奇迹的神学理解:关注科学与神学的交集

Hee Wan Jeong
{"title":"奇迹的神学理解:关注科学与神学的交集","authors":"Hee Wan Jeong","doi":"10.21731/ctat.2022.86.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional understanding of miracles is being challenged. As science advances and secular thinking proliferates, people become increasingly exclusive of miracles and testimonies about miracles. Recognition and acceptance of miracles depend on differences in mindset and worldview. There is a huge gap between those who lived in the pre-modern mindset and worldview and those who live in the modern mindset and worldview. On the other hand, there are differences in the ways of acknowledging and accepting miracles due to differences in civilization and culture even among people living in modern age. \nMiracle stories are much more in the past than in the present. How should we understand and interpret the miracle story of history from today's perspective? There are many miracle stories related to Jesus in the Bible. It is clear that Jesus was accepted as a miracle-worker by the people of that time. However, the ways in which modern Bible scholars acknowledge, accept, and interpret Jesus' miracles differ depending on the category of the miracle. On the one hand, Jesus' miracles are one of many things that Jesus did in his life. Miracles do not determine Jesus' identity. \nWhat place does miracles occupy in the contemporary theological context of the theory of ‘God’s continuous creation’? The understanding of the relationship between miracles and natural laws differs depending on how the laws of nature are defined. Science changes and evolves. When a new paradigm for understanding nature is formed, the way we understand the relationship between natural laws and miracles will change. Miracles are just one of the many variations of God’s creation. It would make more sense to approach miracles through a new understanding of God’s creation. \nAn understanding of miracles requires an understanding of divine action. Traditional theological accounts of divine action are becoming increasingly less persuasive today. We live in a time when it is increasingly difficult to explain and account for God’s activity. The question of divine action posed by the problem of miracles is perhaps the challenge for the theology of our time. A new theology is called for. \nMiracles can be better understood in the Sitz im Leben of believers than in the field of science. Miracles are not a scientific problem, but a theological problem and a matter of faith.","PeriodicalId":370969,"journal":{"name":"The Society of Theology and Thought","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Theological Understanding of Miracle: Focusing on the Intersection of Science and Theology\",\"authors\":\"Hee Wan Jeong\",\"doi\":\"10.21731/ctat.2022.86.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The traditional understanding of miracles is being challenged. As science advances and secular thinking proliferates, people become increasingly exclusive of miracles and testimonies about miracles. Recognition and acceptance of miracles depend on differences in mindset and worldview. There is a huge gap between those who lived in the pre-modern mindset and worldview and those who live in the modern mindset and worldview. On the other hand, there are differences in the ways of acknowledging and accepting miracles due to differences in civilization and culture even among people living in modern age. \\nMiracle stories are much more in the past than in the present. How should we understand and interpret the miracle story of history from today's perspective? There are many miracle stories related to Jesus in the Bible. It is clear that Jesus was accepted as a miracle-worker by the people of that time. However, the ways in which modern Bible scholars acknowledge, accept, and interpret Jesus' miracles differ depending on the category of the miracle. On the one hand, Jesus' miracles are one of many things that Jesus did in his life. Miracles do not determine Jesus' identity. \\nWhat place does miracles occupy in the contemporary theological context of the theory of ‘God’s continuous creation’? The understanding of the relationship between miracles and natural laws differs depending on how the laws of nature are defined. Science changes and evolves. When a new paradigm for understanding nature is formed, the way we understand the relationship between natural laws and miracles will change. Miracles are just one of the many variations of God’s creation. It would make more sense to approach miracles through a new understanding of God’s creation. \\nAn understanding of miracles requires an understanding of divine action. Traditional theological accounts of divine action are becoming increasingly less persuasive today. We live in a time when it is increasingly difficult to explain and account for God’s activity. The question of divine action posed by the problem of miracles is perhaps the challenge for the theology of our time. A new theology is called for. \\nMiracles can be better understood in the Sitz im Leben of believers than in the field of science. Miracles are not a scientific problem, but a theological problem and a matter of faith.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Society of Theology and Thought\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Society of Theology and Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21731/ctat.2022.86.114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Society of Theology and Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21731/ctat.2022.86.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对奇迹的传统理解正在受到挑战。随着科学的进步和世俗思想的扩散,人们越来越排斥奇迹和关于奇迹的见证。对奇迹的认识和接受取决于心态和世界观的不同。生活在前现代思维和世界观中的人与生活在现代思维和世界观中的人之间存在着巨大的差距。另一方面,即使是生活在现代的人们,由于文明和文化的差异,对奇迹的认知和接受方式也存在差异。奇迹故事更多地发生在过去,而不是现在。我们应该如何用今天的眼光去理解和诠释历史的奇迹故事?圣经中有许多与耶稣有关的神迹故事。很明显,耶稣被当时的人们接受为一个创造奇迹的人。然而,现代圣经学者承认、接受和解释耶稣神迹的方式因神迹的类别而异。一方面,耶稣的神迹是他一生中所做的许多事情之一。神迹不能决定耶稣的身份。奇迹在“上帝持续创造”理论的当代神学语境中占据什么位置?对奇迹和自然法则之间关系的理解取决于如何定义自然法则。科学在变化和发展。当一种理解自然的新范式形成时,我们理解自然规律和奇迹之间关系的方式将会改变。奇迹只是上帝创造的众多变化之一。通过对上帝创造的新理解来接近奇迹会更有意义。对奇迹的理解需要对神圣行为的理解。传统神学对神的行为的描述在今天变得越来越没有说服力。我们生活在一个越来越难以解释和解释神的作为的时代。神迹的问题所提出的神的作为的问题,也许是对我们这个时代的神学的挑战。需要一种新的神学。在信仰者的头脑中,比在科学领域中更能理解奇迹。神迹不是一个科学问题,而是一个神学问题和信仰问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Theological Understanding of Miracle: Focusing on the Intersection of Science and Theology
The traditional understanding of miracles is being challenged. As science advances and secular thinking proliferates, people become increasingly exclusive of miracles and testimonies about miracles. Recognition and acceptance of miracles depend on differences in mindset and worldview. There is a huge gap between those who lived in the pre-modern mindset and worldview and those who live in the modern mindset and worldview. On the other hand, there are differences in the ways of acknowledging and accepting miracles due to differences in civilization and culture even among people living in modern age. Miracle stories are much more in the past than in the present. How should we understand and interpret the miracle story of history from today's perspective? There are many miracle stories related to Jesus in the Bible. It is clear that Jesus was accepted as a miracle-worker by the people of that time. However, the ways in which modern Bible scholars acknowledge, accept, and interpret Jesus' miracles differ depending on the category of the miracle. On the one hand, Jesus' miracles are one of many things that Jesus did in his life. Miracles do not determine Jesus' identity. What place does miracles occupy in the contemporary theological context of the theory of ‘God’s continuous creation’? The understanding of the relationship between miracles and natural laws differs depending on how the laws of nature are defined. Science changes and evolves. When a new paradigm for understanding nature is formed, the way we understand the relationship between natural laws and miracles will change. Miracles are just one of the many variations of God’s creation. It would make more sense to approach miracles through a new understanding of God’s creation. An understanding of miracles requires an understanding of divine action. Traditional theological accounts of divine action are becoming increasingly less persuasive today. We live in a time when it is increasingly difficult to explain and account for God’s activity. The question of divine action posed by the problem of miracles is perhaps the challenge for the theology of our time. A new theology is called for. Miracles can be better understood in the Sitz im Leben of believers than in the field of science. Miracles are not a scientific problem, but a theological problem and a matter of faith.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Concept of Time in East-Asia Robert J. Russell: “The Trinitarian Conception of Eternity and Omnipresence in the Theology of Wolfhart Pannenberg” in Time in Eternity Does the Old Testament Conceptualize a Beginning and an End of Time? An Exploration of Time in the Bible Christian Ethical Reflection on Climate Change and Human Responsibility «Le temps comme “distension de l'esprit”: la conception de saint Augustin et son interpretation par Hans Urs von Balthasar et Paul Ricœur»
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1