法院行政违法反垄断控制诉讼挑战的现状与问题

Кirill А. Pisenko
{"title":"法院行政违法反垄断控制诉讼挑战的现状与问题","authors":"Кirill А. Pisenko","doi":"10.37399/2686-9241.2021.2.103-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article is devoted to the development of methods of solving the current issues and problems of how to challenge legal acts of administrative offence proceedings for antimonopoly control in the courts. The focus is on the problem of the balance of interests between support for, and on the other hand increasing the burden on the judicial system of administrative procedural regulations for challenging such acts. Theoretical Basis. Methods. The theoretical basis of this article is the works of domestic and foreign researchers in the field of jurisprudence. This is primarily the administration and administrative procedures, antimonopoly (competition) law, business law and their related scientific fields. The methodological basis of this research is a combination of philosophical, general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition. Results. This study of administrative and procedural antimonopoly regulation has shown that there is no well-thought-out system of legal means in the legislation that meets the needs of en- suring a balance of interests in terms of approaches to procedural economy and the efficiency of using public and private resources. As a result, administrative and judicial proceedings in- crease for the same events of alleged violations whilst there is an absence of an objective need to engage in many of them. This leads to overloading of the judicial system, an unreasonable expenditure of public resources and costs of participants in the process. It creates unreason- able economic-legal barriers, resulting in the distraction of the forces and resources of the state and the private sector from solving problems of social-economic development and socially useful business activity. Discussion and Conclusion. To overcome this complicated problem, obviously, requires legisla- tive change, confidently using the principles of law, and an analogy of law that will form the ap- proaches for the objective needs of the balance of interests. This paper contains specific propos- als for the development of such approaches.","PeriodicalId":184770,"journal":{"name":"Pravosudie / Justice","volume":"179 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Issues and Problems of Challenging Legal Proceedings for Antimonopoly Control of Administrative Offences Legal in Courts\",\"authors\":\"Кirill А. Pisenko\",\"doi\":\"10.37399/2686-9241.2021.2.103-116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The article is devoted to the development of methods of solving the current issues and problems of how to challenge legal acts of administrative offence proceedings for antimonopoly control in the courts. The focus is on the problem of the balance of interests between support for, and on the other hand increasing the burden on the judicial system of administrative procedural regulations for challenging such acts. Theoretical Basis. Methods. The theoretical basis of this article is the works of domestic and foreign researchers in the field of jurisprudence. This is primarily the administration and administrative procedures, antimonopoly (competition) law, business law and their related scientific fields. The methodological basis of this research is a combination of philosophical, general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition. Results. This study of administrative and procedural antimonopoly regulation has shown that there is no well-thought-out system of legal means in the legislation that meets the needs of en- suring a balance of interests in terms of approaches to procedural economy and the efficiency of using public and private resources. As a result, administrative and judicial proceedings in- crease for the same events of alleged violations whilst there is an absence of an objective need to engage in many of them. This leads to overloading of the judicial system, an unreasonable expenditure of public resources and costs of participants in the process. It creates unreason- able economic-legal barriers, resulting in the distraction of the forces and resources of the state and the private sector from solving problems of social-economic development and socially useful business activity. Discussion and Conclusion. To overcome this complicated problem, obviously, requires legisla- tive change, confidently using the principles of law, and an analogy of law that will form the ap- proaches for the objective needs of the balance of interests. This paper contains specific propos- als for the development of such approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pravosudie / Justice\",\"volume\":\"179 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pravosudie / Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37399/2686-9241.2021.2.103-116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravosudie / Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37399/2686-9241.2021.2.103-116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。本文探讨了如何在法院对反垄断控制的行政违法诉讼中的法律行为进行抗辩,以解决目前存在的问题和问题。其重点是支持之间的利益平衡问题,另一方面又增加了司法系统对行政程序性法规质疑这类行为的负担。理论基础。方法。本文的理论基础是国内外法理学研究者的著作。这主要是行政管理与行政程序、反垄断(竞争)法、商法及其相关的科学领域。本研究的方法论基础是哲学的、一般科学的和私人科学的认知方法的结合。结果。通过对行政反垄断规制和程序性反垄断规制的研究发现,我国立法中并没有一套经过深思熟虑的法律手段体系,能够在程序经济途径和公私资源利用效率方面满足利益平衡的需要。其结果是,针对同一事件的行政和司法诉讼增加了,而其中许多事件却没有客观需要进行。这导致了司法系统的超载,公共资源的不合理支出和过程参与者的成本。它造成了不合理的经济法律障碍,导致国家和私营部门的力量和资源被分散,无法解决社会经济发展问题和对社会有益的商业活动。讨论与结论。要克服这一复杂的问题,显然需要立法改革,自信地运用法律原则和法律类比,这将形成利益平衡客观需要的途径。本文对发展这类方法提出了具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current Issues and Problems of Challenging Legal Proceedings for Antimonopoly Control of Administrative Offences Legal in Courts
Introduction. The article is devoted to the development of methods of solving the current issues and problems of how to challenge legal acts of administrative offence proceedings for antimonopoly control in the courts. The focus is on the problem of the balance of interests between support for, and on the other hand increasing the burden on the judicial system of administrative procedural regulations for challenging such acts. Theoretical Basis. Methods. The theoretical basis of this article is the works of domestic and foreign researchers in the field of jurisprudence. This is primarily the administration and administrative procedures, antimonopoly (competition) law, business law and their related scientific fields. The methodological basis of this research is a combination of philosophical, general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition. Results. This study of administrative and procedural antimonopoly regulation has shown that there is no well-thought-out system of legal means in the legislation that meets the needs of en- suring a balance of interests in terms of approaches to procedural economy and the efficiency of using public and private resources. As a result, administrative and judicial proceedings in- crease for the same events of alleged violations whilst there is an absence of an objective need to engage in many of them. This leads to overloading of the judicial system, an unreasonable expenditure of public resources and costs of participants in the process. It creates unreason- able economic-legal barriers, resulting in the distraction of the forces and resources of the state and the private sector from solving problems of social-economic development and socially useful business activity. Discussion and Conclusion. To overcome this complicated problem, obviously, requires legisla- tive change, confidently using the principles of law, and an analogy of law that will form the ap- proaches for the objective needs of the balance of interests. This paper contains specific propos- als for the development of such approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Philosophical and Legal Foundations of the Scientific Worldview of A. L. Blok Determinants of Legal Behaviour Criminal Procedure Code of Russia: Twenty Years Later (2001–2021) Transformation of Criminal Proceedings against Minors in Contemporary Russian Criminal Procedure: Towards the Twentieth Anniversary of the Adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation The Unity of the Material and Procedural Elements of a Legal Entity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1