a step-wise manner, students were presented with the patient’s medical and physical history, followed by lung function results. At each stage of the presentation, students were questioned to assess their clinical decision making/interpretation of lung function results. Students’ view of the interactive teaching session using ARS were surveyed using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Following the ARS teaching session, 70 and 97% of students strongly agreed/agreed that they felt more confident in analysing spirometry data and developed a better understanding of clinical-decision making in asthma management, respectively. Discussion: Utilising an ARS can help build medical students’ confidence and clinical decision making, and insights for future clinical study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical education, web and internet\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical education, web and internet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa5346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical education, web and internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa5346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:正确解读肺功能检查对常见呼吸系统疾病的诊断和治疗至关重要。在巴茨和伦敦QMUL注册的医科学生在进入呼吸病房之前,要接受一系列关于呼吸系统疾病管理的教学课程。然而,有一部分学生很难应用管理算法来帮助现实生活中的患者做出临床决策。先前的研究表明,观众反应系统(ARS)可能有助于决策。我们假设使用ARS可以提高医学生在进行临床决策或解释肺功能检查时的信心和能力。方法:胸科医生和医学讲师共同设计了一个新的教学课程,使用ARS, Mentimeter,要求学生管理一个转介到呼吸诊所的病人。以循序渐进的方式,向学生介绍了患者的医疗和身体病史,然后是肺功能结果。在报告的每个阶段,学生都被询问以评估他们对肺功能结果的临床决策/解释。使用5分李克特量表调查学生对使用ARS的互动教学会话的看法。结果:在ARS教学课程之后,70%和97%的学生强烈同意/同意他们对分析肺活量测定数据更有信心,并对哮喘管理的临床决策有了更好的理解。讨论:利用ARS可以帮助医学生建立信心和临床决策,并为未来的临床研究提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Audience response systems may help build confidence and competence in diagnosing and managing asthma
Background: Correct interpretation of lung function tests is essential for diagnosis and management of common respiratory diseases. Medical students enrolled at Barts and the London, QMUL, receive a series of teaching sessions describing management of respiratory diseases prior to attendance on respiratory wards. However, a proportion of students struggle to apply managment algorithms to aid clinical decision making in real-life patients. Previous studies suggest that audience response systems (ARS) may aid decision making. We hypothesized that the use of an ARS may improve confidence and competency amongst medical students when undertaking clinical decisions or interpreting lung function tests. Methods: Chest physicians and medical science lecturers collectively designed a new teaching session using an ARS, Mentimeter, which required students to manage a patient that was referred to the respiratory clinic. In a step-wise manner, students were presented with the patient’s medical and physical history, followed by lung function results. At each stage of the presentation, students were questioned to assess their clinical decision making/interpretation of lung function results. Students’ view of the interactive teaching session using ARS were surveyed using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Following the ARS teaching session, 70 and 97% of students strongly agreed/agreed that they felt more confident in analysing spirometry data and developed a better understanding of clinical-decision making in asthma management, respectively. Discussion: Utilising an ARS can help build medical students’ confidence and clinical decision making, and insights for future clinical study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The value of a pleural fellowship post Comparison of physicians’ and medical students’ knowledge in the treatment and prevention of COPD according to the final results of the ASCO-II study COPD.Pal: Using a person-based approach to develop a self-management app for people with COPD Children’s interstital lung diseases (chILD) – an area of unmet educational need? Impact of COVID-19 on Tunisian pulmonology trainees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1