智能合约与国际仲裁

I. Shehata
{"title":"智能合约与国际仲裁","authors":"I. Shehata","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3290026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Increasing Growth of Conclusion of Smart Contracts on Ethereum raises numerous intriguing Legal Questions in respect of such Smart Contracts. The latter could be categorized into two Main Categories: (I) Weak Smart Contracts & (II) Strong Smart Contracts. Weak Smart Contracts are Smart Contracts which are Revocable or Relatively Irrevocable. On the other hand, Strong Smart Contracts are Smart Contracts which are Absolutely Irrevocable. Smart Contracts on Blockchains (i.e. Ethereum) usually take the form of Strong Smart Contracts. In this regard, this paper will focus solely on Strong Smart Contracts. First, we need to figure out whether there are Absolutely Irrevocable Agreements under Contract Law. If yes, then we need to explore how the National Courts and the Arbitral Tribunals have dealt with such Contracts in Practice. Second, most of the disputes that would arise out of Strong Smart Contracts would be dealing with cross-border transactions, and therefore arbitration would be normally the optimal dispute resolution mechanism for these disputes. Therefore, we need to determine the Legal Issues associated with the Arbitration of Disputes arising out of or in relation to Strong Smart Contracts. Precisely, we need to define the Safeguards that must be developed to ensure the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards for these Disputes on an International Level under the New York Convention. Third, Arbitration itself could take the form of a Strong Smart Contract. Thus, we have to consider whether Strong Smart Arbitration Contracts are legally viable in the first place. Specifically, whether the Absolute Irrevocability of such Strong Smart Arbitration Contracts would constitute an Obstacle to the Recognition & Enforcement of such Agreements before the National Courts. Finally, we could lend our help to the Tech Community through 3 main efforts: (1) Survey the Current Initiatives proposed in the White Papers prepared by the Tech Community; (2) Assess how far the Tech Community is taking into consideration all the Potential Legal Dilemmas associated with Smart Contracts' Dispute Resolution & (3) Prescribe Possible Legal Solutions that would also make sense from in the eyes of the Tech Community.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smart Contracts & International Arbitration\",\"authors\":\"I. Shehata\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3290026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Increasing Growth of Conclusion of Smart Contracts on Ethereum raises numerous intriguing Legal Questions in respect of such Smart Contracts. The latter could be categorized into two Main Categories: (I) Weak Smart Contracts & (II) Strong Smart Contracts. Weak Smart Contracts are Smart Contracts which are Revocable or Relatively Irrevocable. On the other hand, Strong Smart Contracts are Smart Contracts which are Absolutely Irrevocable. Smart Contracts on Blockchains (i.e. Ethereum) usually take the form of Strong Smart Contracts. In this regard, this paper will focus solely on Strong Smart Contracts. First, we need to figure out whether there are Absolutely Irrevocable Agreements under Contract Law. If yes, then we need to explore how the National Courts and the Arbitral Tribunals have dealt with such Contracts in Practice. Second, most of the disputes that would arise out of Strong Smart Contracts would be dealing with cross-border transactions, and therefore arbitration would be normally the optimal dispute resolution mechanism for these disputes. Therefore, we need to determine the Legal Issues associated with the Arbitration of Disputes arising out of or in relation to Strong Smart Contracts. Precisely, we need to define the Safeguards that must be developed to ensure the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards for these Disputes on an International Level under the New York Convention. Third, Arbitration itself could take the form of a Strong Smart Contract. Thus, we have to consider whether Strong Smart Arbitration Contracts are legally viable in the first place. Specifically, whether the Absolute Irrevocability of such Strong Smart Arbitration Contracts would constitute an Obstacle to the Recognition & Enforcement of such Agreements before the National Courts. Finally, we could lend our help to the Tech Community through 3 main efforts: (1) Survey the Current Initiatives proposed in the White Papers prepared by the Tech Community; (2) Assess how far the Tech Community is taking into consideration all the Potential Legal Dilemmas associated with Smart Contracts' Dispute Resolution & (3) Prescribe Possible Legal Solutions that would also make sense from in the eyes of the Tech Community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3290026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3290026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

以太坊智能合约缔结数量的不断增长,引发了许多关于此类智能合约的有趣法律问题。后者可以分为两大类:(I)弱智能合约和(II)强智能合约。弱智能合约是可撤销或相对不可撤销的智能合约。另一方面,强智能合约是绝对不可撤销的智能合约。区块链(即以太坊)上的智能合约通常采用强智能合约的形式。在这方面,本文将只关注强智能合约。首先,我们需要弄清楚合同法中是否存在绝对不可撤销协议。如果是,那么我们需要探讨国家法院和仲裁庭在实践中是如何处理此类合同的。其次,由强智能合约产生的大多数争议将涉及跨境交易,因此仲裁通常是这些争议的最佳争议解决机制。因此,我们需要确定与由强智能合约引起的或与之相关的争议仲裁相关的法律问题。确切地说,我们需要确定必须制定的保障措施,以确保根据《纽约公约》在国际一级承认和执行这些争端的仲裁裁决。第三,仲裁本身可以采取强智能合约的形式。因此,我们必须首先考虑强智能仲裁合同在法律上是否可行。具体而言,此类强智能仲裁合同的绝对不可撤销性是否会构成国家法院承认和执行此类协议的障碍。最后,我们可以透过以下三个主要工作向科技界提供帮助:(1)调查科技界在白皮书中提出的现行措施;(2)评估科技界在多大程度上考虑了与智能合约争议解决相关的所有潜在法律困境;(3)规定可能的法律解决方案,这些解决方案在科技界看来也是有意义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Smart Contracts & International Arbitration
The Increasing Growth of Conclusion of Smart Contracts on Ethereum raises numerous intriguing Legal Questions in respect of such Smart Contracts. The latter could be categorized into two Main Categories: (I) Weak Smart Contracts & (II) Strong Smart Contracts. Weak Smart Contracts are Smart Contracts which are Revocable or Relatively Irrevocable. On the other hand, Strong Smart Contracts are Smart Contracts which are Absolutely Irrevocable. Smart Contracts on Blockchains (i.e. Ethereum) usually take the form of Strong Smart Contracts. In this regard, this paper will focus solely on Strong Smart Contracts. First, we need to figure out whether there are Absolutely Irrevocable Agreements under Contract Law. If yes, then we need to explore how the National Courts and the Arbitral Tribunals have dealt with such Contracts in Practice. Second, most of the disputes that would arise out of Strong Smart Contracts would be dealing with cross-border transactions, and therefore arbitration would be normally the optimal dispute resolution mechanism for these disputes. Therefore, we need to determine the Legal Issues associated with the Arbitration of Disputes arising out of or in relation to Strong Smart Contracts. Precisely, we need to define the Safeguards that must be developed to ensure the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards for these Disputes on an International Level under the New York Convention. Third, Arbitration itself could take the form of a Strong Smart Contract. Thus, we have to consider whether Strong Smart Arbitration Contracts are legally viable in the first place. Specifically, whether the Absolute Irrevocability of such Strong Smart Arbitration Contracts would constitute an Obstacle to the Recognition & Enforcement of such Agreements before the National Courts. Finally, we could lend our help to the Tech Community through 3 main efforts: (1) Survey the Current Initiatives proposed in the White Papers prepared by the Tech Community; (2) Assess how far the Tech Community is taking into consideration all the Potential Legal Dilemmas associated with Smart Contracts' Dispute Resolution & (3) Prescribe Possible Legal Solutions that would also make sense from in the eyes of the Tech Community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La garantía legal del Estatuto del Consumidor como mecanismo para proteger al comprador frente a vicios inmobiliarios progresivos (The Legal Guarantee of the Consumers Statute as a Mechanism to Protect Buyer Front of Progressive Real Estate Vices) Solidarismo y contratos relacionales: alternativas frente a la pandemia de covid-19 (Contractual Solidarism and Relational Contract Theory: Alternative Approaches to Contract Law in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic) Error Correction Mechanisms for Transactional Script Smart Contracts The Shadows of Litigation Finance Malas leyes (Bad Law)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1