从康德哲学的规范疯癫观来理解2020年和2021年的反疫苗和反口罩抗议

Johan Sebastián Mayorga Alberto
{"title":"从康德哲学的规范疯癫观来理解2020年和2021年的反疫苗和反口罩抗议","authors":"Johan Sebastián Mayorga Alberto","doi":"10.46652/resistances.v3i6.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text aims to offer a epistemic-normative reading of madness in Kant's work and its different developments throughout his work. This to maintain that madness arises from rationality itself when understood it as a force that exceeds the limits that reason imposes on itself. By outlining normality or mental sanity as the restriction of reason to sensibility, Kant intends -I maintain- to outline the minimum subjective and epistemic conditions for a republican political conformation, which is based on the agreement between subjects about the rules that will regulate their actions and interactions. This reading will allow us to outline an understanding of the anti-vaccine protest that took place during the pandemic. Showing that those who promote and follow them break with this minimum agreement on the restrictions of reason, thus reaching selfish excesses that harm democratic dynamics. I concluded that these people can be understood as madness people who represent a danger to the republican and democratic political organization.","PeriodicalId":303053,"journal":{"name":"Resistances. Journal of the Philosophy of History","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A normative view of madness from Kantian philosophy to understand anti-vaccine and anti-mask protests of 2020 and 2021\",\"authors\":\"Johan Sebastián Mayorga Alberto\",\"doi\":\"10.46652/resistances.v3i6.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This text aims to offer a epistemic-normative reading of madness in Kant's work and its different developments throughout his work. This to maintain that madness arises from rationality itself when understood it as a force that exceeds the limits that reason imposes on itself. By outlining normality or mental sanity as the restriction of reason to sensibility, Kant intends -I maintain- to outline the minimum subjective and epistemic conditions for a republican political conformation, which is based on the agreement between subjects about the rules that will regulate their actions and interactions. This reading will allow us to outline an understanding of the anti-vaccine protest that took place during the pandemic. Showing that those who promote and follow them break with this minimum agreement on the restrictions of reason, thus reaching selfish excesses that harm democratic dynamics. I concluded that these people can be understood as madness people who represent a danger to the republican and democratic political organization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":303053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resistances. Journal of the Philosophy of History\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resistances. Journal of the Philosophy of History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v3i6.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resistances. Journal of the Philosophy of History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v3i6.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是提供一个认识论规范阅读疯癫在康德的工作和其不同的发展贯穿他的工作。当我们把理性理解为一种超越理性自身限制的力量时,就会认为疯狂源于理性本身。通过将常态或精神健全概括为理性对感性的限制,康德打算——我坚持认为——概述共和政治一致性的最低主观和认识论条件,这是基于主体之间关于规范其行为和互动的规则的协议。这篇阅读将使我们对大流行期间发生的反疫苗抗议活动有一个大致的了解。表明那些推动和追随他们的人打破了对理性限制的最低限度的共识,从而达到了自私的过度,损害了民主的动力。我的结论是,这些人可以被理解为疯子,他们对共和和民主政治组织构成了威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A normative view of madness from Kantian philosophy to understand anti-vaccine and anti-mask protests of 2020 and 2021
This text aims to offer a epistemic-normative reading of madness in Kant's work and its different developments throughout his work. This to maintain that madness arises from rationality itself when understood it as a force that exceeds the limits that reason imposes on itself. By outlining normality or mental sanity as the restriction of reason to sensibility, Kant intends -I maintain- to outline the minimum subjective and epistemic conditions for a republican political conformation, which is based on the agreement between subjects about the rules that will regulate their actions and interactions. This reading will allow us to outline an understanding of the anti-vaccine protest that took place during the pandemic. Showing that those who promote and follow them break with this minimum agreement on the restrictions of reason, thus reaching selfish excesses that harm democratic dynamics. I concluded that these people can be understood as madness people who represent a danger to the republican and democratic political organization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness Enhancing Concentration in English Foreign Language Reading Comprehension A Movie Method Proposal to teach vocabulary for “Nuevo Rocafuerte High School” EFL Students Teaching strategies for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in English as foreign language classrooms Aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en el Derecho Penal: problemas y desafios Falta de disposiciones jurídicas que regulen el aspecto probatorio en materia de tránsito
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1