半双工单中继网络中DDF和静态QMF通信策略的次优性研究

Hediyeh Soltanizadeh, F. Parvaresh
{"title":"半双工单中继网络中DDF和静态QMF通信策略的次优性研究","authors":"Hediyeh Soltanizadeh, F. Parvaresh","doi":"10.1109/IWCIT.2015.7140222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diversity-multiplexing trade-off (DMT) expresses the optimal trade-off between the transmission rate and the error probability for communications at high signal to noise ratios (SNR) in wireless networks with fading channels. For half-duplex single relay networks with quasi-static fading channels, if the average signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the source-relay (S-R) link is equal to the average SNR of the relay-destination (RD) link, quantize-map-and-forward (QMF) and dynamic decode-and-forward (DDF) strategies are DMT optimal at high and low multiplexing gains, respectively. In this paper, we show that DDF and SQMF strategies are not generally DMT optimal in half-duplex single relay networks when the average SNR of the S-R link and R-D link are not equal. We show that DMT of dynamic QMF strategy is strictly greater than DMT of DDF and static QMF strategies for a specific half-duplex single relay network at certain multiplexing gains.","PeriodicalId":166939,"journal":{"name":"2015 Iran Workshop on Communication and Information Theory (IWCIT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the suboptimality of DDF and static QMF communication strategies in half-duplex single relay networks\",\"authors\":\"Hediyeh Soltanizadeh, F. Parvaresh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWCIT.2015.7140222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The diversity-multiplexing trade-off (DMT) expresses the optimal trade-off between the transmission rate and the error probability for communications at high signal to noise ratios (SNR) in wireless networks with fading channels. For half-duplex single relay networks with quasi-static fading channels, if the average signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the source-relay (S-R) link is equal to the average SNR of the relay-destination (RD) link, quantize-map-and-forward (QMF) and dynamic decode-and-forward (DDF) strategies are DMT optimal at high and low multiplexing gains, respectively. In this paper, we show that DDF and SQMF strategies are not generally DMT optimal in half-duplex single relay networks when the average SNR of the S-R link and R-D link are not equal. We show that DMT of dynamic QMF strategy is strictly greater than DMT of DDF and static QMF strategies for a specific half-duplex single relay network at certain multiplexing gains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Iran Workshop on Communication and Information Theory (IWCIT)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Iran Workshop on Communication and Information Theory (IWCIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCIT.2015.7140222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Iran Workshop on Communication and Information Theory (IWCIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCIT.2015.7140222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

分集复用权衡(DMT)是在信道衰落的无线网络中高信噪比通信的传输速率和误码率之间的最优权衡。对于具有准静态衰落信道的半双工单中继网络,当源中继(S-R)链路的平均信噪比(SNR)等于中继目的地(RD)链路的平均信噪比(SNR)时,在高复用增益和低复用增益下,量化映射转发(QMF)和动态解码转发(DDF)策略分别是DMT最优策略。本文证明了在半双工单中继网络中,当S-R链路和R-D链路的平均信噪比不相等时,DDF和SQMF策略通常不是DMT最优策略。我们证明了在一定的复用增益下,对于特定的半双工单中继网络,动态QMF策略的DMT严格大于DDF和静态QMF策略的DMT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the suboptimality of DDF and static QMF communication strategies in half-duplex single relay networks
The diversity-multiplexing trade-off (DMT) expresses the optimal trade-off between the transmission rate and the error probability for communications at high signal to noise ratios (SNR) in wireless networks with fading channels. For half-duplex single relay networks with quasi-static fading channels, if the average signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the source-relay (S-R) link is equal to the average SNR of the relay-destination (RD) link, quantize-map-and-forward (QMF) and dynamic decode-and-forward (DDF) strategies are DMT optimal at high and low multiplexing gains, respectively. In this paper, we show that DDF and SQMF strategies are not generally DMT optimal in half-duplex single relay networks when the average SNR of the S-R link and R-D link are not equal. We show that DMT of dynamic QMF strategy is strictly greater than DMT of DDF and static QMF strategies for a specific half-duplex single relay network at certain multiplexing gains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A novel approach to mathematical multiple criteria decision making methods based on information theoretic measures An iterative bit flipping based decoding algorithm for LDPC codes Statistical characterization of the output of nonlinear power-cubic detection unit for ultrashort light pulse communication in the presence of Gaussian noise Perfect interference alignment utilizing channel structure One-level LDPC lattice codes for the relay channels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1