初级水平在心理教科书中的可读性

Neneng Farida Rahmah
{"title":"初级水平在心理教科书中的可读性","authors":"Neneng Farida Rahmah","doi":"10.32627/jepal.v3i1.543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study deals with Lexical Density (LD) and Grammatical Intricacy (GI) of juniors’ level in Mentari’s textbook to measure the readability of the text in the level. The objectives of the study are to find out the GI and LD which performed in the reading text of Mentari’s textbook and the highest readability in the level of the textbook. The main theory used in this study is the theory of Halliday (1985). This study was conducted by descriptive method with qualitative approach. The data analysis of this study was reading text of Mentari’s textbook for junior’s level. The result of the research revealed: (1) the average score of GI in each level are 1.42 in CONNECT1, 1.42 from CONNECT2, 1.42 in CONNECT3 and 1.41 in the CONNECT4. While, the average score lexical density in each level was CONNECT1 as 59.39 %, CONNECT2 as 63.18%, CONNECT3 as 58.60 % and CONNECT4 as 59.00%. (2) CONNECT2 is the highest lexical density of the textbooks, the result also showed that CONNECT 2 as the hardest text of the level in the juniors’ level.","PeriodicalId":118124,"journal":{"name":"JEPAL (Journal of English Pedagogy and Applied Linguistics)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE READABILITY OF JUNIOR’S LEVEL IN MENTARI’S TEXTBOOKS\",\"authors\":\"Neneng Farida Rahmah\",\"doi\":\"10.32627/jepal.v3i1.543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study deals with Lexical Density (LD) and Grammatical Intricacy (GI) of juniors’ level in Mentari’s textbook to measure the readability of the text in the level. The objectives of the study are to find out the GI and LD which performed in the reading text of Mentari’s textbook and the highest readability in the level of the textbook. The main theory used in this study is the theory of Halliday (1985). This study was conducted by descriptive method with qualitative approach. The data analysis of this study was reading text of Mentari’s textbook for junior’s level. The result of the research revealed: (1) the average score of GI in each level are 1.42 in CONNECT1, 1.42 from CONNECT2, 1.42 in CONNECT3 and 1.41 in the CONNECT4. While, the average score lexical density in each level was CONNECT1 as 59.39 %, CONNECT2 as 63.18%, CONNECT3 as 58.60 % and CONNECT4 as 59.00%. (2) CONNECT2 is the highest lexical density of the textbooks, the result also showed that CONNECT 2 as the hardest text of the level in the juniors’ level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JEPAL (Journal of English Pedagogy and Applied Linguistics)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JEPAL (Journal of English Pedagogy and Applied Linguistics)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32627/jepal.v3i1.543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEPAL (Journal of English Pedagogy and Applied Linguistics)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32627/jepal.v3i1.543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用词汇密度(LD)和语法复杂性(GI)来衡量初级水平的门塔里教科书文本的可读性。本研究的目的是找出在Mentari教科书的阅读文本中表现的GI和LD,以及教科书水平中最高的可读性。本研究使用的主要理论是韩礼德(1985)的理论。本研究采用定性方法结合描述性方法进行。本研究的数据分析是阅读Mentari初中水平教科书的文本。研究结果显示:(1)各等级的GI平均得分为:CONNECT1为1.42,CONNECT2为1.42,CONNECT3为1.42,CONNECT4为1.41。各水平的平均得分词汇密度分别为:CONNECT1为59.39%,CONNECT2为63.18%,CONNECT3为58.60%,CONNECT4为59.00%。(2) CONNECT2是词汇密度最高的教材,结果也表明CONNECT2是初级水平中最难的课文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE READABILITY OF JUNIOR’S LEVEL IN MENTARI’S TEXTBOOKS
This study deals with Lexical Density (LD) and Grammatical Intricacy (GI) of juniors’ level in Mentari’s textbook to measure the readability of the text in the level. The objectives of the study are to find out the GI and LD which performed in the reading text of Mentari’s textbook and the highest readability in the level of the textbook. The main theory used in this study is the theory of Halliday (1985). This study was conducted by descriptive method with qualitative approach. The data analysis of this study was reading text of Mentari’s textbook for junior’s level. The result of the research revealed: (1) the average score of GI in each level are 1.42 in CONNECT1, 1.42 from CONNECT2, 1.42 in CONNECT3 and 1.41 in the CONNECT4. While, the average score lexical density in each level was CONNECT1 as 59.39 %, CONNECT2 as 63.18%, CONNECT3 as 58.60 % and CONNECT4 as 59.00%. (2) CONNECT2 is the highest lexical density of the textbooks, the result also showed that CONNECT 2 as the hardest text of the level in the juniors’ level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Speedy English Grammar Application on Students’ Grammar Mastery in Simple Past Tense Understanding Analytical Exposition Text Writing with an SFL Approach Politeness Strategy of Prophet Muhammad SAW in the Riyadhus Shalihin Book Analysis of Sentence Types Production and Speech Disorders Characteristics in Wernicke’s Aphasia Sufferer Role of Video-Recorded Speaking Task in Improving Students’ Speaking Skill
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1