围绕COVID-19救济计划的欺诈行为的定性审查

Mackenzie M. Festa, Megan M. Jones, Kevin G. Knotts
{"title":"围绕COVID-19救济计划的欺诈行为的定性审查","authors":"Mackenzie M. Festa, Megan M. Jones, Kevin G. Knotts","doi":"10.2308/jfar-2022-029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, we profile coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) relief program frauds and agencies tasked with investigating those related crimes. Using a unique dataset of Department of Justice (DOJ) press releases from March 2020 to February 2022 relating to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Securities (CARES) Act, we qualitatively examine characteristics (e.g., wrongdoing, perpetrators, organizations affected, and collusions versus single actors) of approximately $2.6 billion of alleged fraud across the various relief programs. The most egregious fraud cases involved the abuse of the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and/or multiple CARES Act relief programs. Although there is some collusive fraud, most cases list only a single defendant. Lastly, we provide evidence suggesting a high degree of collaboration across agencies in the investigative process. These results also can help practitioners and academics better understand fraudulent activities of federal programs.\n Data Availability: The data are available from the authors.","PeriodicalId":149240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Review of Fraud Surrounding COVID-19 Relief Programs\",\"authors\":\"Mackenzie M. Festa, Megan M. Jones, Kevin G. Knotts\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/jfar-2022-029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this paper, we profile coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) relief program frauds and agencies tasked with investigating those related crimes. Using a unique dataset of Department of Justice (DOJ) press releases from March 2020 to February 2022 relating to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Securities (CARES) Act, we qualitatively examine characteristics (e.g., wrongdoing, perpetrators, organizations affected, and collusions versus single actors) of approximately $2.6 billion of alleged fraud across the various relief programs. The most egregious fraud cases involved the abuse of the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and/or multiple CARES Act relief programs. Although there is some collusive fraud, most cases list only a single defendant. Lastly, we provide evidence suggesting a high degree of collaboration across agencies in the investigative process. These results also can help practitioners and academics better understand fraudulent activities of federal programs.\\n Data Availability: The data are available from the authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2022-029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2022-029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们介绍了2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)救济计划欺诈和负责调查这些相关犯罪的机构。我们使用司法部(DOJ)从2020年3月至2022年2月与冠状病毒援助、救济和经济证券(CARES)法案有关的新闻稿的独特数据集,定性地研究了各种救济计划中约26亿美元涉嫌欺诈的特征(例如,不法行为、犯罪者、受影响的组织以及与单一行为者的勾结)。最令人震惊的欺诈案件涉及滥用工资保护计划(PPP)和/或多个关怀法案救济计划。虽然有一些串谋欺诈,但大多数案件只有一个被告。最后,我们提供的证据表明,在调查过程中,各机构之间的合作程度很高。这些结果还可以帮助从业者和学者更好地了解联邦项目的欺诈活动。数据可用性:数据可从作者处获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Qualitative Review of Fraud Surrounding COVID-19 Relief Programs
In this paper, we profile coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) relief program frauds and agencies tasked with investigating those related crimes. Using a unique dataset of Department of Justice (DOJ) press releases from March 2020 to February 2022 relating to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Securities (CARES) Act, we qualitatively examine characteristics (e.g., wrongdoing, perpetrators, organizations affected, and collusions versus single actors) of approximately $2.6 billion of alleged fraud across the various relief programs. The most egregious fraud cases involved the abuse of the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and/or multiple CARES Act relief programs. Although there is some collusive fraud, most cases list only a single defendant. Lastly, we provide evidence suggesting a high degree of collaboration across agencies in the investigative process. These results also can help practitioners and academics better understand fraudulent activities of federal programs. Data Availability: The data are available from the authors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of the Dark Triad on Organizational Fraud Manufacturing and Fraud: Evidence from Price Competition and Lean Inventories Remembering the Events of the COVID-19 Pandemic Editorial Policy Taxation and Forensic Accounting: Informing Research and Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1