具有可确定安全属性的可自由支配访问控制的分层设计

Jon A. Solworth, R. Sloan
{"title":"具有可确定安全属性的可自由支配访问控制的分层设计","authors":"Jon A. Solworth, R. Sloan","doi":"10.1109/SECPRI.2004.1301315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An access control design can be viewed as a three layered entity: the general access control model; the parameterization of the access control model; and the initial users and objects of the system before it goes live. The design of this three-tiered mechanism can be evaluated according to two broad measures, the expressiveness versus the complexity of the system. In particular, the question arises: What security properties can be expressed and verified? We present a general access control model which can be parameterized at the second layer to implement (express) any of the standard Discretionary Access Control (DAC) models. We show that the safety problem is decidable for any access control model implemented using our general access control model. Until now, all general access control models that were known to be sufficiently expressive to implement the full range of DAC models had an undecidable safety problem. Thus, given our model all of the standard DAC models (plus many others) can be implemented in a system in which their safety properties are decidable.","PeriodicalId":447471,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A layered design of discretionary access controls with decidable safety properties\",\"authors\":\"Jon A. Solworth, R. Sloan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SECPRI.2004.1301315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An access control design can be viewed as a three layered entity: the general access control model; the parameterization of the access control model; and the initial users and objects of the system before it goes live. The design of this three-tiered mechanism can be evaluated according to two broad measures, the expressiveness versus the complexity of the system. In particular, the question arises: What security properties can be expressed and verified? We present a general access control model which can be parameterized at the second layer to implement (express) any of the standard Discretionary Access Control (DAC) models. We show that the safety problem is decidable for any access control model implemented using our general access control model. Until now, all general access control models that were known to be sufficiently expressive to implement the full range of DAC models had an undecidable safety problem. Thus, given our model all of the standard DAC models (plus many others) can be implemented in a system in which their safety properties are decidable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECPRI.2004.1301315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECPRI.2004.1301315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

访问控制设计可以看作是一个三层实体:通用访问控制模型;访问控制模型的参数化;以及系统运行前的初始用户和对象。这个三层机制的设计可以根据两个广泛的度量来评估,即系统的表现力和复杂性。特别地,问题出现了:哪些安全属性可以表示和验证?我们提出了一个通用的访问控制模型,该模型可以在第二层参数化,以实现(表达)任何标准的任意访问控制(DAC)模型。我们证明,对于使用我们的通用访问控制模型实现的任何访问控制模型,安全问题都是可确定的。到目前为止,所有已知能够充分表达以实现所有DAC模型的通用访问控制模型都存在无法确定的安全问题。因此,给定我们的模型,所有标准DAC模型(加上许多其他模型)都可以在其安全属性可确定的系统中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A layered design of discretionary access controls with decidable safety properties
An access control design can be viewed as a three layered entity: the general access control model; the parameterization of the access control model; and the initial users and objects of the system before it goes live. The design of this three-tiered mechanism can be evaluated according to two broad measures, the expressiveness versus the complexity of the system. In particular, the question arises: What security properties can be expressed and verified? We present a general access control model which can be parameterized at the second layer to implement (express) any of the standard Discretionary Access Control (DAC) models. We show that the safety problem is decidable for any access control model implemented using our general access control model. Until now, all general access control models that were known to be sufficiently expressive to implement the full range of DAC models had an undecidable safety problem. Thus, given our model all of the standard DAC models (plus many others) can be implemented in a system in which their safety properties are decidable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An empirical analysis of target-resident DoS filters Safety in automated trust negotiation Analysis of an electronic voting system Run-time principals in information-flow type systems Automatic proof of strong secrecy for security protocols
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1