{"title":"不可社交性与康德历史哲学的情节","authors":"Eduardo Charpenel","doi":"10.4067/s0718-50652019000100207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I present a reconstruction of the Kantian notion of unsocial sociability with the aim of showing its relation with other key elements of Kant’s philosophy such as radical evil, moral autonomy, and the history of mankind considered from a heuristic teleological viewpoint. Given the multiple connections and associations this notion can give rise to, I consider of utmost importance to elucidate how Kant understood our social and unsocial dimensions, and how these can have an impact upon the ways we develop our judicial and political institutions and our moral practices. Through the present analysis I believe, on the one hand, that certain interpretative mistakes such as those of Allen W. Wood and Jane Kneller can be corrected, and, on the other hand, that we can be in better conditions to appreciate the ongoing validity of Kant’s historical and anthropological project.","PeriodicalId":111465,"journal":{"name":"Límite (Arica)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LA INSOCIABLE SOCIABILIDAD Y LA TRAMA DE LA FILOSOFÍA KANTIANA DE LA HISTORIA\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Charpenel\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-50652019000100207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article I present a reconstruction of the Kantian notion of unsocial sociability with the aim of showing its relation with other key elements of Kant’s philosophy such as radical evil, moral autonomy, and the history of mankind considered from a heuristic teleological viewpoint. Given the multiple connections and associations this notion can give rise to, I consider of utmost importance to elucidate how Kant understood our social and unsocial dimensions, and how these can have an impact upon the ways we develop our judicial and political institutions and our moral practices. Through the present analysis I believe, on the one hand, that certain interpretative mistakes such as those of Allen W. Wood and Jane Kneller can be corrected, and, on the other hand, that we can be in better conditions to appreciate the ongoing validity of Kant’s historical and anthropological project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Límite (Arica)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Límite (Arica)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50652019000100207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Límite (Arica)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50652019000100207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇文章中,我提出了康德的非社会社会性概念的重建,目的是展示它与康德哲学的其他关键要素的关系,如激进的邪恶,道德自治,以及从启发式目的论的角度考虑的人类历史。考虑到这一概念可能产生的多重联系和关联,我认为阐明康德如何理解我们的社会和非社会维度,以及这些维度如何影响我们发展司法和政治制度以及道德实践的方式是至关重要的。通过目前的分析,我相信,一方面,某些解释错误,如Allen W. Wood和Jane Kneller的错误可以得到纠正,另一方面,我们可以更好地欣赏康德的历史和人类学项目的持续有效性。
LA INSOCIABLE SOCIABILIDAD Y LA TRAMA DE LA FILOSOFÍA KANTIANA DE LA HISTORIA
In this article I present a reconstruction of the Kantian notion of unsocial sociability with the aim of showing its relation with other key elements of Kant’s philosophy such as radical evil, moral autonomy, and the history of mankind considered from a heuristic teleological viewpoint. Given the multiple connections and associations this notion can give rise to, I consider of utmost importance to elucidate how Kant understood our social and unsocial dimensions, and how these can have an impact upon the ways we develop our judicial and political institutions and our moral practices. Through the present analysis I believe, on the one hand, that certain interpretative mistakes such as those of Allen W. Wood and Jane Kneller can be corrected, and, on the other hand, that we can be in better conditions to appreciate the ongoing validity of Kant’s historical and anthropological project.