{"title":"半导体工业的工程链要求","authors":"J. Chang, F. Cheng","doi":"10.1109/COASE.2005.1506799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The successful rate of microelectronic device's first design declines year by year. The first design failure results in increasing the design cost because of adding the possible expenses of the subsequent design revisions. Also, the shorter life cycle due to late start of mass-production may incur lower revenue of device selling. Therefore, the requirement for an efficient and effective microelectronic device's design cycle is needed. Different from IDM (integrated design and manufacturing), current semiconductor industry has a new business model. Device designer, which does not have any of the following resources: IP/library, mask operation, foundry FAB, IC assembly house and IC test house, but they still can design and manufacture a device by communicating with the global-community resources. Actually, more than 30% of semiconductor revenue is from fabless design houses, foundry service providers and professional assembly/test houses. The microelectronic device's design cycle needs tremendous amount of engineering data exchange in this collaboration. The microelectronic device design cycle with engineering collaboration is defined as \"engineering chain\". A well-defined requirement of this engineering-chain operation for improving the successful rate of microelectronic device's design, reducing design cost and increasing revenue is therefore essential. Also, this requirement becomes the foundations for an engineering chain management system to provide a common platform to integrate heterogeneous processes as a unified operation.","PeriodicalId":181408,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, 2005.","volume":"171 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engineering-chain requirements for semiconductor industry\",\"authors\":\"J. Chang, F. Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COASE.2005.1506799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The successful rate of microelectronic device's first design declines year by year. The first design failure results in increasing the design cost because of adding the possible expenses of the subsequent design revisions. Also, the shorter life cycle due to late start of mass-production may incur lower revenue of device selling. Therefore, the requirement for an efficient and effective microelectronic device's design cycle is needed. Different from IDM (integrated design and manufacturing), current semiconductor industry has a new business model. Device designer, which does not have any of the following resources: IP/library, mask operation, foundry FAB, IC assembly house and IC test house, but they still can design and manufacture a device by communicating with the global-community resources. Actually, more than 30% of semiconductor revenue is from fabless design houses, foundry service providers and professional assembly/test houses. The microelectronic device's design cycle needs tremendous amount of engineering data exchange in this collaboration. The microelectronic device design cycle with engineering collaboration is defined as \\\"engineering chain\\\". A well-defined requirement of this engineering-chain operation for improving the successful rate of microelectronic device's design, reducing design cost and increasing revenue is therefore essential. Also, this requirement becomes the foundations for an engineering chain management system to provide a common platform to integrate heterogeneous processes as a unified operation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":181408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"171 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2005.1506799\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2005.1506799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
微电子器件首次设计的成功率逐年下降。第一次设计失败导致设计成本增加,因为增加了后续设计修改的可能费用。此外,由于批量生产开始较晚,生命周期较短,可能导致设备销售收入下降。因此,需要一个高效、有效的微电子器件设计周期。与IDM (integrated design and manufacturing,集成设计与制造)不同,当前的半导体行业拥有一种全新的商业模式。器件设计者,他们没有IP/库、掩码操作、代工FAB、IC组装厂和IC测试厂等资源,但他们仍然可以通过与全球社区的资源交流来设计和制造器件。事实上,超过30%的半导体收入来自无晶圆厂设计公司、代工服务提供商和专业组装/测试公司。在这种合作中,微电子设备的设计周期需要大量的工程数据交换。将具有工程协同的微电子器件设计周期定义为“工程链”。为提高微电子器件的设计成功率,降低设计成本,增加收益,必须明确这种工程链操作的要求。同时,这一需求成为工程链管理系统的基础,该系统提供了一个公共平台,将异构过程集成为一个统一的操作。
Engineering-chain requirements for semiconductor industry
The successful rate of microelectronic device's first design declines year by year. The first design failure results in increasing the design cost because of adding the possible expenses of the subsequent design revisions. Also, the shorter life cycle due to late start of mass-production may incur lower revenue of device selling. Therefore, the requirement for an efficient and effective microelectronic device's design cycle is needed. Different from IDM (integrated design and manufacturing), current semiconductor industry has a new business model. Device designer, which does not have any of the following resources: IP/library, mask operation, foundry FAB, IC assembly house and IC test house, but they still can design and manufacture a device by communicating with the global-community resources. Actually, more than 30% of semiconductor revenue is from fabless design houses, foundry service providers and professional assembly/test houses. The microelectronic device's design cycle needs tremendous amount of engineering data exchange in this collaboration. The microelectronic device design cycle with engineering collaboration is defined as "engineering chain". A well-defined requirement of this engineering-chain operation for improving the successful rate of microelectronic device's design, reducing design cost and increasing revenue is therefore essential. Also, this requirement becomes the foundations for an engineering chain management system to provide a common platform to integrate heterogeneous processes as a unified operation.