两种玻璃陶瓷不同表面处理后的透光性和强度评价

Mennatallah Wahba, T. Morsi, A. Mohamed, A. EL-Etreby
{"title":"两种玻璃陶瓷不同表面处理后的透光性和强度评价","authors":"Mennatallah Wahba, T. Morsi, A. Mohamed, A. EL-Etreby","doi":"10.21608/ajdsm.2022.159194.1364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the effect of different surface treatments on biaxial flexural strength and translucency of two different glass-ceramics. Materials and Methods: Sixty disc-shaped specimens (10 mm x 0.3 mm) were divided into two groups (n=30) according to the type of the ceramic material; lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD), and leucite reinforced ceramic (IPS Empress CAD). Each group was divided into three subgroups (n=10) according to the surface treatment applied; whether hydrofluoric acid etching, sandblasting, or no treatment. Translucency Parameter was measured over black and white backgrounds using dental spectrophotometer VITA Easyshade Compact, while bi-axial flexural strength was measured using a ball on ring fixture test. Data was statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc analysis (α = 0.05). Results: There was a significant difference (P <0.05) in translucency parameter between all surface treatments used for IPS E.max CAD groups, while for IPS Empress CAD there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in translucency between both the control and hydrofluoric acid groups as well as between hydrofluoric acid and sandblasted groups. There was no significant difference in bi-axial flexural strength between different types of surface treatments used for IPS E.max CAD. IPS Empress CAD groups showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) only between the control and the hydrofluoric acid groups. Conclusions: IPS E.max CAD had higher translucency and biaxial flexural strength. Different surface treatments used affected the flexural strength and translucency negatively in both materials used.","PeriodicalId":117944,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of translucency and strength of two glass ceramics after different surface treatments\",\"authors\":\"Mennatallah Wahba, T. Morsi, A. Mohamed, A. EL-Etreby\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ajdsm.2022.159194.1364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To investigate the effect of different surface treatments on biaxial flexural strength and translucency of two different glass-ceramics. Materials and Methods: Sixty disc-shaped specimens (10 mm x 0.3 mm) were divided into two groups (n=30) according to the type of the ceramic material; lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD), and leucite reinforced ceramic (IPS Empress CAD). Each group was divided into three subgroups (n=10) according to the surface treatment applied; whether hydrofluoric acid etching, sandblasting, or no treatment. Translucency Parameter was measured over black and white backgrounds using dental spectrophotometer VITA Easyshade Compact, while bi-axial flexural strength was measured using a ball on ring fixture test. Data was statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc analysis (α = 0.05). Results: There was a significant difference (P <0.05) in translucency parameter between all surface treatments used for IPS E.max CAD groups, while for IPS Empress CAD there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in translucency between both the control and hydrofluoric acid groups as well as between hydrofluoric acid and sandblasted groups. There was no significant difference in bi-axial flexural strength between different types of surface treatments used for IPS E.max CAD. IPS Empress CAD groups showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) only between the control and the hydrofluoric acid groups. Conclusions: IPS E.max CAD had higher translucency and biaxial flexural strength. Different surface treatments used affected the flexural strength and translucency negatively in both materials used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2022.159194.1364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2022.159194.1364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨不同表面处理对两种微晶玻璃双轴抗折强度和透光率的影响。材料与方法:60个盘状标本(10 mm × 0.3 mm)按陶瓷材料类型分为两组(n=30);二硅酸锂陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD)和白晶石增强陶瓷(IPS Empress CAD)。每组按表面处理情况分为3个亚组(n=10);无论是氢氟酸蚀刻、喷砂,还是无处理。采用牙科分光光度计VITA Easyshade Compact在黑白背景下测量半透明参数,采用球环夹具测试双轴弯曲强度。数据采用方差分析和Tukey事后分析(α = 0.05)进行统计学分析。结果:IPS E.max CAD各表面处理间的半透明参数差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),而IPS皇后CAD表面处理间的半透明参数差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),对照组与氢氟酸组、氢氟酸与喷砂组之间差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。不同表面处理对IPS E.max CAD的双轴抗折强度无显著影响。IPS皇后CAD组仅在对照组和氢氟酸组之间有显著差异(P < 0.05)。结论:IPS E.max CAD具有较高的透光性和双轴抗折强度。不同的表面处理对两种材料的抗弯强度和透光率都有负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of translucency and strength of two glass ceramics after different surface treatments
Objective: To investigate the effect of different surface treatments on biaxial flexural strength and translucency of two different glass-ceramics. Materials and Methods: Sixty disc-shaped specimens (10 mm x 0.3 mm) were divided into two groups (n=30) according to the type of the ceramic material; lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD), and leucite reinforced ceramic (IPS Empress CAD). Each group was divided into three subgroups (n=10) according to the surface treatment applied; whether hydrofluoric acid etching, sandblasting, or no treatment. Translucency Parameter was measured over black and white backgrounds using dental spectrophotometer VITA Easyshade Compact, while bi-axial flexural strength was measured using a ball on ring fixture test. Data was statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc analysis (α = 0.05). Results: There was a significant difference (P <0.05) in translucency parameter between all surface treatments used for IPS E.max CAD groups, while for IPS Empress CAD there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in translucency between both the control and hydrofluoric acid groups as well as between hydrofluoric acid and sandblasted groups. There was no significant difference in bi-axial flexural strength between different types of surface treatments used for IPS E.max CAD. IPS Empress CAD groups showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) only between the control and the hydrofluoric acid groups. Conclusions: IPS E.max CAD had higher translucency and biaxial flexural strength. Different surface treatments used affected the flexural strength and translucency negatively in both materials used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical effect of titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin and platelet- rich fibrin in treatment of gingival recession Fracture resistance of CAD CAM endocrowns bonded to teeth with different number of remaining walls :An In-Vitro Study. Evaluation of the effect of vitamin D on the salivary and serum levels of interleukin-8 in patients with periodontitis stage I and II grade A. The Effectiveness Of Topical Avocado In The Treatment Of Minor Recurrent Aphthous Ulceration: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Modulus of Elasticity of Different Resin Denture Base Materials: A Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1