推特上的埃及世俗vs伊斯兰两极化

Ingmar Weber, Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella, A. Batayneh
{"title":"推特上的埃及世俗vs伊斯兰两极化","authors":"Ingmar Weber, Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella, A. Batayneh","doi":"10.1145/2492517.2492557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use public data from Twitter, both in English and Arabic, to study the phenomenon of secular vs. Islamist polarization in Twitter. Starting with a set of prominent seed Twitter users from both camps, we follow retweeting edges to obtain an extended network of users with inferred political orientation. We present an in-depth description of the members of the two camps, both in terms of behavior on Twitter and in terms of offline characteristics such as gender. Through the identification of partisan users, we compute a valence on the secular vs. Islamist axis for hashtags and use this information both to analyze topical interests and to quantify how polarized society as a whole is at a given point in time. For the last 12 months, large values on this “polarization barometer” coincided with periods of violence. Tweets are furthermore annotated using hand-crafted dictionaries to quantify the usage of (i) religious terms, (ii) derogatory terms referring to other religions, and (ii) references to charitable acts. The combination of all the information allows us to test and quantify a number of stereo-typical hypotheses such as (i) that religiosity and political Islamism are correlated, (ii) that political Islamism and negative views on other religions are linked, (iii) that religiosity goes hand in hand with charitable giving, and (iv) that the followers of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood are more tightly connected and expressing themselves “in unison” than the secular opposition. Whereas a lot of existing literature on the Arab Spring and the Egyptian Revolution is largely of qualitative and descriptive nature, our contribution lies in providing a quantitative and data-driven analysis of online communication in this dynamic and politically charged part of the world.","PeriodicalId":442230,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2013)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"121","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secular vs. Islamist polarization in Egypt on Twitter\",\"authors\":\"Ingmar Weber, Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella, A. Batayneh\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2492517.2492557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We use public data from Twitter, both in English and Arabic, to study the phenomenon of secular vs. Islamist polarization in Twitter. Starting with a set of prominent seed Twitter users from both camps, we follow retweeting edges to obtain an extended network of users with inferred political orientation. We present an in-depth description of the members of the two camps, both in terms of behavior on Twitter and in terms of offline characteristics such as gender. Through the identification of partisan users, we compute a valence on the secular vs. Islamist axis for hashtags and use this information both to analyze topical interests and to quantify how polarized society as a whole is at a given point in time. For the last 12 months, large values on this “polarization barometer” coincided with periods of violence. Tweets are furthermore annotated using hand-crafted dictionaries to quantify the usage of (i) religious terms, (ii) derogatory terms referring to other religions, and (ii) references to charitable acts. The combination of all the information allows us to test and quantify a number of stereo-typical hypotheses such as (i) that religiosity and political Islamism are correlated, (ii) that political Islamism and negative views on other religions are linked, (iii) that religiosity goes hand in hand with charitable giving, and (iv) that the followers of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood are more tightly connected and expressing themselves “in unison” than the secular opposition. Whereas a lot of existing literature on the Arab Spring and the Egyptian Revolution is largely of qualitative and descriptive nature, our contribution lies in providing a quantitative and data-driven analysis of online communication in this dynamic and politically charged part of the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2013)\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"121\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2013)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2492517.2492557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2013)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2492517.2492557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 121

摘要

我们使用Twitter上的公开数据,包括英语和阿拉伯语,来研究Twitter上世俗与伊斯兰教的两极分化现象。从两个阵营的一组突出的种子Twitter用户开始,我们遵循转发边缘,以获得具有推断政治倾向的用户扩展网络。我们对这两个阵营的成员进行了深入的描述,既包括Twitter上的行为,也包括性别等线下特征。通过对党派用户的识别,我们计算出标签在世俗与伊斯兰主义轴心上的价值,并利用这些信息来分析话题兴趣,并量化在给定时间点上,整个社会的两极分化程度。在过去的12个月里,这个“两极分化晴雨表”的大数值与暴力事件的发生时间一致。此外,使用手工制作的词典对推文进行注释,以量化(i)宗教术语,(ii)涉及其他宗教的贬损术语,以及(ii)涉及慈善行为的使用。所有这些信息的结合使我们能够测试和量化一些刻板的假设,如:(1)宗教虔诚和政治伊斯兰主义是相关的,(2)政治伊斯兰主义和对其他宗教的负面看法是相关的,(3)宗教虔诚与慈善捐赠密切相关,(4)埃及穆斯林兄弟会的追随者比世俗反对派联系更紧密,表达自己的“一致”。鉴于许多关于阿拉伯之春和埃及革命的现有文献主要是定性和描述性的,我们的贡献在于为这个充满活力和政治色彩的世界提供定量和数据驱动的在线交流分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Secular vs. Islamist polarization in Egypt on Twitter
We use public data from Twitter, both in English and Arabic, to study the phenomenon of secular vs. Islamist polarization in Twitter. Starting with a set of prominent seed Twitter users from both camps, we follow retweeting edges to obtain an extended network of users with inferred political orientation. We present an in-depth description of the members of the two camps, both in terms of behavior on Twitter and in terms of offline characteristics such as gender. Through the identification of partisan users, we compute a valence on the secular vs. Islamist axis for hashtags and use this information both to analyze topical interests and to quantify how polarized society as a whole is at a given point in time. For the last 12 months, large values on this “polarization barometer” coincided with periods of violence. Tweets are furthermore annotated using hand-crafted dictionaries to quantify the usage of (i) religious terms, (ii) derogatory terms referring to other religions, and (ii) references to charitable acts. The combination of all the information allows us to test and quantify a number of stereo-typical hypotheses such as (i) that religiosity and political Islamism are correlated, (ii) that political Islamism and negative views on other religions are linked, (iii) that religiosity goes hand in hand with charitable giving, and (iv) that the followers of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood are more tightly connected and expressing themselves “in unison” than the secular opposition. Whereas a lot of existing literature on the Arab Spring and the Egyptian Revolution is largely of qualitative and descriptive nature, our contribution lies in providing a quantitative and data-driven analysis of online communication in this dynamic and politically charged part of the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statistical analysis and implications of SNS search in under-developed countries Identifying unreliable sources of skill and competency information Assessing group cohesion in homophily networks Exploiting online social data in ontology learning for event tracking and emergency response Event identification for social streams using keyword-based evolving graph sequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1