{"title":"考虑角度偏移的三维衰落信道模型性能分析","authors":"Haifeng Tan, Jianhua Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICCCHINA.2018.8641141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As one of the most promising techniques for the 5th Generation (5G) mobile communication systems, Three dimensional (3D) Multiple Input and Multiple Output (MIMO) has the potential of improving spectrum efficiency, but it needs further research. For 3D channel model, the elevation angle should be accurately included. Conventionally 3D channel is modeled with an assumption that the mean elevation angle of multipath is coincided with the line of sight (LOS) direction. To investigate its authenticity, we conduct extensive 3D multiple antenna field channel measurements with 100 MHz bandwidth in a typical urban microcell (UMi) scenario. The elevation angles of each multipath is extracted from the measurement data and its statistical propagation characteristics are analyzed. It is found that for LOS case, this assumption holds. However, for none line of sight (NLOS) case, there exists an elevation angle difference between the mean and the line directly connecting transmitting and receiving antenna, which is defined as elevation angle offset. The performance of the 3D channel model with the elevation angle offset is validated in terms of channel capacity comparing to the 3D channel model without angle offset. Results show that the 3D channel model with angle offset fits the real measured data better.","PeriodicalId":170216,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Analysis of Three Dimensional Fading Channel Model with Angle Offset\",\"authors\":\"Haifeng Tan, Jianhua Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCCHINA.2018.8641141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As one of the most promising techniques for the 5th Generation (5G) mobile communication systems, Three dimensional (3D) Multiple Input and Multiple Output (MIMO) has the potential of improving spectrum efficiency, but it needs further research. For 3D channel model, the elevation angle should be accurately included. Conventionally 3D channel is modeled with an assumption that the mean elevation angle of multipath is coincided with the line of sight (LOS) direction. To investigate its authenticity, we conduct extensive 3D multiple antenna field channel measurements with 100 MHz bandwidth in a typical urban microcell (UMi) scenario. The elevation angles of each multipath is extracted from the measurement data and its statistical propagation characteristics are analyzed. It is found that for LOS case, this assumption holds. However, for none line of sight (NLOS) case, there exists an elevation angle difference between the mean and the line directly connecting transmitting and receiving antenna, which is defined as elevation angle offset. The performance of the 3D channel model with the elevation angle offset is validated in terms of channel capacity comparing to the 3D channel model without angle offset. Results show that the 3D channel model with angle offset fits the real measured data better.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCHINA.2018.8641141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCHINA.2018.8641141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
作为第5代(5G)移动通信系统中最有前途的技术之一,三维多输入多输出(Three dimensional Multiple Input and Multiple Output, MIMO)技术具有提高频谱效率的潜力,但需要进一步研究。对于三维通道模型,需要精确地包含俯仰角。传统的三维通道建模假设多路径平均仰角与视线方向一致。为了研究其真实性,我们在典型的城市微蜂窝(UMi)场景中以100 MHz带宽进行了广泛的3D多天线场信道测量。从测量数据中提取各多径仰角,分析其统计传播特性。研究发现,对于LOS情况,这一假设成立。而在无瞄准线情况下,均值与收发天线直连线之间存在一个仰角差,定义为仰角偏移。对比无角度偏移的三维通道模型,验证了有仰角偏移的三维通道模型在通道容量方面的性能。结果表明,考虑角度偏移的三维通道模型能较好地拟合实际测量数据。
Performance Analysis of Three Dimensional Fading Channel Model with Angle Offset
As one of the most promising techniques for the 5th Generation (5G) mobile communication systems, Three dimensional (3D) Multiple Input and Multiple Output (MIMO) has the potential of improving spectrum efficiency, but it needs further research. For 3D channel model, the elevation angle should be accurately included. Conventionally 3D channel is modeled with an assumption that the mean elevation angle of multipath is coincided with the line of sight (LOS) direction. To investigate its authenticity, we conduct extensive 3D multiple antenna field channel measurements with 100 MHz bandwidth in a typical urban microcell (UMi) scenario. The elevation angles of each multipath is extracted from the measurement data and its statistical propagation characteristics are analyzed. It is found that for LOS case, this assumption holds. However, for none line of sight (NLOS) case, there exists an elevation angle difference between the mean and the line directly connecting transmitting and receiving antenna, which is defined as elevation angle offset. The performance of the 3D channel model with the elevation angle offset is validated in terms of channel capacity comparing to the 3D channel model without angle offset. Results show that the 3D channel model with angle offset fits the real measured data better.