每个人都放弃——最终:理解网上购物体验

K. Renaud, T. Cockshott, M. Hair
{"title":"每个人都放弃——最终:理解网上购物体验","authors":"K. Renaud, T. Cockshott, M. Hair","doi":"10.1109/CEC.2009.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many e-stores use conversion rates, ie. how many people convert shopping baskets to actualpurchases as a primary indicator of success. A low conversion rate is used as a reason for spending moretime and effort on improving the usability of the site, assuming thatthe fault must be with the usability of the website.There is some question, however, about whether this focusis justified. We argue here that the online shopping experience has adistinct nature of its own, having different characteristics andencouraging different behaviours. We therefore carried out a study in order tounderstand e-shopper behaviours - specifically their usage ofthe electronic shopping basket and wish list. We used an online survey to ask anumber of questions calculated to explore this usage. We report hereon our findings.We found that eventually, along with becoming more mature in the usageof online ecommerce, every e-shopper will abandon the shoppingbasket. Hence abandonment rates should not be used as a successindicator and a low conversion rate does not indicate that a site'susabiity is poor. We also identified three categories of e-shopper, thevague, the cost conscious and the window shoppers. The first group had the strongest intention to purchase and were the least likely toabandon their shopping baskets with the other two groups being morelikely to abandon.Finally there werealso two distinct types of wish list user: the cleaners and thehoarders. The former were cost conscious and appeared to use the wishlist to monitor prices. The hoarders tended to have used e-commercefor longer and used the wish list to keep track of items they mightwell like to purchase in the future.","PeriodicalId":384060,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Everyone Abandons - Eventually: Understanding the Online Shopping Experience\",\"authors\":\"K. Renaud, T. Cockshott, M. Hair\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEC.2009.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many e-stores use conversion rates, ie. how many people convert shopping baskets to actualpurchases as a primary indicator of success. A low conversion rate is used as a reason for spending moretime and effort on improving the usability of the site, assuming thatthe fault must be with the usability of the website.There is some question, however, about whether this focusis justified. We argue here that the online shopping experience has adistinct nature of its own, having different characteristics andencouraging different behaviours. We therefore carried out a study in order tounderstand e-shopper behaviours - specifically their usage ofthe electronic shopping basket and wish list. We used an online survey to ask anumber of questions calculated to explore this usage. We report hereon our findings.We found that eventually, along with becoming more mature in the usageof online ecommerce, every e-shopper will abandon the shoppingbasket. Hence abandonment rates should not be used as a successindicator and a low conversion rate does not indicate that a site'susabiity is poor. We also identified three categories of e-shopper, thevague, the cost conscious and the window shoppers. The first group had the strongest intention to purchase and were the least likely toabandon their shopping baskets with the other two groups being morelikely to abandon.Finally there werealso two distinct types of wish list user: the cleaners and thehoarders. The former were cost conscious and appeared to use the wishlist to monitor prices. The hoarders tended to have used e-commercefor longer and used the wish list to keep track of items they mightwell like to purchase in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2009.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2009.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

许多电子商店使用转化率,即。有多少人将购物篮转化为实际购买作为成功的主要指标。低转化率被用作花费更多时间和精力来改善网站可用性的理由,假设错误一定是网站的可用性。然而,这种关注是否合理存在一些问题。我们认为,在线购物体验有其独特的本质,具有不同的特征,并鼓励不同的行为。因此,我们进行了一项研究,以了解电子购物者的行为,特别是他们对电子购物篮和愿望清单的使用。我们使用了一个在线调查,问了一些计算出来的问题来探索这种用法。我们在此报告我们的发现。我们发现,最终,随着在线电子商务的使用越来越成熟,每个电子购物者都会放弃购物篮。因此,放弃率不应该作为一个成功的指标,低转化率并不表明一个网站的可持续性差。我们还确定了三类电子购物者:模糊型、成本意识型和橱窗购物者。第一组人有最强的购买意愿,最不可能放弃购物篮,而另外两组人更可能放弃购物篮。最后,还有两种不同类型的愿望清单使用者:清洁工和囤积者。前者有成本意识,似乎用愿望清单来监控价格。囤积者倾向于使用电子商务的时间更长,并使用愿望清单来记录他们将来可能想购买的物品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Everyone Abandons - Eventually: Understanding the Online Shopping Experience
Many e-stores use conversion rates, ie. how many people convert shopping baskets to actualpurchases as a primary indicator of success. A low conversion rate is used as a reason for spending moretime and effort on improving the usability of the site, assuming thatthe fault must be with the usability of the website.There is some question, however, about whether this focusis justified. We argue here that the online shopping experience has adistinct nature of its own, having different characteristics andencouraging different behaviours. We therefore carried out a study in order tounderstand e-shopper behaviours - specifically their usage ofthe electronic shopping basket and wish list. We used an online survey to ask anumber of questions calculated to explore this usage. We report hereon our findings.We found that eventually, along with becoming more mature in the usageof online ecommerce, every e-shopper will abandon the shoppingbasket. Hence abandonment rates should not be used as a successindicator and a low conversion rate does not indicate that a site'susabiity is poor. We also identified three categories of e-shopper, thevague, the cost conscious and the window shoppers. The first group had the strongest intention to purchase and were the least likely toabandon their shopping baskets with the other two groups being morelikely to abandon.Finally there werealso two distinct types of wish list user: the cleaners and thehoarders. The former were cost conscious and appeared to use the wishlist to monitor prices. The hoarders tended to have used e-commercefor longer and used the wish list to keep track of items they mightwell like to purchase in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web-Based Process Portals: Powering Business Process Management within Large Organisations Time-BPMN Process Mining of RFID-Based Supply Chains SARI-SQL: Event Query Language for Event Analysis Decision-Support for Optimizing Supply Chain Formation Based on CSET Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1