TUMS:使用突变模式进行测试

ACM-SE 35 Pub Date : 1997-04-02 DOI:10.1145/2817460.2817505
Roland H. Untch, M. J. Harrold, A. Offutt
{"title":"TUMS:使用突变模式进行测试","authors":"Roland H. Untch, M. J. Harrold, A. Offutt","doi":"10.1145/2817460.2817505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mutation analysis is a way of quantifying the quality of a test set used in unit testing software. Unfortunately, mutation analysis performed using the conventional interpretive method is very slow. A new non-interpretive method, the MSG method, that has the promise of much higher performance was recently advanced. In this paper we describe TUMS, a prototype MSG-based implementation of a mutation analysis system. We also describe several experiments using this prototype that compare the performance of mutation analysis using the MSG method with mutation analysis using the conventional method. Our experiments strongly suggest that using the new MSG method is significantly faster than using the conventional method, with speed-ups as high as an order-of-magnitude observed.","PeriodicalId":274966,"journal":{"name":"ACM-SE 35","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TUMS: testing using mutant schemata\",\"authors\":\"Roland H. Untch, M. J. Harrold, A. Offutt\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2817460.2817505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mutation analysis is a way of quantifying the quality of a test set used in unit testing software. Unfortunately, mutation analysis performed using the conventional interpretive method is very slow. A new non-interpretive method, the MSG method, that has the promise of much higher performance was recently advanced. In this paper we describe TUMS, a prototype MSG-based implementation of a mutation analysis system. We also describe several experiments using this prototype that compare the performance of mutation analysis using the MSG method with mutation analysis using the conventional method. Our experiments strongly suggest that using the new MSG method is significantly faster than using the conventional method, with speed-ups as high as an order-of-magnitude observed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM-SE 35\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM-SE 35\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2817460.2817505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM-SE 35","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2817460.2817505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

突变分析是单元测试软件中用于量化测试集质量的一种方法。不幸的是,使用传统的解释方法进行突变分析非常缓慢。最近提出了一种新的非解释性方法,即MSG方法,它具有更高的性能。在本文中,我们描述了一个基于msg实现的突变分析系统的原型TUMS。我们还描述了使用该原型的几个实验,比较了使用MSG方法进行突变分析与使用常规方法进行突变分析的性能。我们的实验强烈表明,使用新的味精方法比使用传统方法要快得多,速度高达一个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TUMS: testing using mutant schemata
Mutation analysis is a way of quantifying the quality of a test set used in unit testing software. Unfortunately, mutation analysis performed using the conventional interpretive method is very slow. A new non-interpretive method, the MSG method, that has the promise of much higher performance was recently advanced. In this paper we describe TUMS, a prototype MSG-based implementation of a mutation analysis system. We also describe several experiments using this prototype that compare the performance of mutation analysis using the MSG method with mutation analysis using the conventional method. Our experiments strongly suggest that using the new MSG method is significantly faster than using the conventional method, with speed-ups as high as an order-of-magnitude observed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving the identification of verbs Constructing Delaunay triangulation on the Intel Paragon Software agents and the role of market protocols Interactive Petri net simulation Hybrid evolutionary path planning via visibility-based repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1