火焰光度法测定血清锂的验证

U. Mannapperuma, C. Peiris, D. Thambavita, P. Galappatthy, C. D. Pathiranage, A. Lionel, R. Jayakody
{"title":"火焰光度法测定血清锂的验证","authors":"U. Mannapperuma, C. Peiris, D. Thambavita, P. Galappatthy, C. D. Pathiranage, A. Lionel, R. Jayakody","doi":"10.4038/CJMS.V54I2.4824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Lithium is a first line drug used to treat bipolar affective disorder requiring frequent monitoring due to  its narrow therapeutic index. Flame photometry is a reliable quick and cost-effective method of serum lithium estimation. Objective We aimed to validate a flame photometry method for serum lithium estimation to compare the results with a different model flame photometer and an ion-selective electrode. Method Sherwood 410 flame photometer was used for the analysis. Serum samples were diluted 1:2 using a lithium blank solution containing sodium and potassium. Aqueous lithium standards were prepared using the same blank. The method was validated for the concentration range 0.2-1.5mmol/l. Linearity, recovery, accuracy, precision and stability were determined by standard lithium serum samples representing the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) 0.2mmol/l, median level of quantification (MLOQ) 0.8mmol/l and the upper limit of quantification (ULOQ) 1.5mmol/l. Five replicates of serum and aqueous lithium samples were used to determine linearity in the range between LLOQ and ULOQ using the coefficient of determination (R2). Five standard serum replicates were used for recovery, accuracy and precision studies. Precision was determined by the coefficient of variation (CV%) on three different days. Results of the flame photometric method were compared with those of a different flame photometric method and an ion-selective electrode method. Results: The R2 for the aqueous samples and the serum samples was >0.995 demonstrating linearity. The matrix effect ranged between 92.5% and 105% for the LLOQ, MLOQ and ULOQ. The accuracy and precision for LLOQ, MLOQ of and ULOQ were below 15%. Similar results were obtained for the QC samples with the different model flame photometer and ion-selective electrode method. Conclusion The flame photometric method used in our laboratory is suitable and reliable for determining serum lithium concentrations for use in therapeutic drug monitoring.","PeriodicalId":253405,"journal":{"name":"Ceylon Journal of Medical Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a flame photometric method for serum lithium estimation\",\"authors\":\"U. Mannapperuma, C. Peiris, D. Thambavita, P. Galappatthy, C. D. Pathiranage, A. Lionel, R. Jayakody\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/CJMS.V54I2.4824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Lithium is a first line drug used to treat bipolar affective disorder requiring frequent monitoring due to  its narrow therapeutic index. Flame photometry is a reliable quick and cost-effective method of serum lithium estimation. Objective We aimed to validate a flame photometry method for serum lithium estimation to compare the results with a different model flame photometer and an ion-selective electrode. Method Sherwood 410 flame photometer was used for the analysis. Serum samples were diluted 1:2 using a lithium blank solution containing sodium and potassium. Aqueous lithium standards were prepared using the same blank. The method was validated for the concentration range 0.2-1.5mmol/l. Linearity, recovery, accuracy, precision and stability were determined by standard lithium serum samples representing the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) 0.2mmol/l, median level of quantification (MLOQ) 0.8mmol/l and the upper limit of quantification (ULOQ) 1.5mmol/l. Five replicates of serum and aqueous lithium samples were used to determine linearity in the range between LLOQ and ULOQ using the coefficient of determination (R2). Five standard serum replicates were used for recovery, accuracy and precision studies. Precision was determined by the coefficient of variation (CV%) on three different days. Results of the flame photometric method were compared with those of a different flame photometric method and an ion-selective electrode method. Results: The R2 for the aqueous samples and the serum samples was >0.995 demonstrating linearity. The matrix effect ranged between 92.5% and 105% for the LLOQ, MLOQ and ULOQ. The accuracy and precision for LLOQ, MLOQ of and ULOQ were below 15%. Similar results were obtained for the QC samples with the different model flame photometer and ion-selective electrode method. Conclusion The flame photometric method used in our laboratory is suitable and reliable for determining serum lithium concentrations for use in therapeutic drug monitoring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceylon Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceylon Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/CJMS.V54I2.4824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceylon Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/CJMS.V54I2.4824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

锂是治疗双相情感障碍的一线药物,由于其治疗指数较窄,需要经常监测。火焰光度法是一种可靠、快速、经济的血清锂测定方法。目的验证火焰光度法测定血清锂的方法,比较不同型号火焰光度仪和离子选择电极的测定结果。方法采用sherwood410火焰光度计进行分析。血清样品用含钠和钾的锂空白溶液1:2稀释。用同样的空白制备锂水标准品。验证方法的浓度范围为0.2 ~ 1.5mmol/l。采用定量下限(LLOQ) 0.2mmol/l、定量中位数(MLOQ) 0.8mmol/l、定量上限(ULOQ) 1.5mmol/l的标准锂血清样品测定线性度、回收率、准确度、精密度和稳定性。采用血清和锂水溶液样品的5个重复,利用决定系数(R2)确定LLOQ与ULOQ之间的线性关系。使用5个标准血清重复进行回收率、准确度和精密度研究。精密度由3天的变异系数(CV%)决定。并将火焰光度法的测定结果与不同的火焰光度法和离子选择电极法进行了比较。结果:水样与血清的相关系数R2均>0.995,线性良好。LLOQ、MLOQ和ULOQ的基质效应在92.5% ~ 105%之间。LLOQ、MLOQ和ULOQ的准确度和精密度均在15%以下。采用不同型号火焰光度计和离子选择电极法对QC样品进行了相似的分析。结论本实验室采用火焰光度法测定血清锂离子浓度,适用于治疗药物监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a flame photometric method for serum lithium estimation
Background Lithium is a first line drug used to treat bipolar affective disorder requiring frequent monitoring due to  its narrow therapeutic index. Flame photometry is a reliable quick and cost-effective method of serum lithium estimation. Objective We aimed to validate a flame photometry method for serum lithium estimation to compare the results with a different model flame photometer and an ion-selective electrode. Method Sherwood 410 flame photometer was used for the analysis. Serum samples were diluted 1:2 using a lithium blank solution containing sodium and potassium. Aqueous lithium standards were prepared using the same blank. The method was validated for the concentration range 0.2-1.5mmol/l. Linearity, recovery, accuracy, precision and stability were determined by standard lithium serum samples representing the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) 0.2mmol/l, median level of quantification (MLOQ) 0.8mmol/l and the upper limit of quantification (ULOQ) 1.5mmol/l. Five replicates of serum and aqueous lithium samples were used to determine linearity in the range between LLOQ and ULOQ using the coefficient of determination (R2). Five standard serum replicates were used for recovery, accuracy and precision studies. Precision was determined by the coefficient of variation (CV%) on three different days. Results of the flame photometric method were compared with those of a different flame photometric method and an ion-selective electrode method. Results: The R2 for the aqueous samples and the serum samples was >0.995 demonstrating linearity. The matrix effect ranged between 92.5% and 105% for the LLOQ, MLOQ and ULOQ. The accuracy and precision for LLOQ, MLOQ of and ULOQ were below 15%. Similar results were obtained for the QC samples with the different model flame photometer and ion-selective electrode method. Conclusion The flame photometric method used in our laboratory is suitable and reliable for determining serum lithium concentrations for use in therapeutic drug monitoring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Colombo Medical Congress 2023 - Research Excellence & Beyond: Translating Research into Practice Data and technology driven learning health systems for low and middle income countries Treatment failure in cutaneous leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka – Is it for real? Misinterpretation of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) staging in patients with diabetes: creatinine estimation method as a source of error Supporting affordable healthcare through innovative research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1