合作实践对法律职业的激进可能性:“形势下的[两个律师和两个委托人]”

Robert F. Cochran
{"title":"合作实践对法律职业的激进可能性:“形势下的[两个律师和两个委托人]”","authors":"Robert F. Cochran","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1605322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative Practice (CP) significantly changes the way that legal disputes are resolved from beginning to end. CP is a dramatic shift from the way law is generally practiced today in the United States and it has the potential to transform that practice. Cochran considers the two dramatic changes that CP brings to law practice: a change in the mental attitude of lawyers and clients toward the conflict and a change in lawyers’ counseling techniques. Part Two of the article defines CP and compares it to traditional negotiation-pending-litigation (NPL). Part Three considers the change in attorney and client mental attitudes wrought by CP, where both lawyers and clients take responsibility for identifying a resolution that will meet the needs of all of the parties. Part Four considers the type of client-counseling that is often generated by CP - lawyers in CP may strongly encourage clients to find a resolution that meets the needs of all of the parties. Cochran concludes with a consideration of the possible future of CP.","PeriodicalId":350514,"journal":{"name":"Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative Practice’s Radical Possibilities for the Legal Profession: '[Two Lawyers and Two Clients] for the Situation'\",\"authors\":\"Robert F. Cochran\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1605322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Collaborative Practice (CP) significantly changes the way that legal disputes are resolved from beginning to end. CP is a dramatic shift from the way law is generally practiced today in the United States and it has the potential to transform that practice. Cochran considers the two dramatic changes that CP brings to law practice: a change in the mental attitude of lawyers and clients toward the conflict and a change in lawyers’ counseling techniques. Part Two of the article defines CP and compares it to traditional negotiation-pending-litigation (NPL). Part Three considers the change in attorney and client mental attitudes wrought by CP, where both lawyers and clients take responsibility for identifying a resolution that will meet the needs of all of the parties. Part Four considers the type of client-counseling that is often generated by CP - lawyers in CP may strongly encourage clients to find a resolution that meets the needs of all of the parties. Cochran concludes with a consideration of the possible future of CP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1605322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1605322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

协同实践(CP)从始至终显著地改变了法律纠纷的解决方式。CP是当今美国法律实践方式的一个巨大转变,它有可能改变这种做法。Cochran认为CP给法律实践带来了两个戏剧性的变化:律师和客户对冲突的心理态度的变化和律师咨询技术的变化。文章的第二部分对债权团进行了界定,并将其与传统的议付未决诉讼进行了比较。第三部分考虑了合作伙伴关系所带来的律师和客户心理态度的变化,律师和客户都有责任确定一个满足各方需求的解决方案。第四部分考虑了客户咨询的类型,这通常是由合作伙伴关系产生的——合作伙伴关系的律师可能会强烈鼓励客户找到一个满足各方需求的解决方案。Cochran最后考虑了CP的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collaborative Practice’s Radical Possibilities for the Legal Profession: '[Two Lawyers and Two Clients] for the Situation'
Collaborative Practice (CP) significantly changes the way that legal disputes are resolved from beginning to end. CP is a dramatic shift from the way law is generally practiced today in the United States and it has the potential to transform that practice. Cochran considers the two dramatic changes that CP brings to law practice: a change in the mental attitude of lawyers and clients toward the conflict and a change in lawyers’ counseling techniques. Part Two of the article defines CP and compares it to traditional negotiation-pending-litigation (NPL). Part Three considers the change in attorney and client mental attitudes wrought by CP, where both lawyers and clients take responsibility for identifying a resolution that will meet the needs of all of the parties. Part Four considers the type of client-counseling that is often generated by CP - lawyers in CP may strongly encourage clients to find a resolution that meets the needs of all of the parties. Cochran concludes with a consideration of the possible future of CP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'Final' Awards Reconceptualized: A Proposal to Resolve the Hall Street Circuit Split Collaborative Practice’s Radical Possibilities for the Legal Profession: '[Two Lawyers and Two Clients] for the Situation' Cutting the Cord: Ho'oponopono and Hawaiian Restorative Justice in the Criminal Law Context Images of Justice Contracting Around RUAA: Default Rules, Mandatory Rules, and Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1