压力测试和模型单一文化

Keshav Dogra, Kee-Choon Rhee
{"title":"压力测试和模型单一文化","authors":"Keshav Dogra, Kee-Choon Rhee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3208233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study whether regulators should reveal stress test results which contain imperfect information about banks’ financial health. Although disclosure restores market confidence in banks, it misclassifies some healthy banks as risky. This encourages banks to choose portfolios that are deemed safe by regulators, leading to model monoculture and making the financial system less diversified. Optimal policy involves a commitment to reveal stress test results only when adverse selection problems are very severe or very mild. Where possible, stress tests should be designed to avoid predictable bias against particular portfolios, even at the cost of reducing average accuracy.","PeriodicalId":414741,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Financial Markets Regulation eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress Tests and Model Monoculture\",\"authors\":\"Keshav Dogra, Kee-Choon Rhee\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3208233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study whether regulators should reveal stress test results which contain imperfect information about banks’ financial health. Although disclosure restores market confidence in banks, it misclassifies some healthy banks as risky. This encourages banks to choose portfolios that are deemed safe by regulators, leading to model monoculture and making the financial system less diversified. Optimal policy involves a commitment to reveal stress test results only when adverse selection problems are very severe or very mild. Where possible, stress tests should be designed to avoid predictable bias against particular portfolios, even at the cost of reducing average accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Modeling: Financial Markets Regulation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Modeling: Financial Markets Regulation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3208233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Financial Markets Regulation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3208233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

我们研究了监管机构是否应该披露包含银行财务健康状况不完全信息的压力测试结果。尽管信息披露恢复了市场对银行的信心,但它错误地将一些健康的银行划分为高风险银行。这鼓励银行选择监管机构认为安全的投资组合,导致模式单一,降低金融体系的多样性。最优政策包括承诺仅在逆向选择问题非常严重或非常轻微时披露压力测试结果。在可能的情况下,压力测试的设计应避免针对特定投资组合的可预测偏差,即使以降低平均准确性为代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stress Tests and Model Monoculture
We study whether regulators should reveal stress test results which contain imperfect information about banks’ financial health. Although disclosure restores market confidence in banks, it misclassifies some healthy banks as risky. This encourages banks to choose portfolios that are deemed safe by regulators, leading to model monoculture and making the financial system less diversified. Optimal policy involves a commitment to reveal stress test results only when adverse selection problems are very severe or very mild. Where possible, stress tests should be designed to avoid predictable bias against particular portfolios, even at the cost of reducing average accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic CoVaR Third Party Monitoring, Regulatory Compliance and Financial Reporting: Evidence from Banking Who watches the Auctioneer? Supervising primary bond markets to reduce agency costs MiCA and DeFi ('Proposal for a Regulation on Market in Crypto-Assets' and 'Decentralised Finance') COVID-19, Credit Risk and Macro Fundamentals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1