电动汽车认证方法的评估

Henry Gadacz
{"title":"电动汽车认证方法的评估","authors":"Henry Gadacz","doi":"10.1145/3488904.3493384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the public charging of Electric Vehicles (EVs), ISO 15118 specifies the Plug and Charge (PnC) approach. Unfortunately, PnC requires a quite complex Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and completely lacks privacy-preserving measures. This work shows that other approaches from the literature and a novel introduced approach outperform PnC. All thirteen approaches were rated based on a developed evaluation methodology, regarding their security, usability, offered features and interoperability. For the best approaches recommendations regarding a more detailed analysis and comparison are given. These promising approaches should be further analyzed and more detailed specified, in order to mitigate current security flaws and offer the user a great and easy charging experience.","PeriodicalId":332312,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of electric mobility authentication approaches\",\"authors\":\"Henry Gadacz\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3488904.3493384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the public charging of Electric Vehicles (EVs), ISO 15118 specifies the Plug and Charge (PnC) approach. Unfortunately, PnC requires a quite complex Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and completely lacks privacy-preserving measures. This work shows that other approaches from the literature and a novel introduced approach outperform PnC. All thirteen approaches were rated based on a developed evaluation methodology, regarding their security, usability, offered features and interoperability. For the best approaches recommendations regarding a more detailed analysis and comparison are given. These promising approaches should be further analyzed and more detailed specified, in order to mitigate current security flaws and offer the user a great and easy charging experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3488904.3493384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3488904.3493384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对于电动汽车(ev)的公共充电,ISO 15118规定了即插即用(PnC)方法。不幸的是,PnC需要相当复杂的公钥基础设施(PKI),并且完全缺乏隐私保护措施。这项工作表明,文献中的其他方法和一种新引入的方法优于PnC。所有13种方法都是根据开发的评估方法对其安全性、可用性、提供的功能和互操作性进行评级的。对于最佳方法,给出了有关更详细的分析和比较的建议。这些有前途的方法应该进一步分析和更详细地指定,以减轻当前的安全漏洞,并为用户提供一个伟大而简单的充电体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of electric mobility authentication approaches
For the public charging of Electric Vehicles (EVs), ISO 15118 specifies the Plug and Charge (PnC) approach. Unfortunately, PnC requires a quite complex Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and completely lacks privacy-preserving measures. This work shows that other approaches from the literature and a novel introduced approach outperform PnC. All thirteen approaches were rated based on a developed evaluation methodology, regarding their security, usability, offered features and interoperability. For the best approaches recommendations regarding a more detailed analysis and comparison are given. These promising approaches should be further analyzed and more detailed specified, in order to mitigate current security flaws and offer the user a great and easy charging experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of De-Identification Techniques for Privacy Preserving Data Analysis in Vehicular Data Sharing Improved Sensor Model for Realistic Synthetic Data Generation Proposing HEAVENS 2.0 – an automotive risk assessment model Following the White Rabbit: Integrity Verification Based on Risk Analysis Results Real-time Uncertainty Estimation Based On Intermediate Layer Variational Inference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1