以牙还牙策略的公平计算

Yilei Wang, Qiuliang Xu, Zhe Liu
{"title":"以牙还牙策略的公平计算","authors":"Yilei Wang, Qiuliang Xu, Zhe Liu","doi":"10.1109/INCoS.2013.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complete fairness means that either all parties learn the output of the function or none of them does. It was deemed as an impossible task in general in secure two party computation by Cleve (STOC 1986). However, a seminal result of complete fairness between two parties was achieved by Gordorn et al. (STOC 2008). Recently Groce and Katz (Euro crypt 2012) corrected the insufficient assumptions and gave some positive results of fairness. Here we revisit this problem and introduce the Tit-for-Tat (TFT) strategy into rational two-party computation. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first secure two-party computation protocol with constant rounds that allows both parties to know the terminal round.","PeriodicalId":353706,"journal":{"name":"2013 5th International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems","volume":"50 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fair Computation with Tit-for-Tat Strategy\",\"authors\":\"Yilei Wang, Qiuliang Xu, Zhe Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INCoS.2013.55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Complete fairness means that either all parties learn the output of the function or none of them does. It was deemed as an impossible task in general in secure two party computation by Cleve (STOC 1986). However, a seminal result of complete fairness between two parties was achieved by Gordorn et al. (STOC 2008). Recently Groce and Katz (Euro crypt 2012) corrected the insufficient assumptions and gave some positive results of fairness. Here we revisit this problem and introduce the Tit-for-Tat (TFT) strategy into rational two-party computation. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first secure two-party computation protocol with constant rounds that allows both parties to know the terminal round.\",\"PeriodicalId\":353706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 5th International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems\",\"volume\":\"50 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 5th International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2013.55\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 5th International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2013.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

完全公平意味着,要么所有参与方都知道函数的输出,要么没有参与方知道。Cleve (STOC 1986)认为这是安全双方计算中一般不可能完成的任务。然而,Gordorn等人(STOC 2008)取得了双方完全公平的开创性成果。最近Groce和Katz (Euro crypt 2012)纠正了不充分的假设,并给出了一些积极的公平结果。在这里,我们重新审视这个问题,并将针锋相对(TFT)策略引入到理性的双方计算中。据我们所知,它是第一个安全的两方计算协议,具有恒定的轮数,允许双方都知道终端轮数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fair Computation with Tit-for-Tat Strategy
Complete fairness means that either all parties learn the output of the function or none of them does. It was deemed as an impossible task in general in secure two party computation by Cleve (STOC 1986). However, a seminal result of complete fairness between two parties was achieved by Gordorn et al. (STOC 2008). Recently Groce and Katz (Euro crypt 2012) corrected the insufficient assumptions and gave some positive results of fairness. Here we revisit this problem and introduce the Tit-for-Tat (TFT) strategy into rational two-party computation. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first secure two-party computation protocol with constant rounds that allows both parties to know the terminal round.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improved Efficient Priority-and-Activity-Based QoS MAC Protocol Impact of Channel Estimation Error on Time Division Broadcast Protocol in Bidirectional Relaying Systems RLWE-Based Homomorphic Encryption and Private Information Retrieval A Spatially Varying Mean and Variance Active Contour Model A Secure Cloud Storage System from Threshold Encryption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1