不同学生群体之间评估的差异:经验和成熟度是否比学习时间更重要?

Ana Paula Alturas, B. Alturas
{"title":"不同学生群体之间评估的差异:经验和成熟度是否比学习时间更重要?","authors":"Ana Paula Alturas, B. Alturas","doi":"10.1504/IJIOME.2010.033549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we examine the results when the same test is applied in the assessment of two different groups of students (a group of graduate students in a post-graduate programme and a group of non-graduate students in a post-secondary programme) who were taught exactly the same content. It is noted that none of the groups required prerequisites for the acquisition of the content in question, and they had the same relative weight in their courses. The results show that students had very different results, so we can conclude that the assessment should be differentiated in order to differentiate the instruments of assessment, as well as the objects of evaluation.","PeriodicalId":193538,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education","volume":"376 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiation in the assessment between different groups of students: are experience and maturity more important than learning time?\",\"authors\":\"Ana Paula Alturas, B. Alturas\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJIOME.2010.033549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we examine the results when the same test is applied in the assessment of two different groups of students (a group of graduate students in a post-graduate programme and a group of non-graduate students in a post-secondary programme) who were taught exactly the same content. It is noted that none of the groups required prerequisites for the acquisition of the content in question, and they had the same relative weight in their courses. The results show that students had very different results, so we can conclude that the assessment should be differentiated in order to differentiate the instruments of assessment, as well as the objects of evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education\",\"volume\":\"376 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIOME.2010.033549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIOME.2010.033549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了将相同的测试应用于两组不同的学生(一组研究生课程的研究生和一组高等教育课程的非研究生)的评估时的结果,这些学生被教授完全相同的内容。值得注意的是,没有一个小组需要先决条件来获得所讨论的内容,并且他们在课程中具有相同的相对权重。结果表明,学生的结果差异很大,因此我们可以得出结论,为了区分评估工具和评估对象,评估应该进行区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differentiation in the assessment between different groups of students: are experience and maturity more important than learning time?
In this paper, we examine the results when the same test is applied in the assessment of two different groups of students (a group of graduate students in a post-graduate programme and a group of non-graduate students in a post-secondary programme) who were taught exactly the same content. It is noted that none of the groups required prerequisites for the acquisition of the content in question, and they had the same relative weight in their courses. The results show that students had very different results, so we can conclude that the assessment should be differentiated in order to differentiate the instruments of assessment, as well as the objects of evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lean production teaching methods and learning assessment: a literature review A framework for teaching an undergraduate data analytics class An informal approach to management development at small and medium-sized manufacturing companies Computer self-efficacy in global contexts: appraising Chinese and Indian non-specialists' attitudes to common and advanced computer tasks Role of learning style preferences and interactive response systems on student learning outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1