葡萄牙恢复和复原计划:

R. Pedro
{"title":"葡萄牙恢复和复原计划:","authors":"R. Pedro","doi":"10.21552/epppl/2022/1/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the legal framework implemented in Portugal for the execution of its Recovery and Resilience Plan. Starting from the analysis of the legal framework offered by the European Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), it critically analyses the main regulations created on a special or exceptional basis for the implementation of the Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan (PRRP), with emphasis on the governance model, but also on the exceptional measures to facilitate budgetary procedures, expenditure authorisation and staff hiring and also special public procurement measures. As these special and exceptional measures are, as a rule, intended to relax or reduce the mechanisms of prior administrative control of certain procedures, the external control of special public procurement measures by the Portuguese Court of Auditors was strengthened. Lastly, and despite the Portuguese legislator not dedicating special legislation to it, the most appropriate means for resolving any legal disputes arising from the implementation of the Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan are addressed. The present article will be divided and published in two parts. The first part will be dedicated to the RRF, the PRRP and special measures for its implementation already with reference to the special public procurement measures approved in this context. The second part will be dedicated to the analysis of the special measures for public procurement and the appropriate means for the resolution of possible disputes arising from the execution of the national RRP. In each part we will present the respective conclusions. Keywords: EU Next Generation Funds, Recovery and Resilience Facility, Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan, administrative arbitration","PeriodicalId":176734,"journal":{"name":"European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan:\",\"authors\":\"R. Pedro\",\"doi\":\"10.21552/epppl/2022/1/4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses the legal framework implemented in Portugal for the execution of its Recovery and Resilience Plan. Starting from the analysis of the legal framework offered by the European Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), it critically analyses the main regulations created on a special or exceptional basis for the implementation of the Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan (PRRP), with emphasis on the governance model, but also on the exceptional measures to facilitate budgetary procedures, expenditure authorisation and staff hiring and also special public procurement measures. As these special and exceptional measures are, as a rule, intended to relax or reduce the mechanisms of prior administrative control of certain procedures, the external control of special public procurement measures by the Portuguese Court of Auditors was strengthened. Lastly, and despite the Portuguese legislator not dedicating special legislation to it, the most appropriate means for resolving any legal disputes arising from the implementation of the Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan are addressed. The present article will be divided and published in two parts. The first part will be dedicated to the RRF, the PRRP and special measures for its implementation already with reference to the special public procurement measures approved in this context. The second part will be dedicated to the analysis of the special measures for public procurement and the appropriate means for the resolution of possible disputes arising from the execution of the national RRP. In each part we will present the respective conclusions. Keywords: EU Next Generation Funds, Recovery and Resilience Facility, Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan, administrative arbitration\",\"PeriodicalId\":176734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21552/epppl/2022/1/4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/epppl/2022/1/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了在葡萄牙实施的法律框架,以执行其恢复和弹性计划。本文从分析欧洲复苏和弹性基金(RRF)提供的法律框架开始,批判性地分析了为实施葡萄牙复苏和弹性计划(PRRP)而在特殊或特殊基础上制定的主要法规,重点是治理模式,以及促进预算程序、支出授权和员工招聘的特殊措施,以及特殊的公共采购措施。由于这些特别和例外措施通常旨在放宽或减少对某些程序进行事先行政控制的机制,因此加强了葡萄牙审计法院对特别公共采购措施的外部控制。最后,尽管葡萄牙立法者没有为此专门立法,但解决因实施《葡萄牙恢复和复原计划》而产生的任何法律纠纷的最适当手段得到了解决。本文将分为两部分发表。第一部分将专门讨论区域资源储备方案、减贫方案和已经参照在这方面核可的特别公共采购措施实施该方案的特别措施。第二部分将专门分析公共采购的特别措施,以及解决国家采购方案执行过程中可能产生的争端的适当手段。在每一部分中,我们将给出各自的结论。关键词:欧盟下一代基金,恢复与弹性基金,葡萄牙恢复与弹性计划,行政仲裁
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan:
This article analyses the legal framework implemented in Portugal for the execution of its Recovery and Resilience Plan. Starting from the analysis of the legal framework offered by the European Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), it critically analyses the main regulations created on a special or exceptional basis for the implementation of the Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan (PRRP), with emphasis on the governance model, but also on the exceptional measures to facilitate budgetary procedures, expenditure authorisation and staff hiring and also special public procurement measures. As these special and exceptional measures are, as a rule, intended to relax or reduce the mechanisms of prior administrative control of certain procedures, the external control of special public procurement measures by the Portuguese Court of Auditors was strengthened. Lastly, and despite the Portuguese legislator not dedicating special legislation to it, the most appropriate means for resolving any legal disputes arising from the implementation of the Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan are addressed. The present article will be divided and published in two parts. The first part will be dedicated to the RRF, the PRRP and special measures for its implementation already with reference to the special public procurement measures approved in this context. The second part will be dedicated to the analysis of the special measures for public procurement and the appropriate means for the resolution of possible disputes arising from the execution of the national RRP. In each part we will present the respective conclusions. Keywords: EU Next Generation Funds, Recovery and Resilience Facility, Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan, administrative arbitration
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ukraine ∙ Challenges in Attracting the Private Sector to Infrastructure Recovery in Ukraine The Possibility of Imposing a Fine on Both Parties Due to Unlawful Contract Amendment (Case C-263/19 T-Systems Magyarország) Switzerland ∙ The Revised Swiss Public Procurement Law: More Quality and Sustainability The Opportunity of the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the Adaptation of the Spanish Public Procurement Framework Proving Compliance with the Condition of Economic Dependence in In-House Contracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1