土耳其真实学习实践的有效性:一项元分析

Tutal Özgür
{"title":"土耳其真实学习实践的有效性:一项元分析","authors":"Tutal Özgür","doi":"10.26634/jpsy.17.1.19424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Authentic learning is gaining attention due to being perceived as a more engaging and effective way of teaching students. Many schools are incorporating authentic learning into their curricula, and numerous studies have also been conducted investigating the effectiveness of authentic learning in improving student outcomes. Various primary studies have been conducted in Turkey examining the effect of authentic learning on academic achievement and learning retention, which have an important place among learning outcomes. It was observed that the results of these individual studies reported different effect sizes on the effectiveness of authentic learning. This review aimed to report the overall effect sizes by analyzing the results of experimental and quasi-experimental studies examining the effect of authentic learning on academic achievement and learning retention through meta-analysis. Of the 180 studies listed as a result of the literature search, 11 studies (13 effect sizes) for academic achievement and four studies (six effect sizes) for the learning retention variables that meet the inclusion criteria were coded and analyzed. The results of the analysis showed a moderate overall effect size for the effectiveness of authentic learning on both academic achievement (g = 0.991) and learning retention (g = 0.925). It is possible to say that the overall effect sizes obtained as a result of the meta-analysis are moderate, quite remarkable for educational research, and that authentic learning is more effective in increasing academic achievement and learning retention than traditional education processes.","PeriodicalId":266504,"journal":{"name":"i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of authentic learning practices in turkey: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Tutal Özgür\",\"doi\":\"10.26634/jpsy.17.1.19424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Authentic learning is gaining attention due to being perceived as a more engaging and effective way of teaching students. Many schools are incorporating authentic learning into their curricula, and numerous studies have also been conducted investigating the effectiveness of authentic learning in improving student outcomes. Various primary studies have been conducted in Turkey examining the effect of authentic learning on academic achievement and learning retention, which have an important place among learning outcomes. It was observed that the results of these individual studies reported different effect sizes on the effectiveness of authentic learning. This review aimed to report the overall effect sizes by analyzing the results of experimental and quasi-experimental studies examining the effect of authentic learning on academic achievement and learning retention through meta-analysis. Of the 180 studies listed as a result of the literature search, 11 studies (13 effect sizes) for academic achievement and four studies (six effect sizes) for the learning retention variables that meet the inclusion criteria were coded and analyzed. The results of the analysis showed a moderate overall effect size for the effectiveness of authentic learning on both academic achievement (g = 0.991) and learning retention (g = 0.925). It is possible to say that the overall effect sizes obtained as a result of the meta-analysis are moderate, quite remarkable for educational research, and that authentic learning is more effective in increasing academic achievement and learning retention than traditional education processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":266504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.17.1.19424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.17.1.19424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于被认为是一种更吸引人、更有效的教学方式,真实学习越来越受到关注。许多学校正在将真实学习纳入他们的课程,许多研究也在调查真实学习在提高学生成绩方面的有效性。土耳其已经进行了各种初步研究,考察真实学习对学业成绩和学习保留的影响,这在学习成果中占有重要地位。我们观察到,这些个体研究的结果对真实学习的有效性有不同的影响大小。本研究旨在通过meta分析分析真实学习对学业成就和学习保留的影响,并分析实验和准实验研究的结果,以报告整体效应大小。在文献检索结果中列出的180项研究中,符合纳入标准的11项关于学业成就的研究(13个效应量)和4项关于学习保留变量的研究(6个效应量)被编码和分析。分析结果显示,真实学习的有效性对学业成绩(g = 0.991)和学习保留(g = 0.925)的总体效应量均为中等。可以说,通过荟萃分析获得的总体效应大小是中等的,对于教育研究来说是相当显著的,并且真实的学习比传统的教育过程在提高学业成绩和学习保留方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of authentic learning practices in turkey: A meta-analysis
Authentic learning is gaining attention due to being perceived as a more engaging and effective way of teaching students. Many schools are incorporating authentic learning into their curricula, and numerous studies have also been conducted investigating the effectiveness of authentic learning in improving student outcomes. Various primary studies have been conducted in Turkey examining the effect of authentic learning on academic achievement and learning retention, which have an important place among learning outcomes. It was observed that the results of these individual studies reported different effect sizes on the effectiveness of authentic learning. This review aimed to report the overall effect sizes by analyzing the results of experimental and quasi-experimental studies examining the effect of authentic learning on academic achievement and learning retention through meta-analysis. Of the 180 studies listed as a result of the literature search, 11 studies (13 effect sizes) for academic achievement and four studies (six effect sizes) for the learning retention variables that meet the inclusion criteria were coded and analyzed. The results of the analysis showed a moderate overall effect size for the effectiveness of authentic learning on both academic achievement (g = 0.991) and learning retention (g = 0.925). It is possible to say that the overall effect sizes obtained as a result of the meta-analysis are moderate, quite remarkable for educational research, and that authentic learning is more effective in increasing academic achievement and learning retention than traditional education processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Co-caring relationships: How parent and child characteristics matter Bringing mindfulness to teacher professional development for social-emotional competence in teaching Perspectives and attitudes towards sustainability among science, preschool, and primary school teachers Constructivism and diversified role of teachers and students in teaching and learning Scientific temper among undergraduate students: A comparative study based on demographic variables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1