重新思考区域发展

L. Dellmuth
{"title":"重新思考区域发展","authors":"L. Dellmuth","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529217469.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter articulates the research problem that economic growth in the EU since the 2008 global financial crisis has made the EU ostensibly successful, yet we continue to see pervasive well-being problems in the EU. Despite a large literature on EU spending effects on growth, we know little about how the EU can use its budgetary resources to enhance well-being. Well-being and related concepts such as inequality, inclusive growth, and social investments, have been extensively studied in the welfare state and social policy literature, but not in relation to EU spending. This chapter describes how the book fills this knowledge gap. It presents the book’s main argument and contribution, introduces the empirical context of EU spending in which the inquiry is undertaken, and summarizes the main evidence in the context of a chapter synopsis.","PeriodicalId":388586,"journal":{"name":"Is Europe Good for You?","volume":"260 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking Regional Development\",\"authors\":\"L. Dellmuth\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/policypress/9781529217469.003.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter articulates the research problem that economic growth in the EU since the 2008 global financial crisis has made the EU ostensibly successful, yet we continue to see pervasive well-being problems in the EU. Despite a large literature on EU spending effects on growth, we know little about how the EU can use its budgetary resources to enhance well-being. Well-being and related concepts such as inequality, inclusive growth, and social investments, have been extensively studied in the welfare state and social policy literature, but not in relation to EU spending. This chapter describes how the book fills this knowledge gap. It presents the book’s main argument and contribution, introduces the empirical context of EU spending in which the inquiry is undertaken, and summarizes the main evidence in the context of a chapter synopsis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Is Europe Good for You?\",\"volume\":\"260 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Is Europe Good for You?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529217469.003.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Is Europe Good for You?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529217469.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章阐述了一个研究问题,即自2008年全球金融危机以来,欧盟的经济增长使欧盟表面上取得了成功,但我们仍然看到欧盟普遍存在的福祉问题。尽管有大量关于欧盟支出对增长影响的文献,但我们对欧盟如何利用其预算资源来提高福祉知之甚少。福利和相关概念,如不平等、包容性增长和社会投资,在福利国家和社会政策文献中得到了广泛研究,但与欧盟支出无关。本章描述本书如何填补这一知识空白。它提出了本书的主要论点和贡献,介绍了欧盟支出的实证背景,其中调查是进行的,并总结了章节简介的背景下的主要证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rethinking Regional Development
This chapter articulates the research problem that economic growth in the EU since the 2008 global financial crisis has made the EU ostensibly successful, yet we continue to see pervasive well-being problems in the EU. Despite a large literature on EU spending effects on growth, we know little about how the EU can use its budgetary resources to enhance well-being. Well-being and related concepts such as inequality, inclusive growth, and social investments, have been extensively studied in the welfare state and social policy literature, but not in relation to EU spending. This chapter describes how the book fills this knowledge gap. It presents the book’s main argument and contribution, introduces the empirical context of EU spending in which the inquiry is undertaken, and summarizes the main evidence in the context of a chapter synopsis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EU Spending Effects on Regional Well-Being Barriers to Improving Regional Well-Being Regional Well-Being, Inclusive Growth and EU Legitimacy Back Matter Rethinking Regional Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1