试图在澳大利亚联邦议会的质询时间中衡量问题的质量

A. Turpin
{"title":"试图在澳大利亚联邦议会的质询时间中衡量问题的质量","authors":"A. Turpin","doi":"10.1145/2407085.2407098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses standard information retrieval techniques to measure the quality of information exchange during Question Time in the Australian Federal Parliament's House of Representatives from 1998 to 2012. A search engine is used to index all answers to questions, and then runs each question as a query, recording the rank of the actual answer in the returned list of documents. Using this rank as a measure of quality, Question Time has deteriorated over the last decade. The main deterioration has been in information exchange in \"Dorothy Dixer\" questions. The corpus used for this study is available from the author's web page for further investigations.","PeriodicalId":402985,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Document Computing Symposium","volume":"311 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An attempt to measure the quality of questions in question time of the Australian Federal Parliament\",\"authors\":\"A. Turpin\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2407085.2407098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper uses standard information retrieval techniques to measure the quality of information exchange during Question Time in the Australian Federal Parliament's House of Representatives from 1998 to 2012. A search engine is used to index all answers to questions, and then runs each question as a query, recording the rank of the actual answer in the returned list of documents. Using this rank as a measure of quality, Question Time has deteriorated over the last decade. The main deterioration has been in information exchange in \\\"Dorothy Dixer\\\" questions. The corpus used for this study is available from the author's web page for further investigations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Document Computing Symposium\",\"volume\":\"311 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Document Computing Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2407085.2407098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Document Computing Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2407085.2407098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文采用标准信息检索技术对1998年至2012年澳大利亚联邦议会众议院质询时间的信息交换质量进行了测量。搜索引擎用于索引所有问题的答案,然后将每个问题作为查询运行,记录实际答案在返回的文档列表中的排名。用这个排名作为质量的衡量标准,提问时间在过去的十年里已经恶化了。“多萝西·迪克斯”问题中的信息交换是主要的退化。本研究使用的语料库可从作者的网页上获得,以供进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An attempt to measure the quality of questions in question time of the Australian Federal Parliament
This paper uses standard information retrieval techniques to measure the quality of information exchange during Question Time in the Australian Federal Parliament's House of Representatives from 1998 to 2012. A search engine is used to index all answers to questions, and then runs each question as a query, recording the rank of the actual answer in the returned list of documents. Using this rank as a measure of quality, Question Time has deteriorated over the last decade. The main deterioration has been in information exchange in "Dorothy Dixer" questions. The corpus used for this study is available from the author's web page for further investigations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the magic of WAND Classifying microblogs for disasters Using eye tracking for evaluating web search interfaces Power walk: revisiting the random surfer Efficient top-k retrieval with signatures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1