围绕区块的价格行为:不对称或买卖偏差

A. Frino, Vito Mollica, T. Walter
{"title":"围绕区块的价格行为:不对称或买卖偏差","authors":"A. Frino, Vito Mollica, T. Walter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.394987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses price effects of block trades for the 30 stocks that comprise the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the period January 1993 to October 2001. Previous research shows prices revert following sales, but remain high after buys, creating an asymmetry between block purchases and sales. Extant literature has offered several conjectures as to the source of the asymmetry. We replicate the asymmetry documented in previous literature and provide a new conjecture as to its source, specifically bid-ask bias. Results show that purging block trade price effects of bid-ask bias produces symmetry in the behaviour of block trade price effects. This suggests research design issues are driving the asymmetry documented in previous literature, and that purchases are not more informative than sales.","PeriodicalId":126917,"journal":{"name":"European Financial Management Association Meetings (EFMA) (Archive)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Price Behaviour Surrounding Blocks: Asymmetric or Bid-Ask Bias\",\"authors\":\"A. Frino, Vito Mollica, T. Walter\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.394987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyses price effects of block trades for the 30 stocks that comprise the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the period January 1993 to October 2001. Previous research shows prices revert following sales, but remain high after buys, creating an asymmetry between block purchases and sales. Extant literature has offered several conjectures as to the source of the asymmetry. We replicate the asymmetry documented in previous literature and provide a new conjecture as to its source, specifically bid-ask bias. Results show that purging block trade price effects of bid-ask bias produces symmetry in the behaviour of block trade price effects. This suggests research design issues are driving the asymmetry documented in previous literature, and that purchases are not more informative than sales.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Financial Management Association Meetings (EFMA) (Archive)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Financial Management Association Meetings (EFMA) (Archive)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.394987\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Financial Management Association Meetings (EFMA) (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.394987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文分析了1993年1月至2001年10月期间构成道琼斯工业平均指数的30只股票的大宗交易对价格的影响。此前的研究表明,价格在卖出后会回升,但在买入后仍保持高位,这就造成了大宗购买和卖出之间的不对称。现存文献对这种不对称的来源提出了几种猜想。我们复制了以前文献中记录的不对称,并提供了一个关于其来源的新猜想,特别是买卖偏差。研究结果表明,消除买卖偏差的大宗交易价格效应会产生大宗交易价格效应行为的对称性。这表明研究设计问题导致了先前文献中记录的不对称,并且购买并不比销售提供更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Price Behaviour Surrounding Blocks: Asymmetric or Bid-Ask Bias
This paper analyses price effects of block trades for the 30 stocks that comprise the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the period January 1993 to October 2001. Previous research shows prices revert following sales, but remain high after buys, creating an asymmetry between block purchases and sales. Extant literature has offered several conjectures as to the source of the asymmetry. We replicate the asymmetry documented in previous literature and provide a new conjecture as to its source, specifically bid-ask bias. Results show that purging block trade price effects of bid-ask bias produces symmetry in the behaviour of block trade price effects. This suggests research design issues are driving the asymmetry documented in previous literature, and that purchases are not more informative than sales.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Valuing Companies by Cash Flow Discounting: Ten Methods and Nine Theories Learning About Beta: Time-Varying Factor Loadings, Expected Returns, and the Conditional CAPM Equivalence of the Different Discounted Cash Flow Valuation Methods: Different Alternatives for Determining the Discounted Value of Tax Shields and Their Implications for the Valuation Capital Structure in Venture Finance The International Evidence on Performance and Equity Ownership by Insiders, Blockholders, and Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1