表征X86和ARM无服务器性能变化:自然语言处理案例研究

Danielle Lambion, Robert Schmitz, R. Cordingly, Navid Heydari, W. Lloyd
{"title":"表征X86和ARM无服务器性能变化:自然语言处理案例研究","authors":"Danielle Lambion, Robert Schmitz, R. Cordingly, Navid Heydari, W. Lloyd","doi":"10.1145/3491204.3543506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we leverage a Natural Language Processing (NLP) pipeline for topic modeling consisting of three functions for data preprocessing, model training, and inferencing to analyze serverless platform performance variation. Specifically, we investigated performance using x86_64 and ARM64 processors over a 24-hour day starting at midnight local time on four cloud regions across three continents on AWS Lambda. We identified public cloud resource contention by leveraging the CPU steal metric, and examined relationships to NLP pipeline runtime. Intel x86_64 Xeon processors at the same clock rate as ARM64 processors (Graviton 2) were more than 23% faster for model training, but ARM64 processors were faster for data preprocessing and inferencing. Use of the Intel x86_64 architecture for the NLP pipeline was up to 33.4% more expensive than ARM64 as a result of incentivized pricing from the cloud provider and slower pipeline runtime due to greater resource contention for Intel processors.","PeriodicalId":129216,"journal":{"name":"Companion of the 2022 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering","volume":"271 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing X86 and ARM Serverless Performance Variation: A Natural Language Processing Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Lambion, Robert Schmitz, R. Cordingly, Navid Heydari, W. Lloyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3491204.3543506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we leverage a Natural Language Processing (NLP) pipeline for topic modeling consisting of three functions for data preprocessing, model training, and inferencing to analyze serverless platform performance variation. Specifically, we investigated performance using x86_64 and ARM64 processors over a 24-hour day starting at midnight local time on four cloud regions across three continents on AWS Lambda. We identified public cloud resource contention by leveraging the CPU steal metric, and examined relationships to NLP pipeline runtime. Intel x86_64 Xeon processors at the same clock rate as ARM64 processors (Graviton 2) were more than 23% faster for model training, but ARM64 processors were faster for data preprocessing and inferencing. Use of the Intel x86_64 architecture for the NLP pipeline was up to 33.4% more expensive than ARM64 as a result of incentivized pricing from the cloud provider and slower pipeline runtime due to greater resource contention for Intel processors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Companion of the 2022 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering\",\"volume\":\"271 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Companion of the 2022 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3491204.3543506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Companion of the 2022 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3491204.3543506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在本文中,我们利用自然语言处理(NLP)管道进行主题建模,该管道由数据预处理、模型训练和推理三个功能组成,以分析无服务器平台的性能变化。具体来说,我们在AWS Lambda上横跨三大洲的四个云区域上使用x86_64和ARM64处理器,从当地时间午夜开始,在24小时内调查了性能。我们通过利用CPU窃取指标确定了公共云资源争用,并检查了与NLP管道运行时的关系。与ARM64处理器(Graviton 2)时钟速率相同的Intel x86_64 Xeon处理器在模型训练方面要快23%以上,但ARM64处理器在数据预处理和推理方面要快得多。使用Intel x86_64架构的NLP管道的成本比ARM64高33.4%,这是由于云提供商的激励定价以及由于Intel处理器更大的资源争用而导致的管道运行时间较慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterizing X86 and ARM Serverless Performance Variation: A Natural Language Processing Case Study
In this paper, we leverage a Natural Language Processing (NLP) pipeline for topic modeling consisting of three functions for data preprocessing, model training, and inferencing to analyze serverless platform performance variation. Specifically, we investigated performance using x86_64 and ARM64 processors over a 24-hour day starting at midnight local time on four cloud regions across three continents on AWS Lambda. We identified public cloud resource contention by leveraging the CPU steal metric, and examined relationships to NLP pipeline runtime. Intel x86_64 Xeon processors at the same clock rate as ARM64 processors (Graviton 2) were more than 23% faster for model training, but ARM64 processors were faster for data preprocessing and inferencing. Use of the Intel x86_64 architecture for the NLP pipeline was up to 33.4% more expensive than ARM64 as a result of incentivized pricing from the cloud provider and slower pipeline runtime due to greater resource contention for Intel processors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SPEC Efficiency Benchmark Development: How to Contribute to the Future of Energy Conservation Change Point Detection for MongoDB Time Series Performance Regression Performance Evaluation of GraphCore IPU-M2000 Accelerator for Text Detection Application Measuring Baseline Overheads in Different Orchestration Mechanisms for Large FaaS Workflows MAPLE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1