拉丁语政治学2

P. Probert
{"title":"拉丁语政治学2","authors":"P. Probert","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198841609.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While Chapter 4 considered the late antique evidence for Latin grammarians’ thought on proclitic words, Chapter 5 considers the much scantier evidence dating from the first three centuries AD, working backwards in time from comments in a glossary preserved on a third-century AD papyrus (P.Sorb. inv. 2069) to comments in Aulus Gellius, Velius Longus, Quintilian, and a fragment of Remmius Palaemon. The chapter argues that these texts repeatedly present us with a picture compatible with what we find in late antique grammatical texts, and sheds new light on the notoriously difficult discussion in Quintilian.","PeriodicalId":269582,"journal":{"name":"Latin Grammarians on the Latin Accent","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Latin Proclitics II\",\"authors\":\"P. Probert\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198841609.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While Chapter 4 considered the late antique evidence for Latin grammarians’ thought on proclitic words, Chapter 5 considers the much scantier evidence dating from the first three centuries AD, working backwards in time from comments in a glossary preserved on a third-century AD papyrus (P.Sorb. inv. 2069) to comments in Aulus Gellius, Velius Longus, Quintilian, and a fragment of Remmius Palaemon. The chapter argues that these texts repeatedly present us with a picture compatible with what we find in late antique grammatical texts, and sheds new light on the notoriously difficult discussion in Quintilian.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin Grammarians on the Latin Accent\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin Grammarians on the Latin Accent\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198841609.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin Grammarians on the Latin Accent","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198841609.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第四章考虑了拉丁语法学家对倾向词思想的晚期古代证据,第五章考虑了公元前三个世纪的更少的证据,从公元三世纪的莎草纸上保存的词汇表中的评论往回追溯。2069年以后),以评论奥勒斯·格里乌斯、维留斯·朗格斯、昆提利安和雷米乌斯·帕拉蒙的片段。本章认为,这些文本反复向我们展示了一幅与我们在晚期古代语法文本中发现的相容的画面,并为昆提连中臭名昭著的困难讨论提供了新的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Latin Proclitics II
While Chapter 4 considered the late antique evidence for Latin grammarians’ thought on proclitic words, Chapter 5 considers the much scantier evidence dating from the first three centuries AD, working backwards in time from comments in a glossary preserved on a third-century AD papyrus (P.Sorb. inv. 2069) to comments in Aulus Gellius, Velius Longus, Quintilian, and a fragment of Remmius Palaemon. The chapter argues that these texts repeatedly present us with a picture compatible with what we find in late antique grammatical texts, and sheds new light on the notoriously difficult discussion in Quintilian.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusions The Latin Circumflex Ancient Greek Theory of Prosody Latin Vowel Length Some History of Scholarship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1