{"title":"论高保证科学工作流程","authors":"M. Vouk, Pierre Mouallem","doi":"10.1109/HASE.2011.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific Workflow Management Systems (S-WFMS), such as Kepler, have proven to be an important tools in scientific problem solving. Interestingly, S-WFMS fault-tolerance and failure recovery is still an open topic. It often involves classic fault-tolerance mechanisms, such as alternative versions and rollback with re-runs, reliance on the fault-tolerance capabilities provided by subcomponents and lower layers such as schedulers, Grid and cloud resources, or the underlying operating systems. When failures occur at the underlying layers, a workflow system sees this as failed steps in the process, but frequently without additional detail. This limits S-WFMS' ability to recover from failures. We describe a light weight end-to-end S-WFMS fault-tolerance framework, developed to handle failure patterns that occur in some real-life scientific workflows. Capabilities and limitations of the framework are discussed and assessed using simulations. The results show that the solution considerably increase workflow reliability and execution time stability.","PeriodicalId":403140,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 13th International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On High-Assurance Scientific Workflows\",\"authors\":\"M. Vouk, Pierre Mouallem\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HASE.2011.58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientific Workflow Management Systems (S-WFMS), such as Kepler, have proven to be an important tools in scientific problem solving. Interestingly, S-WFMS fault-tolerance and failure recovery is still an open topic. It often involves classic fault-tolerance mechanisms, such as alternative versions and rollback with re-runs, reliance on the fault-tolerance capabilities provided by subcomponents and lower layers such as schedulers, Grid and cloud resources, or the underlying operating systems. When failures occur at the underlying layers, a workflow system sees this as failed steps in the process, but frequently without additional detail. This limits S-WFMS' ability to recover from failures. We describe a light weight end-to-end S-WFMS fault-tolerance framework, developed to handle failure patterns that occur in some real-life scientific workflows. Capabilities and limitations of the framework are discussed and assessed using simulations. The results show that the solution considerably increase workflow reliability and execution time stability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 13th International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 13th International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HASE.2011.58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 13th International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HASE.2011.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Scientific Workflow Management Systems (S-WFMS), such as Kepler, have proven to be an important tools in scientific problem solving. Interestingly, S-WFMS fault-tolerance and failure recovery is still an open topic. It often involves classic fault-tolerance mechanisms, such as alternative versions and rollback with re-runs, reliance on the fault-tolerance capabilities provided by subcomponents and lower layers such as schedulers, Grid and cloud resources, or the underlying operating systems. When failures occur at the underlying layers, a workflow system sees this as failed steps in the process, but frequently without additional detail. This limits S-WFMS' ability to recover from failures. We describe a light weight end-to-end S-WFMS fault-tolerance framework, developed to handle failure patterns that occur in some real-life scientific workflows. Capabilities and limitations of the framework are discussed and assessed using simulations. The results show that the solution considerably increase workflow reliability and execution time stability.