具有内生归巢的平台寡头垄断:对自由进入和合并的启示

Takanori Adachi, Susumu Sato, M. Tremblay
{"title":"具有内生归巢的平台寡头垄断:对自由进入和合并的启示","authors":"Takanori Adachi, Susumu Sato, M. Tremblay","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3937682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumer multi-homing is considered to be critical for competition policy regarding digital platforms. To assess the role of consumer multi-homing in competition policy toward platforms, we develop a new framework that embeds consumer multi-homing in two-sided market into the otherwise standard model of Cournot oligopoly and apply it to free entry and mergers. We find that the equilibrium level of platform entry is insufficient given the presence of consumer multi-homing, and a required level of merger-specific cost reduction is larger if the fraction of multi-homing consumers is larger. These results together provide a caution to the popular belief that multi-homing mitigates the need for a strict implementation of competition policy.","PeriodicalId":169574,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platform Oligopoly with Endogenous Homing: Implications for Free Entry and Mergers\",\"authors\":\"Takanori Adachi, Susumu Sato, M. Tremblay\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3937682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consumer multi-homing is considered to be critical for competition policy regarding digital platforms. To assess the role of consumer multi-homing in competition policy toward platforms, we develop a new framework that embeds consumer multi-homing in two-sided market into the otherwise standard model of Cournot oligopoly and apply it to free entry and mergers. We find that the equilibrium level of platform entry is insufficient given the presence of consumer multi-homing, and a required level of merger-specific cost reduction is larger if the fraction of multi-homing consumers is larger. These results together provide a caution to the popular belief that multi-homing mitigates the need for a strict implementation of competition policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3937682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3937682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

消费者多重归巢被认为对数字平台的竞争政策至关重要。为了评估消费者多归巢在平台竞争政策中的作用,我们开发了一个新的框架,将双边市场中的消费者多归巢嵌入到古诺寡头垄断的标准模型中,并将其应用于自由进入和合并。我们发现,考虑到消费者多归巢的存在,平台进入的均衡水平是不够的,如果多归巢的消费者比例越大,并购所需的特定成本降低水平就越大。这些结果共同提醒人们,普遍认为多重归巢减轻了严格执行竞争政策的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Platform Oligopoly with Endogenous Homing: Implications for Free Entry and Mergers
Consumer multi-homing is considered to be critical for competition policy regarding digital platforms. To assess the role of consumer multi-homing in competition policy toward platforms, we develop a new framework that embeds consumer multi-homing in two-sided market into the otherwise standard model of Cournot oligopoly and apply it to free entry and mergers. We find that the equilibrium level of platform entry is insufficient given the presence of consumer multi-homing, and a required level of merger-specific cost reduction is larger if the fraction of multi-homing consumers is larger. These results together provide a caution to the popular belief that multi-homing mitigates the need for a strict implementation of competition policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Platform Oligopoly with Endogenous Homing: Implications for Free Entry and Mergers Biosimilar Entry and the Pricing of Biologic Drugs Few Notes on Inequality in Israel: The Causes Behind Inequality Self-Preferencing in Markets with Vertically-Integrated Gatekeeper Platforms Vertical Contracts and Entry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1