风险厌恶型高管、多重共同风险与指数化高管股票期权的效率与激励

Shane A. Johnson, Yisong S. Tian
{"title":"风险厌恶型高管、多重共同风险与指数化高管股票期权的效率与激励","authors":"Shane A. Johnson, Yisong S. Tian","doi":"10.1142/S0219868104000038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We extend research on executive stock options in two ways. First, we generalize Johnson and Tian's (Journal of Financial Economics, 57 (2000b)) single indexed executive stock option to incorporate multiple common risks. Second, we use an expected utility framework to analyze the efficiency and incentive effects of traditional and indexed option grants for risk-averse executives. If firms grant equal numbers of each option type and adjust their moneyness to provide equal utility to executives, single and multi-indexed option grants are less expensive than traditional options while providing stronger incentives to increase stock price. If firms adjust the number of options granted instead of their moneyness to produce equal utility, indexed option grants are more expensive than traditional grants. For firms facing multiple common risks, multi-indexed options are less expensive and provide stronger incentives to increase stock price than single indexed options.","PeriodicalId":128457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Derivatives Accounting","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RISK-AVERSE EXECUTIVES, MULTIPLE COMMON RISKS, AND THE EFFICIENCY AND INCENTIVES OF INDEXED EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS\",\"authors\":\"Shane A. Johnson, Yisong S. Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S0219868104000038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We extend research on executive stock options in two ways. First, we generalize Johnson and Tian's (Journal of Financial Economics, 57 (2000b)) single indexed executive stock option to incorporate multiple common risks. Second, we use an expected utility framework to analyze the efficiency and incentive effects of traditional and indexed option grants for risk-averse executives. If firms grant equal numbers of each option type and adjust their moneyness to provide equal utility to executives, single and multi-indexed option grants are less expensive than traditional options while providing stronger incentives to increase stock price. If firms adjust the number of options granted instead of their moneyness to produce equal utility, indexed option grants are more expensive than traditional grants. For firms facing multiple common risks, multi-indexed options are less expensive and provide stronger incentives to increase stock price than single indexed options.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Derivatives Accounting\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Derivatives Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219868104000038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Derivatives Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219868104000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

本文从两个方面展开对高管股票期权的研究。首先,我们对Johnson和Tian (Journal of Financial Economics, 57 (2000b))的单指数高管股票期权进行了推广,以纳入多个共同风险。其次,我们使用预期效用框架来分析传统和指数期权授予对风险厌恶型高管的效率和激励效应。如果企业授予相同数量的每种期权,并调整其货币量以为高管提供相同的效用,那么单指数和多指数期权授予比传统期权更便宜,同时提供更强的股票价格上涨激励。如果公司调整授予期权的数量,而不是调整他们的资金,以产生相等的效用,指数期权授予比传统的授予更昂贵。对于面临多重共同风险的企业来说,多指数期权比单指数期权成本更低,对股价的激励作用更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RISK-AVERSE EXECUTIVES, MULTIPLE COMMON RISKS, AND THE EFFICIENCY AND INCENTIVES OF INDEXED EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS
We extend research on executive stock options in two ways. First, we generalize Johnson and Tian's (Journal of Financial Economics, 57 (2000b)) single indexed executive stock option to incorporate multiple common risks. Second, we use an expected utility framework to analyze the efficiency and incentive effects of traditional and indexed option grants for risk-averse executives. If firms grant equal numbers of each option type and adjust their moneyness to provide equal utility to executives, single and multi-indexed option grants are less expensive than traditional options while providing stronger incentives to increase stock price. If firms adjust the number of options granted instead of their moneyness to produce equal utility, indexed option grants are more expensive than traditional grants. For firms facing multiple common risks, multi-indexed options are less expensive and provide stronger incentives to increase stock price than single indexed options.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HEDGE ACCOUNTING AND DERIVATIVES STUDY FOR CORPORATES DISCLOSURE, HEDGE ACCOUNTING, AND RESTATEMENT RISK Executive Stock Option Exercises and the Predictive Ability of Transaction Value HOW TAXES AFFECT MARKET PRICE: THE "LONGS AND SHORTS" OF DISCOUNTING AND INFORMATION ACCOUNTING FOR EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTIONS AND MANDATORY EXPENSING: AN ECONOMICS PERSPECTIVE EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS: A FIRM VALUE APPROACH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1